The Invisible Scars: Unseen Financial Complications Worsen Every Aspect of Long-Term Health in Trauma Survivors.


Journal

The journal of trauma and acute care surgery
ISSN: 2163-0763
Titre abrégé: J Trauma Acute Care Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101570622

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jan 2024
Historique:
pubmed: 16 1 2024
medline: 16 1 2024
entrez: 16 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Trauma survivors are susceptible to experiencing financial toxicity (FT). Studies have shown the negative impact of FT on chronic illness outcomes. However, there is a notable lack of data on FT in the context of trauma. We aimed to better understand prevalence, risk factors, and impact of FT on trauma long-term outcomes. Adult trauma patients with an Injury severity score (ISS) ≥9 treated at level-1 trauma centers were interviewed 6-14 months after discharge. FT was considered positive if patients reported any of the following due to the injury: income loss, lack of care, newly applied/qualified for governmental assistance, new financial problems, or work loss. The Impact of FT on Patient Reported Outcome Measure Index System (PROMIS) health domains was investigated. Of 577 total patients, 44% (254/567) suffered some form of FT. In the adjusted model, older age (OR 0.4 [95% CI: 0.2 - 0.81]) and stronger social support networks (OR 0.44 [ 95% CI: 0.26 - 0.74]) were protective against FT. In contrast, having two or more comorbidities (OR 1.81 [1.01 - 3.28), lower education levels (OR = 1.95, [CI 95%: 1.26 - 3.03]), and injury mechanisms, including road accidents (OR 2.69 [1.51 -4.77]) and intentional injuries (OR 4.31 [1.44 -12.86]) were associated with higher toxicity. No significant relationship was found with ISS, sex, or single-family household. Patients with FT had worse outcomes across all domains of health. There was a negative linear relationship between the severity of FT and worse mental and physical health scores. FT is associated with long-term outcomes. Incorporating FT risk assessment into recovery care planning may help to identify patients most in need of mitigative interventions across the trauma care continuum to improve trauma recovery. Further investigations to better understand, define, and address FT in trauma care are warranted. Prognostic cohort study, level III.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38227675
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000004247
pii: 01586154-990000000-00616
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts of Interest: Author Disclosure forms have been supplied and are provided as Supplemental Digital Content ( http://links.lww.com/TA/D513 ).

Auteurs

Saba Ilkhani (S)

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Abbie E Naus (AE)

Beth Israel Lahey Health, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, MA.

Nathaniel Pinkes (N)

Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Wardah Rafaqat (W)

Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Ben Grobman (B)

School of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Sabrina E Sanchez (SE)

Division of Trauma, Acute Care Surgery & Surgical Critical Care, Boston Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.

John O Hwabejire (JO)

Division of Trauma, Emergency Surgery, and Surgical Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

John W Scott (JW)

Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center. Seattle, WA.

Ali Salim (A)

Division of Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.

Classifications MeSH