Health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes for magnetically controlled growing rod patients after treatment termination.

Definitive fusion Early onset scoliosis Growth-friendly treatment Magnetically controlled growing rods

Journal

Spine deformity
ISSN: 2212-1358
Titre abrégé: Spine Deform
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101603979

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
14 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 09 03 2023
accepted: 02 12 2023
medline: 14 1 2024
pubmed: 14 1 2024
entrez: 14 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and clinical outcomes of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) followed to definitive fusion (DF). A retrospective review of EOS patients treated with MCGR and followed to DF was performed. Outcomes included HRQoL scores, radiographic, clinical, and unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR) data collected at pre-MCGR implantation, immediately post-MCGR implantation, pre-DF, and post-DF. HRQoL scores were collected at least 6 months post-DF. Twenty-eight patients (57.1% females, mean age at MCGR insertion 7.19 ± 1.5 years, mean pre-MCGR Cobb 64.7° ± 17.6) met inclusion criteria. MCGR treatment resulted in an overall 30.2% improvement in coronal plane deformity following DF. The mean growth rates between MCGR implantation and pre-DF for T1-T12 height and T1-S1 length were 0.33 ± 0.23 mm/month and 0.49 ± 0.28 mm/month, respectively. Of the 28 included patients, 26 (92.9%) experienced at least one UPROR, with a total of 52 surgical complications occurring in the total cohort, representing 1.9 UPROR/patient. Interestingly, there was a decline in scores reported between post-MCGR implantation and the pre-DF time-point (N = 16, 78.2 ± 14.9 vs 69.7 ± 17.8, p = 0.02). These scores recovered post-DF, resulting in an overall unchanged HRQoL when comparing pre-MCGR to post-DF (N = 11, 79.9 ± 15.1 vs 76.7 ± 17.9, p = 0.44). While MCGR treatment achieves coronal plane deformity control and facilitates spinal growth, only 7.1% of children experienced a complication-free treatment course when followed to definitive fusion. Patients achieved modest curve correction and spinal growth, while maintaining stable HRQoL outcomes between pre-MCGR and post-DF.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38219256
doi: 10.1007/s43390-023-00801-y
pii: 10.1007/s43390-023-00801-y
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.

Références

Guzek RH, Murphy R, Hardesty CK et al (2022) Mortality in early-onset scoliosis during the growth-friendly surgery era. J Pediatr Orthop 42:131–137
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000001983 pubmed: 35138296
El-Hawary R, Akbarnia BA (2015) Early onset scoliosis—time for consensus. Spine Deformity 3:105–106
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2015.01.003 pubmed: 27927299
Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA, Flynn JM et al (2014) A classification of growth friendly spine implants. J Pediatr Orthop 34:260–274
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000000073 pubmed: 23995146
Migliorini F, Chiu WO, Scrofani R et al (2022) Magnetically controlled growing rods in the management of early onset scoliosis: a systematic review. J Orthop Surg Res 17:309
doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03200-7 pubmed: 35690867 pmcid: 9188689
Akbarnia BA, Pawelek JB, Cheung KMC et al (2014) Traditional growing rods versus magnetically controlled growing rods for the surgical treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched 2-year study. Spine Deform 2:493–497
doi: 10.1016/j.jspd.2014.09.050 pubmed: 27927412
Matsumoto H, Skaggs DL, Akbarnia BA et al (2021) Comparing health-related quality of life and burden of care between early-onset scoliosis patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods and traditional growing rods: a multicenter study. Spine Deform 9:239–245
doi: 10.1007/s43390-020-00173-7 pubmed: 32851598
Derderian CA, Szmuk P, Derderian CK (2017) Behind the black box: the evidence for the U.S. food and drug administration warning about the risk of general anesthesia in children younger than 3 years. Plast Reconstr Surg 140:787
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003691 pubmed: 28953732
Lebel DE, Rocos B, Helenius I et al (2021) Magnetically controlled growing rods graduation: deformity control with high complication rate. Spine 46:E1105–E1112
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004044 pubmed: 34559751
Murphy RF, Neel GB, Barfield WR et al (2022) Trends in the utilization of implants in index procedures for early onset scoliosis from the pediatric spine study group. J Pediatr Orthop 42:e912–e916
doi: 10.1097/BPO.0000000000002221 pubmed: 35941094
Welborn MC, Bouton D (2022) Outcomes of MCGR at > 3 year average follow-up in severe scoliosis: who undergoes elective revision vs UPROR? Spine Deform 10:457–463
doi: 10.1007/s43390-021-00424-1 pubmed: 34648137
Cheung JPY, Yiu K, Kwan K et al (2019) Mean 6-year follow-up of magnetically controlled growing rod patients with early onset scoliosis: a glimpse of what happens to graduates. Neurosurgery 84:1112–1123
doi: 10.1093/neuros/nyy270 pubmed: 30102378
Tahir M, Mehta D, Sandhu C et al (2022) A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods. Bone Joint J 104-B:257–264
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.104B2.BJJ-2021-1198.R1 pubmed: 35094579
Rushton PRP, Smith SL, Forbes L et al (2019) Force testing of explanted magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine 44:233–239
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002806 pubmed: 30044365
Shaw KA, Bassett P, Ramo BA et al (2023) The evolving stall rate of magnetically controlled growing rods beyond 2 years follow-up. Spine Deform 11:487–493
doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00622-5 pubmed: 36447049
Ramo BA, McClung A, Jo C-H et al (2021) Effect of etiology, radiographic severity, and comorbidities on baseline parent-reported health measures for children with early-onset scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 103:803–811
doi: 10.2106/JBJS.20.00819 pubmed: 33439608
Doany ME, Olgun ZD, Kinikli GI et al (2018) Health-related quality of life in early-onset scoliosis patients treated surgically: EOSQ scores in traditional growing rod versus magnetically controlled growing rods. Spine 43:148–153
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002274 pubmed: 28604490
Shaw KA, Ramo B, McClung A et al (2023) Impact of surgical treatment on parent-reported health related quality of life measures in early-onset scoliosis: stable but no improvement at 2 years. Spine Deform 11:213–223
doi: 10.1007/s43390-022-00572-y pubmed: 36181618
Hell AK, Braunschweig L, Behrend J et al (2019) Health-related quality of life in early-onset-scoliosis patients treated with growth-friendly implants is influenced by etiology, complication rate and ambulatory ability. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20:588
doi: 10.1186/s12891-019-2969-2 pubmed: 31810446 pmcid: 6898924

Auteurs

Adam A Jamnik (AA)

University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

K Aaron Shaw (KA)

Department of Pediatric Orthopaedic Surgery, Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, MO, USA.

David Thornberg (D)

Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA.

Anna McClung (A)

Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA.

Chan-Hee Jo (CH)

Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA.

Brandon Ramo (B)

Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA.

Amy McIntosh (A)

Department of Pediatric Orthopedic Surgery, Scottish Rite for Children, 2222 Welborn St, Dallas, TX, 75219, USA. Amy.McIntosh@tsrh.org.

Classifications MeSH