Initial Experience With Robotic-Assisted Otologic and Lateral Skull Base Surgery.
cochlear implants
ergonomics
mastoid surgery
robotics
skull base surgery
Journal
Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
ISSN: 1097-6817
Titre abrégé: Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8508176
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2024
17 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
28
08
2023
accepted:
23
09
2023
medline:
17
1
2024
pubmed:
17
1
2024
entrez:
17
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Robotic-assisted surgery has gained popularity for otolaryngology procedures. It provides high-definition images and surgical precision to perform diverse procedures. It is an alternative to the operating microscope, endoscope, or exoscope when reaching hidden anatomical structures in the ear. In this proof-of-concept study, we aim to demonstrate the possibility of using a robotic-assisted device to perform ear surgery in conjunction with the microscope or the endoscope. In total, there were 9 ear and lateral skull base procedures performed with the use of robotic-assisted surgery. All surgeons underwent surveys to assess the performance and workload of the device compared to the microscope or endoscope. There were no postoperative complications. Robotic-assisted surgery was optimal for providing high image quality, ergonomics, and maintaining surgical performance. The size of the device and mental demand were higher compared to the microscope or endoscope. Robotic-assisted surgery can be an adjuvant to perform otologic and neurotologic surgery.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024 American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
Références
Han J, Davids J, Ashrafian H, Darzi A, Elson DS, Sodergren M. A systematic review of robotic surgery: from supervised paradigms to fully autonomous robotic approaches. Int J Med Robot. 2022;18(2):e2358. doi:10.1002/rcs.2358
Nakayama M, Holsinger FC, Chevalier D, Orosco RK. The dawn of robotic surgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2019;49(5):404-411. doi:10.1093/jjco/hyz020
More YI, Tsue TT, Girod DA, et al. Functional swallowing outcomes following transoral robotic surgery vs primary chemoradiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage oropharynx and supraglottis cancers. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;139(1):43. doi:10.1001/jamaoto.2013.1074
Iseli TA, Kulbersh BD, Iseli CE, Carroll WR, Rosenthal EL, Magnuson JS. Functional outcomes after transoral robotic surgery for head and neck cancer. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;141(2):166-171. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2009.05.014
Tamaki A, Rocco JW, Ozer E. The future of robotic surgery in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery. Oral Oncol. 2020;101:104510. doi:10.1016/j.oraloncology.2019.104510
Aggarwal R, Saeed SR, Green KJM. Myringoplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(6):429-432. doi:10.1017/S0022215106000697
Tarabichi M. Endoscopic middle ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1999;108(1):39-46. doi:10.1177/000348949910800106
Zakir I, Ahmad AN, Pasha HA, Aqil S, Akhtar S. Comparison of endoscopic versus microscopic tympanoplasty. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022;34(122):139-143. doi:10.22038/IJORL.2022.61234.3104
Gulsen S, Baltacı A. Comparison of endoscopic transcanal and microscopic approach in type 1 tympanoplasty. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021;87(2):157-163. doi:10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.07.005
Emre IE, Cingi C, Bayar Muluk N, Nogueira JF. Endoscopic ear surgery. J Otol. 2020;15(1):27-32. doi:10.1016/j.joto.2019.11.004
Chern A, Sharma RK, Maurrasse SE, Drusin MA, Ciarleglio AJ, Golub JS. Educational value of endoscopic versus microscopic ear surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2022;131(2):147-153. doi:10.1177/00034894211012600
Piloni M, Bailo M, Gagliardi F, Mortini P. Resection of intracranial tumors with a robotic-assisted digital microscope: a preliminary experience with robotic scope. World Neurosurg. 2021;152:e205-e211. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2021.05.075
Boehm F, Schuler PJ, Riepl R, Schild L, Hoffmann TK, Greve J. Performance of microvascular anastomosis with a new robotic visualization system: proof of concept. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(3):705-713. doi:10.1007/s11701-021-01294-5
Hart SG, Staveland LE. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv Psychol. 1988;52:139-183. doi:10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9
Panara K, Shahal D, Mittal R, Eshraghi AA. Robotics for cochlear implantation surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2021;42:e825-e835. doi:10.1097/MAO.0000000000003165
Byrd JK, Paquin R. Cost considerations for robotic surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2020;53(6):1131-1138. doi:10.1016/j.otc.2020.07.019
Kiong KL, Iyer NG, Skanthakumar T, et al. Transaxillary thyroidectomies: a comparative learning experience of robotic vs endoscopic thyroidectomies. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015;152(5):820-826. doi:10.1177/0194599815573003