Evaluation of the Hydrophilic, Cohesive, and Physical Properties of Eight Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: Clinical Implications of Gel Differentiation.

NASHA Non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid OBT Optimal balance technology aesthetics

Journal

Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology
ISSN: 1178-7015
Titre abrégé: Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol
Pays: New Zealand
ID NLM: 101543449

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 25 10 2023
accepted: 25 12 2023
medline: 17 1 2024
pubmed: 17 1 2024
entrez: 17 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are used to treat an array of aesthetic indications. Proper filler selection is paramount for successful patient outcomes. However, many important physiochemical and physical properties that impact HA gel behavior remain undefined. To evaluate the hydrophilicity, cohesivity and particle size of eight commercial HA fillers manufactured by either Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid (NASHA) or Optimal Balance Technology (OBT) techniques. Three individual in vitro experiments were performed to assess HA swelling capacity, cohesion, and particle size. Image analyses, blinded evaluation using the Gavard-Sundaram Cohesivity Scale, and laser diffraction technology were utilized, respectively. Compared to fillers manufactured with NASHA technology, OBT products demonstrated greater swelling capacity, cohesion, and wider particle size distributions. Strong positive correlations between swelling factor, degree of cohesivity, and increasing widths of the particle size distributions were observed. The hydrophilicity, cohesivity and particle size distributions vary among HA fillers manufactured with different techniques. The creation of new labels identifying products based on their unique combination of physiochemical and physical characteristics may help guide appropriate selection of HA fillers to optimize patient outcomes.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Hyaluronic acid (HA) fillers are used to treat an array of aesthetic indications. Proper filler selection is paramount for successful patient outcomes. However, many important physiochemical and physical properties that impact HA gel behavior remain undefined.
Purpose UNASSIGNED
To evaluate the hydrophilicity, cohesivity and particle size of eight commercial HA fillers manufactured by either Non-Animal Stabilized Hyaluronic Acid (NASHA) or Optimal Balance Technology (OBT) techniques.
Methods and Materials UNASSIGNED
Three individual in vitro experiments were performed to assess HA swelling capacity, cohesion, and particle size. Image analyses, blinded evaluation using the Gavard-Sundaram Cohesivity Scale, and laser diffraction technology were utilized, respectively.
Results UNASSIGNED
Compared to fillers manufactured with NASHA technology, OBT products demonstrated greater swelling capacity, cohesion, and wider particle size distributions. Strong positive correlations between swelling factor, degree of cohesivity, and increasing widths of the particle size distributions were observed.
Conclusions UNASSIGNED
The hydrophilicity, cohesivity and particle size distributions vary among HA fillers manufactured with different techniques. The creation of new labels identifying products based on their unique combination of physiochemical and physical characteristics may help guide appropriate selection of HA fillers to optimize patient outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38230304
doi: 10.2147/CCID.S446429
pii: 446429
pmc: PMC10790663
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

89-101

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Enright et al.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Dr. Kaitlyn Enright is or has been a consultant and/or speaker for Galderma (Lausanne, Switzerland) and Merz (Frankfurt, Germany). Dr. Andreas Nikolis is or has been a consultant and/or speaker for Galderma (Lausanne, Switzerland), Merz (Frankfurt, Germany), Allergan (Dublin, Ireland) and Prollenium (Montreal, QC). Dr Steven Weiner reports grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Galderma, outside the submitted work. Dr Kalpna Durairaj reports event speaker honorarium and clinical study partnership from Merz Pharma, event speaker honorarium and trainer honorarium from Galderma Pharma, and event speaker honorarium from Prollenium (Revanesse), during the conduct of the study. The authors report no other conflicts of interest related to this work.

Auteurs

Kaitlyn M Enright (KM)

Clinical Research Unit, Erevna Innovations Inc, Westmount, Quebec, Canada.

Steven F Weiner (SF)

The Aesthetic Clinique, New York, NY, USA.

Kalpna K Durairaj (KK)

Beauty by Dr. Kay, Pasadena, CA, USA.

Mirko S Gilardino (MS)

Division of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Andreas Nikolis (A)

Clinical Research Unit, Erevna Innovations Inc, Westmount, Quebec, Canada; Department of Plastic Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Classifications MeSH