Changes in passive hamstring stiffness after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A prospective study with comparison of healthy controls.

Anterior cruciate ligament graft Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction Hamstrings Muscle stiffness Muscle strength

Journal

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 07 2023
revised: 05 12 2023
accepted: 29 12 2023
medline: 15 1 2024
pubmed: 15 1 2024
entrez: 14 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The mechanical properties of knee flexors muscles contribute to reducing anterior cruciate ligament loading. This case-control study evaluated the passive knee flexors stiffness after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with comparison of healthy controls. After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 88 participants (24.5 [8.6] years, 56,8% males) had two isokinetic tests at 4 and 8 postoperative months with measurement of the passive resistive torque of knee flexors and extensors/flexors strength. In the control group, 44 participants (24.5 [4.3] years, 56,8% males) had one visit with the same procedures. Passive knee flexors stiffness was calculated as the slope of the passive torque-angle curve on the last 10° of knee extension (Nm/°). We investigated the impact of timing and type of surgery (autograft and combined meniscus repair) and persistent knee extension deficits on knee flexors stiffness. At 4 and 8 postoperative months, passive knee flexors stiffness was lower on the operated limb than on the non-operated limb (P < 0.001) but both limbs had significant lower values than controls (P < 0.001). Stiffness was positively correlated with knee flexors strength (P < 0.010), and knee flexors stiffness at 4 months was lower in individuals who underwent surgery <6 months from injury (P = 0.040). Knee extension deficit or the type of surgery did not have a significant influence on knee flexors stiffness. Similarly to neuromuscular factors that are traditionally altered after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, evaluating passive knee flexors stiffness changes over time could provide supplementary insights into postoperative muscle recovery.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The mechanical properties of knee flexors muscles contribute to reducing anterior cruciate ligament loading. This case-control study evaluated the passive knee flexors stiffness after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with comparison of healthy controls.
METHODS METHODS
After anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, 88 participants (24.5 [8.6] years, 56,8% males) had two isokinetic tests at 4 and 8 postoperative months with measurement of the passive resistive torque of knee flexors and extensors/flexors strength. In the control group, 44 participants (24.5 [4.3] years, 56,8% males) had one visit with the same procedures. Passive knee flexors stiffness was calculated as the slope of the passive torque-angle curve on the last 10° of knee extension (Nm/°). We investigated the impact of timing and type of surgery (autograft and combined meniscus repair) and persistent knee extension deficits on knee flexors stiffness.
FINDINGS RESULTS
At 4 and 8 postoperative months, passive knee flexors stiffness was lower on the operated limb than on the non-operated limb (P < 0.001) but both limbs had significant lower values than controls (P < 0.001). Stiffness was positively correlated with knee flexors strength (P < 0.010), and knee flexors stiffness at 4 months was lower in individuals who underwent surgery <6 months from injury (P = 0.040). Knee extension deficit or the type of surgery did not have a significant influence on knee flexors stiffness.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
Similarly to neuromuscular factors that are traditionally altered after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, evaluating passive knee flexors stiffness changes over time could provide supplementary insights into postoperative muscle recovery.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38219455
pii: S0268-0033(23)00299-1
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2023.106168
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

106168

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Joffrey Drigny (J)

Service de Médecine Physique et de Réadaptation, Service de Médecine du Sport, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France. Electronic address: drigny-j@chu-caen.fr.

Emmanuel Reboursière (E)

Service de Médecine du Sport, CHU de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France.

Cesar Praz (C)

Département d'orthopédie et de traumatologie, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CHU de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France.

Henri Guermont (H)

Service de Médecine du Sport, CHU de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France.

Christophe Hulet (C)

Département d'orthopédie et de traumatologie, Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France.

Antoine Gauthier (A)

Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, INSERM, COMETE, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France.

Classifications MeSH