Accuracy of zirconia crown manufactured using stereolithography and digital light processing.

Accuracy Digital light processing Stereolithography Subtractive manufacturing Zirconia

Journal

Journal of dentistry
ISSN: 1879-176X
Titre abrégé: J Dent
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0354422

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
10 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 26 01 2023
revised: 30 12 2023
accepted: 07 01 2024
medline: 14 1 2024
pubmed: 14 1 2024
entrez: 13 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of zirconia crowns fabricated using stereolithography (SLA) and digital light processing (DLP) and to compare their accuracy with those fabricated using the subtractive manufacturing (SM) method. A typodont model with a prepared maxillary first molar was scanned, and the anatomical contour crown was designed using dental computer-aided-design (CAD) software. The designed file in standard tessellation language (STL) format was used to fabricate 10 crowns per group. The crowns were manufactured using a dental milling machine (Datron D5; MLC group), SLA (CERAMAKER 900; SLAC group), and DLP (ZIPRO; DLPC group) printers. The fabricated crowns were scanned using a dental laboratory scanner and saved in three parts: the external, intaglio, and marginal surfaces. For accuracy assessment, these parts were superimposed to the reference file. Root mean square (RMS) values were evaluated using three-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic Control X). Statistical significance was evaluated using a nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05) and a post-hoc Mann-Whitney U test with Bonferroni correction (α = 0.016). Trueness evaluation revealed the lowest RMS value in all areas in the MLC group, followed by that in the DLPC group. The precision evaluation revealed the lowest RMS value in all areas in the MLC group. Statistically significant differences were observed among the groups in the external, intaglio, and marginal surface (P < 0.05). Although the restorations fabricated using SM revealed higher accuracy, the crowns manufactured using SLA and DLP methods were considered clinically acceptable. In the production of zirconia crowns, subtractive manufacturing continues to demonstrate significantly higher accuracy compared to additive manufacturing. However, crowns fabricated using the additive manufacturing method also demonstrated high accuracy.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38217958
pii: S0300-5712(24)00004-6
doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.104834
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

104834

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The Authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Ha-Bin Lee (HB)

Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Hana Sciences Hall B #374, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Mi-Jun Noh (MJ)

Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Hana Sciences Hall B #374, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea.

Eun-Jeong Bae (EJ)

Department Of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, 56, Sosa-ro, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Wan-Sun Lee (WS)

Department Of Dental Technology, Bucheon University, 56, Sosa-ro, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.

Ji-Hwan Kim (JH)

Transdisciplinary Major in Learning Health Systems, Department of Healthcare Sciences, Graduate School, Korea University, Hana Sciences Hall B #374, 145, Anam-ro, Seongbuk-gu, Seoul, Korea. Electronic address: kjh2804@korea.ac.kr.

Classifications MeSH