Robotic-assisted surgery for gynecological indications in children and adolescents: European multicenter report.

Adolescents Children Gynecology Robot Robotic-assisted Tumors

Journal

Journal of robotic surgery
ISSN: 1863-2491
Titre abrégé: J Robot Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101300401

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
13 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 24 08 2023
accepted: 07 12 2023
medline: 13 1 2024
pubmed: 13 1 2024
entrez: 13 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is increasingly adopted in the pediatric population. This retrospective multicenter study aimed to report application of RAS for gynecological indications in pediatric patients. The medical records of all girls with gynecological pathology, operated in 4 different institutions over a 3-year period, were retrospectively collected. Robot docking time, total operative time, length of stay (LOS), requirement time of pain medication, complication rate, conversion rate, and pathology were analyzed. Twenty-three girls, with median age of 12.3 years (range 0.6-17.8) and median weight of 47.2 kg (range 9-73), received the following RAS procedures: ovarian cystectomy for ovarian cyst/mass (n = 10), salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian complex mass (n = 6), bilateral gonadectomy for Turner syndrome SRY + (n = 1), salpingectomy for fallopian tube lesion (n = 1), paratubal cyst excision (n = 1), Gartner cyst excision (n = 1), paravaginal ganglioneuroma resection (n = 1), fistula closure in urogenital sinus (n = 1), and vaginoplasty using ileal flap in cloaca malformation (n = 1). Median operative time was 144.9 min (range 64-360), and median docking time was 17.3 min (range 7-50). Conversion to open or laparoscopy was not necessary in any case. Median LOS was 2.1 days (range 1-7), and median analgesic requirement was 2.2 days (range 1-6). One patient (4.3%) needed redo-surgery for recurrent Gartner cyst (Clavien 3b). This preliminary experience showed that RAS is safe and feasible for surgical treatment of gynecological pathology in pediatric patients, although no conclusive data are available to confirm its superiority over traditional laparoscopy. Randomized, prospective, comparative studies are needed to identify the gold standard approach for such indication.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38217834
doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01767-9
pii: 10.1007/s11701-023-01767-9
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

20

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239:14–21
doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d pubmed: 14685095 pmcid: 1356187
Mucksavage P, Kerbl DC, Lee JY (2011) The da Vinci(R) Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance. J Endourol 25:1385–1388
doi: 10.1089/end.2011.0093 pubmed: 21815795
Spinoit AF, Nguyen H, Subramaniam R (2017) Role of robotics in children: a brave New World! Eur Urol Focus 3(2–3):172–180
doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2017.08.011 pubmed: 28889938
Andolfi C, Kumar R, Boysen WR, Gundeti MS (2019) Current status of robotic surgery in pediatric urology. J Laparoend Adv Surg Tech Part A 29(2):159–166
doi: 10.1089/lap.2018.0745
Denning NL, Kallis MP, Prince JM (2020) Pediatric robotic surgery. Surg Clin North Am 100(2):431–443
doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2019.12.004 pubmed: 32169188
Fuchs ME, DaJusta DG (2020) Robotics in pediatric urology. Int Braz J Urol 46(3):322–327
doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.99.03 pubmed: 31961623 pmcid: 7088494
Fernandez N, Farhat WA (2019) A comprehensive analysis of robot-assisted surgery uptake in the pediatric surgical discipline. Front Surg 6:9
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2019.00009 pubmed: 30915338 pmcid: 6422870
Mei H, Tang S (2023) Robotic-assisted surgery in the pediatric surgeons’ world: current situation and future prospectives. Front Pediatr 11:1120831
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1120831 pubmed: 36865692 pmcid: 9971628
Varda BK, Wang Y, Chung BI, Lee RS, Kurtz MP, Nelson CP, Chang SL (2018) Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015. J Pediatr Urol 14(4):336.e1-336.e8
doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.12.010 pubmed: 29530407
Light A, Karthikeyan S, Maruthan S, Elhage O, Danuser H, Dasgupta P (2018) Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 122(2):181–194
doi: 10.1111/bju.14170 pubmed: 29453902
Lee NG, Corbett ST, Cobb K, Bailey GC, Burns AS, Peters CA (2015) Bi-institutional comparison of robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open ureteroureterostomy in the pediatric population. J Endourol 29(11):1237–1241
doi: 10.1089/end.2015.0223 pubmed: 26159231
Koga H, Murakami H, Ochi T, Miyano G, Lane GJ, Yamataka A (2019) Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic hepaticojejunostomy for choledochal cyst in children: a first report. Pediatr Surg Int 35(12):1421–1425
doi: 10.1007/s00383-019-04565-3 pubmed: 31555861
Nakib G, Calcaterra V, Scorletti F, Romano P, Goruppi I, Mencherini S, Avolio L, Pelizzo G (2013) Robotic assisted surgery in pediatric gynecology: promising innovation in mini invasive surgical procedures. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 26(1):e5–e7
doi: 10.1016/j.jpag.2012.09.009 pubmed: 23158752
Xie XX, Wang N, Wang ZH, Zhu YY, Wang JR, Wang XQ (2019) Robotic-assisted resection of ovarian tumors in children: A case report and review of literature. World J Clin Cases 7(17):2542–2548
doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i17.2542 pubmed: 31559290 pmcid: 6745331
Xu D, Gao H, Yu S, Huang G, Lu D, Yang K, Zhang W, Zhang W (2022) Ensuring safety and feasibility for resection of pediatric benign ovarian tumors by single-port robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci Xi system. Front Surg 9:944662
doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.944662 pubmed: 36061048 pmcid: 9437548
Peters CA (2004) Laparoscopic and robotic approach to genitourinary anomalies in children. Urol Clin North Am 31:595
doi: 10.1016/j.ucl.2004.04.022 pubmed: 15313068
Chang C, Steinberg Z, Shah A, Gundeti MS (2014) Patient positioning and port placement for robot-assisted surgery. J Endourol 28:631–638
doi: 10.1089/end.2013.0733 pubmed: 24548088 pmcid: 4382714
Esposito C, Settimi A, Del Conte F, Cerulo M, Coppola V, Farina A, Crocetto F, Ricciardi E, Esposito G, Escolino M (2020) Image-guided pediatric surgery using Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence in laparoscopic and robotic surgery. Front Pediatr 8:314
doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00314 pubmed: 32626676 pmcid: 7311575
Ciro E, Vincenzo C, Mariapina C, Fulvia DC, Vincenzo B, Giorgia E, Roberto C, Lepore B, Castagnetti M, Califano G, Escolino M (2022) Review of a 25-Year experience in the management of ovarian masses in neonates, children and adolescents: from laparoscopy to robotics and indocyanine green fluorescence technology. Children (Basel) 9(8):1219
pubmed: 36010109
Abdelhafeez A, Talbot L, Murphy AJ, Davidoff AM (2021) Indocyanine green-guided pediatric tumor resection: approach, utility, and challenges. Front Pediatr 9:689612
doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.689612 pubmed: 34616696 pmcid: 8489593

Auteurs

Ciro Esposito (C)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Thomas Blanc (T)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Hôpital Necker-Enfants Malades, Paris, France.

Claudia Di Mento (C)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Quentin Ballouhey (Q)

Pediatric Surgery Division, University Hospital, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.

Laurent Fourcade (L)

Pediatric Surgery Division, University Hospital, CHU de Limoges, Limoges, France.

Mario Mendoza-Sagaon (M)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Annalisa Chiodi (A)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.

Roberto Cardone (R)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (EOC), Bellinzona, Switzerland.

Maria Escolino (M)

Pediatric Surgery Division, Federico II University Hospital, Via Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy. x.escolino@libero.it.

Classifications MeSH