Adopting the service system view toward successful implementation of assistive technologies.
assistive technology
nursing care
robotics
service system view
stakeholder participation
Journal
Geriatrics & gerontology international
ISSN: 1447-0594
Titre abrégé: Geriatr Gerontol Int
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101135738
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
14 Jan 2024
14 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised:
26
11
2023
received:
31
08
2023
accepted:
14
12
2023
medline:
15
1
2024
pubmed:
15
1
2024
entrez:
14
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
This study aims to provide an overview of the service system view (SSV), and the current status of its adoption for the development and implementation of assistive technology (AT). The role of ATs in the global aging scenario is anticipated; however, their diffusion is cumbersome. The SSV captures stakeholders, technologies, and their interactions as integrated systems. Based on this perspective, several approaches for designing long-term care services have been proposed that would be helpful for the successful implementation of ATs. However, the existing geriatrics and gerontology literature seldom addresses these topics. Based on a literature review, this study first illustrates the challenges of using ATs in the real world. The existing literature highlights the sociotechnical challenges of utilizing ATs, such as the changes required in care work and resistance to them. To overcome the challenges, three approaches associated with the SSV have been introduced: service design, service engineering and living labs. This paper also introduces recent national projects in Japan that have adopted these approaches. As the importance of the SSV is growing for the successful implementation of ATs, the ability to adopt the SSV and its approaches is anticipated. In relation to geriatrics and gerontology studies, the impact on older adults' quality of life, as well as the economic effect, needs to be analyzed in future research. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Subventions
Organisme : Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : KAKENHI JP19KT0022
Organisme : Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
ID : KAKENHI JP22K12286
Informations de copyright
© 2024 The Authors. Geriatrics & Gerontology International published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japan Geriatrics Society.
Références
Statistics Bureau of Japan. Statistical Handbook of Japan, 2022. [cited 2023 Nov 23]. Available from: https://www.stat.go.jp/english/data/handbook/pdf/2022all.pdf.
MHLW. Actions toward ensuring human resources for care, 2021. [cited 2023 Aug 24]. Available from: https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/newpage_02977.html.
Obi T, Ishmatova D, Iwasaki N. Promoting ICT innovations for the ageing population in Japan. Int J Med Inform 2013; 82: e47-e62.
Ishiguro N. Care robots in Japanese elderly care. In: Christensen K, Pilling D, eds. The Routledge Handbook of Social Care Work Around the World. London: Routledge, 2018; 256-269.
MHLW. The Prioritized Areas of Robotic Technologies for Care, 2017. [cited 2023 Nov 23]. Available from: https://robotcare.jp/data/partnership/10thPartnership_01.pdf.
Trainum K, Tunis R, Xie B, Hauser E. Robots in assisted living facilities: scoping review. JMIR Aging 2023; 6: e42652.
Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L. Effectiveness of robot Paro in intramural psychogeriatric care: a multicenter quasi-experimental study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2015; 16: 946-950.
Sarabia M, Young N, Canavan K, Edginton T, Demiris Y, Vizcaychipi MP. Assistive robotic technology to combat social isolation in acute hospital settings. Int J Soc Robot 2018; 10: 607-620.
Bao G, Pan L, Fang H et al. Academic review and perspectives on robotic exoskeletons. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2019; 27: 2294-2304.
Sale P, Franceschini M, Waldner A, Hesse S. Use of the robot assisted gait therapy in rehabilitation of patients with stroke and spinal cord injury. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2012; 48: 111-121.
Hoppe JA, Melkas H, Pekkarinen S et al. Perception of society's trust in care robots by public opinion leaders. Int J Hum Comput Interact 2023; 39: 2589-2605.
Tuovila H, Watanabe K, Hyytinen K. Elderly care services in the future: the role of technology. In: Elgar Encyclopedia of Services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2023; 559-560.
Watanabe K, Hyytinen K, Tuovila H. Challenges in integrating assistive technologies into elderly care services-comparative study between Japan and Finland. Eur Rev Serv Econ Manage 2018; 6: 97-122.
Lehoux P, Grimard D. When robots care: public deliberations on how technology and humans may support independent living for older adults. Soc Sci Med 2018; 211: 330-337.
Na E, Jung Y, Kim S. How do care service managers and workers perceive care robot adoption in elderly care facilities? Technol Forecast Soc Change 2023; 187: 122250.
Čaić M, Odekerken-Schröder G, Mahr D. Service robots: value co-creation and co-destruction in elderly care networks. J Serv Manag 2018; 29: 178-205.
Sparrow R. Robots in aged care: a dystopian future? AI Soc 2016; 31: 445-454.
Broadbent E, Kerse N, Peri K et al. Benefits and problems of health-care robots in aged care settings: a comparison trial. Australas J Ageing 2016; 35: 23-29.
Lanne M, Tuisku O, Melkas H, Niemelä M. My business or not? The perspective of technology companies on shifting towards care robotics. Eur Plan Stud 2020; 28: 296-318.
Chou Y-H, Wang S-YB, Lin Y-T. Long-term care and technological innovation: the application and policy development of care robots in Taiwan. J Asian Public Policy 2018; 12: 104-123.
Johansson-Pajala RM, Gustafsson C. Significant challenges when introducing care robots in Swedish elder care. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2022; 17: 166-176.
Andtfolk M, Nyholm L, Eide H, Fagerström L. Humanoid robots in the care of older persons: a scoping review. Assist Technol 2022; 34: 518-526.
Melkas H, Hennala L, Pekkarinen S, Kyrki V. Impacts of robot implementation on care personnel and clients in elderly-care institutions. Int J Med Inform 2020; 134: 104041.
Pekkarinen S, Tuisku O, Hennala L, Melkas H. Robotics in Finnish welfare services: dynamics in an emerging innovation ecosystem. Eur Plan Stud 2020; 28: 1513-1533.
Hoffmann L, Krämer NC. The persuasive power of robot touch. Behavioral and evaluative consequences of non-functional touch from a robot. PLoS One 2021; 16: e0249554.
Ke C, Lou VW, Tan KC, Wai MY, Chan LL. Changes in technology acceptance among older people with dementia: the role of social robot engagement. Int J Med Inform 2020; 141: 104241.
Edvardsson B, Olsson J. Key concepts for new service development. Serv Ind J 1996; 16: 140-164.
Sakao T, Shimomura Y, Sundin E, Comstock M. Modeling design objects in CAD system for service/product engineering. Comput Aid Des 2009; 41: 197-213.
Shimomura Y, Hara T, Arai T. A unified representation scheme for effective PSS development. CIRP Ann 2009; 58: 379-382.
Shaw J, Agarwal P, Desveaux L et al. Beyond “implementation”: digital health innovation and service design. NPJ Digit Med 2018; 1: 48.
Koskela-Huotari K, Patrício L, Zhang J et al. Service system transformation through service design: linking analytical dimensions and service design approaches. J Bus Res 2021; 136: 343-355.
Watanabe K, Niemelä M. Aging and technology in Japan and Finland: comparative remarks. In: oivonen M, Saari M, eds. Human-Centered Digitalization and Services. Singapore: Springer, 2019; 155-175.
Watanabe K, Mochimaru M. Expanding impacts of technology-assisted service systems through generalization: case study of the Japanese service engineering research project. Serv Sci 2017; 9: 250-262.
Patrício L, Sangiorgi D, Mahr D, Čaić M, Kalantari S, Sundar S. Leveraging service design for healthcare transformation: toward people-centered, integrated, and technology-enabled healthcare systems. J Serv Manage 2020; 31: 889-909.
Compagna D, Kohlbacher F. The limits of participatory technology development: the case of service robots in care facilities for older people. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2015; 93: 19-31.
Watanabe K, Miwa H, Wakui T. Technology integration in care service systems: the required actions of technology developers. IEEE Eng Manage Rev 2023; 51: 129-142.
Bitner MJ, Ostrom AL, Morgan FN. Service blueprinting: a practical technique for service innovation. Calif Manage Rev 2008; 50: 66-94.
Shostack LG. How to design a service. Eur J Mark 1982; 16: 49-63.
Zomerdijk LG, Voss CA. Service design for experience-centric services. J Serv Res 2010; 13: 67-82.
Vink J, Koskela-Huotari K, Tronvoll B, Edvardsson B, Wetter-Edman K. Service ecosystem design: propositions, process model, and future research agenda. J Serv Res 2021; 24: 168-186.
Parish JT, Berry LL, Shun YL. The effect of the servicescape on service workers. J Serv Res 2008; 10: 220-238.
Stickdorn M, Hormess ME, Lawrence A, Schneider J. This Is Service Design Doing: Applying Service Design Thinking in the Real World. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media, 2018.
Steen M, Manschot M, De Koning N. Benefits of co-design in service design projects. Int J Des 2011; 5: 53-60.
Sakao T, Shimomura Y. Service engineering: a novel engineering discipline for producers to increase value combining service and product. J Cleaner Prod 2007; 15: 590-604.
Watanabe K, Takenaka T, Okuma T. Digitalization toward innovative workplaces: service engineering research in Japan. In: Mcmurray A, Muenjohn N, Weerakoon C, eds. The Palgrave Handbook of Workplace Innovation. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2021; 243-258.
Watanabe K, Okuma T, Takenaka T. Evolutionary design framework for smart PSS: service engineering approach. Adv Eng Inform 2020; 45: 101119.
Zheng P, Wang Z, Chen C-H, Pheng KL. A survey of smart product-service systems: key aspects, challenges and future perspectives. Adv Eng Inform 2019; 42: 100973.
Watanabe K, Fukuda K, Nishimura T. A technology-assisted design methodology for employee-driven innovation in services. Technol Innov Manage Rev 2015; 5: 6-14.
Sugihara T, Hirabayashi Y, Torii K, Chino T, Uchihira N. A pilot study in using a smart voice messaging system to create a reflection-in-caregiving workshop. Universal access in human-computer interaction aging and assistive environments. Lect Notes Comput Sci 2014; 8515: 387-394.
Fukuda R, Shinjo A, Kudo M, Ono Y, Murai J. Kizkey is the key to a better care. In: Sawatani Y, Spohrer J, Kwan S, Takenaka T, eds. Serviceology for Smart Service System. ICServ 2015. Tokyo: Springer, 2017; 261-268.
Hossain M, Leminen S, Westerlund M. A systematic review of living lab literature. J Cleaner Prod 2019; 213: 976-988.
ENoLL. What are Living Labs n.d. [cited 2023 Nov 23]. Available from: https://enoll.org/about-us/.
Akasaka F, Yasuoka M, Nakatani M, Kimura A, Ihara M. Patterns for living lab practice: describing key know-how to promote service co-creation with users. Int J Autom Technol 2020; 14: 769-778.
Yasuoka M, Akasaka F, Kimura A, Ihara M. Living labs as a methodology for service design-An analysis based on cases and discussions from a systems approach viewpoint. In: Proceedings of the DESIGN 2018 15th International Design Conference. Glasgow: The Design Society, 2018; 127-136.
Akasaka F, Mitake Y, Watanabe K, Shimomura Y. A framework for “configuring participation” in living labs. Des Sci 2022; 8: e28.
Äyväri A, Hirvikoski T. Review of Finnish Social and Health Care Ecosystems' Websites Supporting the Co-creation and Testing of Innovations. Laurea Publications, 2021.
Malmborg L, Light A, Fitzpatrick G, Bellotti V, Brereton M. Designing for sharing in local communities. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery, 2015; 2357-2360.
Akiyama H. Aging well: an update. Nutr Rev 2020; 78: 3-9.
Kimura A, Haraguchi H, Yamauchi Y, Matsuura K. Social system design methodology for transitioning to a new social structure. Open Living Lab Days 2022; 2022: 20-22.
MHLW. “Platform to Develop, Test and Disseminate Care Robotics toward Productivity Improvement of Care Workplaces" project website. [cited 2023 Aug 17]. Available from: https://www.kaigo-pf.com.
Kushibiki K. Ministerial policy of promoting development and integration of robotic devices for nursing care. Sogo Rehabilitation 2019; 47: 203-210.
Kajitani I, Watanabe K, Miwa H, Shimizu Y, Nakabo Y. Developing a guidance for evaluating care robots. Life 2022; 2022: 19-21.
Watanabe K, Miwa H, Kajitani I. Applicability of service design and living lab approaches to the evaluation process of care robotics. Life 2022; 2022: 19-21.
Watanabe K, Miwa H, Kajitani I. Utilization of service design and living lab for in-field evaluation process of robotic care devices: A survey for guidance development. In: Proceedings of the 11th domestic conference of Serviceology; March 8-10, 2023.