A Pilot Project to Integrate Individualized Measurement Into Measurement-Based Care in a Child Partial Hospitalization Program.

day hospital individualized assessment measurement-based care partial hospitalization youth top problems

Journal

Behavior therapy
ISSN: 1878-1888
Titre abrégé: Behav Ther
Pays: England
ID NLM: 1251640

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 23 11 2022
revised: 05 06 2023
accepted: 05 06 2023
medline: 13 1 2024
pubmed: 13 1 2024
entrez: 12 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Measurement-based care (MBC), or the regular use of progress measures to inform clinical decision-making, improves quality of care and clinical outcomes. MBC typically focuses on standardized rather than individualized outcome measurement. In this pilot study, we examined the clinical utility of integrating individualized measurement with existing standardized outcome monitoring in a children's partial hospitalization program. Participants were 48 youth (M age 10.13 ± 1.39; 54.2% male, 41.7% female, 4.2% transgender or nonbinary). Comorbidity was common; 83.4% of youth had more than one diagnosis at intake. Using the Youth Top Problems for individualized outcome measurement, we examined Top Problem content and clinical improvement over time. Finally, we examined completion rates and describe implementation issues. Top Problems were heterogeneous and sensitive to change. Of the 144 problems, 107 (74%) had a focus consistent with measures used in program, while 37 (26%) were not captured by standardized measures used in program. Effect sizes from admission to final measurement ranged from Cohen's d = .75 - 1.00. Initial adoption of the MBC was strong, but sustained use of the system over the treatment course was challenging. Individualized outcome measurement in children's partial hospitalization programs is feasible to administer and sensitive to clinical change that is unique from change captured in standardized measures. Parents were able to self-identify clinically meaningful, highly individualized Top Problems. Challenges of implementation and clinical assessment in acute settings and potential strategies for improving implementation are discussed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38216232
pii: S0005-7894(23)00067-9
doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2023.06.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

191-200

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Association for Behavioral and Cognitive Therapies. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Ruben G Martinez (RG)

Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute; UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior.

Galen D McNeil (GD)

UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior.

Danielle Cornacchio (D)

UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior.

Benjamin N Schneider (BN)

UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior.

Tara S Peris (TS)

UCLA Jane & Terry Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior. Electronic address: tperis@mednet.ucla.edu.

Classifications MeSH