Peritonectomy and resection of mesentery during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer: A phase I-II trial.

Cytoreductive surgery Debulking Mesentery Meso Ovarian cancer Peritonectomy Visceral peritoneal debulking

Journal

European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology
ISSN: 1532-2157
Titre abrégé: Eur J Surg Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8504356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
09 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 21 06 2023
revised: 19 12 2023
accepted: 08 01 2024
medline: 15 1 2024
pubmed: 15 1 2024
entrez: 14 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To describe the surgical technique, assess feasibility, efficacy, and safety of peritonectomy and/or resection of mesentery (P-Rme) during Visceral-Peritoneal Debulking (VPD) in patients with stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer (OC). In April 2009 we registered a protocol study on the safety and feasibility of P-Rme. In the period April 2009-December 2022, 687 patients with FIGO stage IIIC-IV ovarian cancer underwent VPD. One hundred and twenty-nine patients (18.7%) had extensive disease on the mesentery and underwent P-Rme. Feasibility was assessed as the number of procedures completed. Efficacy was measured as the rate of Complete Resection (CR). Safety was defined by the intra- and post-operative morbidity rate specifically associated with these procedures. In all patients P-Rme was successfully completed. P-me was performed in 82 patients and R-me in 47, both procedures in 23 patients. CR was achieved in all 129 patients with an efficacy of 100%. Intra-operatively 5 patients out of 129 experienced small bowel loop surgical devascularization. They required small bowel resection and anastomosis. The procedure specific morbidity was 3.8%. No post-operative complication was related to P-Rme. At 64 months median follow-up, survival outcomes in the study group were similar to patients in the control group. Overall, almost 20% of the VPD patients needed P-Rme to obtain a CR. P-Rme was a safe and effective step during VPD. The rate of CR in the study group was 100% achieved thanks to the addition of the P-Rme. No procedure specific post-operative complications occurred but 3.8% of the patients had unplanned additional surgery related to these procedures.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38219700
pii: S0748-7983(24)00009-X
doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.107957
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

107957

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest None.

Auteurs

Roberto Tozzi (R)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy. Electronic address: roberto.tozzi@unipd.it.

Marco Noventa (M)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Giulia Spagnol (G)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Orazio De Tommasi (O)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Davide Coldebella (D)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Matteo Tamagnini (M)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Sofia Bigardi (S)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Carlo Saccardi (C)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Matteo Marchetti (M)

Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Padova University Hospital, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.

Classifications MeSH