Prophylactic Radiotherapy Of MInimally Symptomatic Spinal Disease (PROMISSeD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Bone metastasis
External beam radiotherapy
Prophylactic radiation
Skeletal-related event
Spine lesion
Vertebral fracture
Vertebral metastasis
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
12 Jan 2024
12 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
18
06
2023
accepted:
03
12
2023
medline:
13
1
2024
pubmed:
13
1
2024
entrez:
12
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year. This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05. The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy. ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022. Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Early palliative/pre-emptive intervention improves clinical outcomes and quality of life for patients with metastatic cancer. A previous signal-seeking randomized controlled trial (RCT) demonstrated that early upfront radiotherapy to asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic high-risk osseous metastases led to reduction in skeletal-related events (SREs), a benefit driven primarily by subgroup of high-risk spine metastasis. The current RCT aims to determine whether early palliative/pre-emptive radiotherapy in patients with high-risk, asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic spine metastases will lead to fewer SREs within 1 year.
METHODS
METHODS
This is a single-center, parallel-arm, in-progress RCT in adults (≥ 18 years) with ECOG performance status 0-2 and asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic (not requiring opioids) high-risk spine metastases from histologically confirmed solid tumor malignancies with > 5 sites of metastatic disease on cross-sectional imaging. High-risk spine metastases are defined by the following: (a) bulkiest disease sites ≥ 2 cm; (b) junctional disease (occiput to C2, C7-T1, T12-L2, L5-S1); (c) posterior element involvement; or (d) vertebral body compression deformity > 50%. Patients are randomized 1:1 to receive either standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 1) or upfront, early radiotherapy to ≤ 5 high-risk spine lesions plus standard-of-care systemic therapy (arm 2), in the form of 20-30 Gy of radiation in 2-10 fractions. The primary endpoint is SRE, a composite outcome including spinal fracture, spinal cord compression, need for palliative radiotherapy, interventional procedures, or spinal surgery. Secondary endpoints include (1) surrogates of health care cost, including the number and duration of SRE-related hospitalizations; (2) overall survival; (3) pain-free survival; and (4) quality of life. Study instruments will be captured pre-treatment, at baseline, during treatment, and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-treatment. The trial aims to accrue 74 patients over 2 years to achieve > 80% power in detecting difference using two-sample proportion test with alpha < 0.05.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
The results of this RCT will demonstrate the value, if any, of early radiotherapy for high-risk spine metastases. The trial has received IRB approval, funding, and prospective registration (NCT05534321) and has been open to accrual since August 19, 2022. If positive, the trial will expand the scope and utility of spine radiotherapy.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT05534321 . Registered September 9, 2022.
TRIAL STATUS
METHODS
Version 2.0 of the protocol (2021-KOT-002), revised last on September 2, 2022, was approved by the WCG institutional review board (Study Number 1337188, IRB tracking number 20223735). The trial was first posted on ClinicalTrials.Gov on September 9, 2022 (NCT05534321). Patient enrollment commenced on August 19, 2022, and is expected to be completed in 2 years, likely by August 2024.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38217032
doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07850-8
pii: 10.1186/s13063-023-07850-8
doi:
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT05534321']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
41Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Mundy GR. Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2(8):584–93.
doi: 10.1038/nrc867
pubmed: 12154351
Rothrock RJ, Barzilai O, Reiner AS, Lis E, Schmitt AM, Higginson DS, et al. Survival trends after surgery for spinal metastatic tumors: 20-year cancer center experience. Neurosurgery. 2021;88(2):402–12.
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyaa380
pubmed: 32970144
Fisher CG, DiPaola CP, Ryken TC, Bilsky MH, Shaffrey CI, Berven SH, et al. A novel classification system for spinal instability in neoplastic disease: an evidence-based approach and expert consensus from the Spine Oncology Study Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35(22):E1221–9.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e16ae2
pubmed: 20562730
Lutz ST, Jones J, Chow E. Role of radiation therapy in palliative care of the patient with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32(26):2913–9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1143
pubmed: 25113773
pmcid: 4152720
Lutz S, Balboni T, Jones J, Lo S, Petit J, Rich SE, et al. Palliative radiation therapy for bone metastases: update of an ASTRO Evidence-Based Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2017;7(1):4–12.
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.08.001
pubmed: 27663933
Zimmermann C, Swami N, Krzyzanowska M, Hannon B, Leighl N, Oza A, et al. Early palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: a cluster-randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9930):1721–30.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62416-2
pubmed: 24559581
Rothrock RJ, Reiner AS, Barzilai O, Kim NC, Ogilvie SQ, Lis E, et al. Responder analysis of pain relief after surgery for the treatment of spinal metastatic tumors. Neurosurgery. 2022;91(4):604–17.
doi: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002083
pubmed: 35856981
pmcid: 10553165
Lipton A, Theriault RL, Hortobagyi GN, Simeone J, Knight RD, Mellars K, et al. Pamidronate prevents skeletal complications and is effective palliative treatment in women with breast carcinoma and osteolytic bone metastases: long term follow-up of two randomized, placebo-controlled trials. Cancer. 2000;88(5):1082–90.
doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(20000301)88:5<1082::AID-CNCR20>3.0.CO;2-Z
pubmed: 10699899
Saad F, Gleason DM, Murray R, Tchekmedyian S, Venner P, Lacombe L, et al. Long-term efficacy of zoledronic acid for the prevention of skeletal complications in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(11):879–82.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/djh141
pubmed: 15173273
Rosen LS, Gordon D, Tchekmedyian NS, Yanagihara R, Hirsh V, Krzakowski M, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma and other solid tumors: a randomized, Phase III, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Cancer. 2004;100(12):2613–21.
doi: 10.1002/cncr.20308
pubmed: 15197804
Stopeck A, Brufsky A, Kennedy L, Bhatta S, Bhowmik D, Buchanan J, et al. Cost-effectiveness of denosumab for the prevention of skeletal-related events in patients with solid tumors and bone metastases in the United States. J Med Econ. 2020;23(1):37–47.
doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1651122
pubmed: 31364885
Duran I, Fink MG, Bahl A, Hoefeler H, Mahmood A, Lüftner D, et al. Health resource utilisation associated with skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumours: regional comparisons in an observational study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2017:26(6).
Lüftner D, Lorusso V, Duran I, Hechmati G, Garzon-Rodriguez C, Ashcroft J, et al. Health resource utilization associated with skeletal-related events in patients with advanced breast cancer: results from a prospective, multinational observational study. Springerplus. 2014;3:328.
doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-328
pubmed: 25045611
pmcid: 4093906
Gillespie EF, Mathis NJ, Marine C, Zhang Z, Barker CA, Guttmann DM, et al. Prophylactic radiation therapy vs. standard-of-care for patients with high-risk, asymptomatic bone metastases: a multicenter, randomized phase II trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2022;114(5):1059.
doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.09.005
Chan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, Laupacis A, Gøtzsche PC, Krleža-Jerić K, et al. SPIRIT 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(3):200–7.
doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583
pubmed: 23295957
pmcid: 5114123
Butcher NJ, Monsour A, Mew EJ, Chan AW, Moher D, Mayo-Wilson E, et al. Guidelines for reporting outcomes in trial protocols: the SPIRIT-Outcomes 2022 extension. Jama. 2022;328(23):2345–56.
doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.21243
pubmed: 36512367
Ledesma Vicioso N, Lin D, Gomez DR, Yang JT, Lee NY, Rimner A, et al. Implementation strategies to increase clinical trial enrollment in a community-academic partnership and impact on Hispanic representation: an interrupted time series analysis. JCO Oncol Pract. 2022;18(5):e780–5.
doi: 10.1200/OP.22.00037
pubmed: 35544650
pmcid: 10166438
Stanhope J. Brief Pain Inventory review. Occup Med (Lond). 2016;66(6):496–7.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqw041
pubmed: 27067913
Jensen MP, Turner JA, Romano JM, Fisher LD. Comparative reliability and validity of chronic pain intensity measures. Pain. 1999;83(2):157–62.
doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(99)00101-3
pubmed: 10534586
Hartsell WF, Scott CB, Bruner DW, Scarantino CW, Ivker RA, Roach M 3rd, et al. Randomized trial of short- versus long-course radiotherapy for palliation of painful bone metastases. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97(11):798–804.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dji139
pubmed: 15928300
Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, Sarafian B, Linn E, Bonomi A, et al. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol. 1993;11(3):570–9.
doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.3.570
pubmed: 8445433
Brucker PS, Yost K, Cashy J, Webster K, Cella D. General population and cancer patient norms for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G). Eval Health Prof. 2005;28(2):192–211.
doi: 10.1177/0163278705275341
pubmed: 15851773
Teckle P, McTaggart-Cowan H, Van der Hoek K, Chia S, Melosky B, Gelmon K, et al. Mapping the FACT-G cancer-specific quality of life instrument to the EQ-5D and SF-6D. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:203.
doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-11-203
pubmed: 24289488
pmcid: 4220776
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33(5):337–43.
doi: 10.3109/07853890109002087
pubmed: 11491192
Badia X, Herdman M, Kind P. The influence of ill-health experience on the valuation of health. Pharmacoecon. 1998;13(6):687–96.
doi: 10.2165/00019053-199813060-00005
Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27.
doi: 10.1007/s11136-012-0322-4
pubmed: 23184421