Recent advances in clinical electroencephalography.
Journal
Current opinion in neurology
ISSN: 1473-6551
Titre abrégé: Curr Opin Neurol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9319162
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
18 Jan 2024
18 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline:
17
1
2024
pubmed:
17
1
2024
entrez:
17
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Clinical electroencephalography (EEG) is a conservative medical field. This explains likely the significant gap between clinical practice and new research developments. This narrative review discusses possible causes of this discrepancy and how to circumvent them. More specifically, we summarize recent advances in three applications of clinical EEG: source imaging (ESI), high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and EEG in critically ill patients. Recently published studies on ESI provide further evidence for the accuracy and clinical utility of this method in the multimodal presurgical evaluation of patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy, and opened new possibilities for further improvement of the accuracy. HFOs have received much attention as a novel biomarker in epilepsy. However, recent studies questioned their clinical utility at the level of individual patients. We discuss the impediments, show up possible solutions and highlight the perspectives of future research in this field. EEG in the ICU has been one of the major driving forces in the development of clinical EEG. We review the achievements and the limitations in this field. This review will promote clinical implementation of recent advances in EEG, in the fields of ESI, HFOs and EEG in the intensive care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38230652
doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001246
pii: 00019052-990000000-00134
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Benbadis SR, Beniczky S, Bertram E, et al. The role of EEG in patients with suspected epilepsy. Epileptic Disord 2020; 22:143–155.
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. BMJ 2015; 351:h5527.
Ewen JB, Beniczky S. Validating biomarkers and diagnostic tests in clinical neurophysiology: developing strong experimental designs and recognizing confounds. In: Schomer DL, Lopes da Silva HF, editors. Niedermeyer's electroencephalography: basic principles, clinical applications, and related fields (7 ed.): Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. pp. 206--229.
Seeck M, Koessler L, Bast T, et al. The standardized EEG electrode array of the IFCN. Clin Neurophysiol 2017; 128:2070–2077.
Sharma P, Seeck M, Beniczky S. Accuracy of interictal and ictal electric and magnetic source imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Neurol 2019; 10:1250.
Mouthaan BE, Rados M, Boon P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of interictal source imaging in presurgical epilepsy evaluation: a systematic review from the E-PILEPSY consortium. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:845–855.
Tatum WO, Rubboli G, Kaplan PW, et al. Clinical utility of EEG in diagnosing and monitoring epilepsy in adults. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129:1056–1082.
Mouthaan BE, Rados M, Barsi P, et al. Current use of imaging and electromagnetic source localization procedures in epilepsy surgery centers across Europe. Epilepsia 2016; 57:770–776.
Peltola ME, Leitinger M, Halford JJ, et al. Routine and sleep EEG: minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy. Epilepsia 2023; 64:602–618.
Tatum WO, Mani J, Jin K, et al. Minimum standards for inpatient long-term video-electroencephalographic monitoring: a clinical practice guideline of the International League Against Epilepsy and International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Epilepsia 2022; 63:290–315.
Pascarella A, Mikulan E, Sciacchitano F, et al. An in-vivo validation of ESI methods with focal sources. Neuroimage 2023; 277:120219.
Unnwongse K, Rampp S, Wehner T, et al. Validating EEG source imaging using intracranial electrical stimulation. Brain Commun 2023; 5:fcad023.
Abdallah C, Hedrich T, Koupparis A, et al. Clinical yield of electromagnetic source imaging and hemodynamic responses in epilepsy: validation with intracerebral data. Neurology 2022; 98:e2499–e2511.
Duez L, Tankisi H, Hansen PO, et al. Electromagnetic source imaging in presurgical workup of patients with epilepsy: a prospective study. Neurology 2019; 92:e576–e586.
Mattioli P, Cleeren E, Hadady L, et al. Electric source imaging in presurgical evaluation of epilepsy: an inter-analyser agreement study. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:2303.
Spinelli L, Baroumand AG, Vulliemoz S, et al. Semiautomatic interictal electric source localization based on long-term electroencephalographic monitoring: a prospective study. Epilepsia 2023; 64:951–961.
Withers CP, Diamond JM, Yang B, et al. Identifying sources of human interictal discharges with travelling wave and white matter propagation. Brain 2023; 146:5168–5181.
Scherg M, Schulz R, Berg P, et al. Relative source power: a novel method for localizing epileptiform EEG discharges. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 133:9–19.
Sun R, Sohrabpour A, Worrell GA, et al. Deep neural networks constrained by neural mass models improve electrophysiological source imaging of spatiotemporal brain dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2022; 119:e2201128119.
Frauscher B, Bartolomei F, Kobayashi K, et al. High-frequency oscillations: the state of clinical research. Epilepsia 2017; 58:1316–1329.
Wang Y, Xu J, Liu T, et al. Diagnostic value of high-frequency oscillations for the epileptogenic zone: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seizure 2022; 99:82–90.
Zweiphenning W, van’t Klooster MA, van Klink NEC, et al. Intraoperative electrocoricography using high-frequency oscillations or spikes to tailor epilepsy surgery in the Netherlands (the HFO trial): a randomized, single-blind, adaptive noninferiority trial. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:982–993.
Thomas J, Kahane P, Abdallah C, et al. A subpopulation of spikes predicts. Ann Neurol 2023; 93:522–535.
Travnicek V, Klimes P, Cimbalnik J, et al. Relative entropy is an easy-to-use invasive electroencephalographic biomarker of the epileptogenic zone. Epilepsia 2023; 64:962–972.
Nunez MD, Charupanit K, Sen-Gupta I, et al. Beyond rates: time-varying dynamics of high frequency oscillations as a biomarker of the seizure onset zone. J Neural Eng 2022; 19:10.1088.
Petito GT, Housekeeper J, Buroker J. Diurnal rhythms of spontaneous intracranial high-frequency oscillations. Seizure 2022; 102:105–112.
Klimes P, Peter-Derex L, Hall J, et al. Spatio-temporal spike dynamics predict surgical outcome in adult focal epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2022; 134:88–99.
Zhao B, McGonigal A, Hu W, et al. Interictal HFO and FDG-PET correlation predicts surgical outcome following SEEG. Epilepsia 2023; 64:667–677.
Zweiphenning WJEM, von Ellenrieder N, Dubeau F, et al. Correcting for physiological ripples improves epileptic focus identification and outcome prediction. Epilepsia 2022; 63:483–496.
Frauscher B, von Ellenrieder N, Zelmann R, et al. High-frequency oscillations in the normal human brain. Ann Neurol 2018; 84:374–385.
Barth KJ, Sun J, Chiang CH, et al. Flexible, high-resolution cotical arrays with large coverage capture microscale high-frequency oscillations in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsia 2023; 64:1910–1924.
Roehri N, Pizzo F, Bartolomei F, et al. What are the assets and weaknesses of HFO detectors? A benchmark framework based on realistic stimulations. PLoS One 2017; 12:e0174702.
Besheli BF, Sha Z, Gavvala JR, et al. a sparse representation strategy to eliminate pseudo-HFO events from intracranial EEG for seizure onset zone localization. Neural Eng 2022; 19: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac8766.
doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/ac8766
Burelo K, Sharifshazileh M, Indiveri G, Sarnthein J. Automatic detection of high-frequency oscillations with neuromorphic spiking neural networks. Front Neurosci 2022; 16:861480.
Zhang Y, Chung H, Ngo JP, et al. Characterizing physiological high-frequency oscillations using deep learning. J Neural Eng 2022; 19: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca4fa.
doi: 10.1088/1741-2552/aca4fa
Monsoor T, Zhang Y, Daida A, et al. Optimizing detection and deep learning-based classification of pathological high-frequency oscillations in epilepsy. Clin Neurophysiol 2023; 154:129–140.
Dimakopoulos V, Gotman J, Stacey W, et al. Protocol for multicentre comparison of interictal high-frequency oscillations as a predictor of seizure freedom. Brain Commun 2022; 4:fcac151.
Sutter R. Are we prepared to detect subtle and nonconvulsive status epilepticus in critically ill patients? J Clin Neurophysiol 2016; 33:25–31.
Florea B, Beniczky SA, Demeny H, Beniczky S. Semiology of subtle motor phenomena in critically ill patients. Seizure 2017; 48:33–35.
Nolan JP, Sandroni C, Bottiger BW, et al. European Resuscitation Council and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine guidelines 2021: postresuscitation care. Intensive Care Med 2021; 47:369–421.
Rosenthal ES, Biswal S, Zafaer SF, et al. Continuous electroencephalography predicts delayed cerebral ischemia after subarachnoid hemorrhage: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy. Ann Neurol 2018; 83:958–969.
Rossetti AO, Alvarez V. Update on the management of status epilepticus. Curr Opin Neurol 2021; 34:172–181.
Vulliemoz S, Perrig S, Pellise D, et al. Imaging compatible electrodes for continuous electroencephalogram monitoring in the intensive care unit. J Clin Neurophysiol 2009; 26:236–243.
Admiraal MM, Horn J, Hofmeijer J, et al. EEG reactivity testing for prediction of good outcome in patients after cardiac arrest. Neurology 2020; 95:e653–e661.
Vanat A, Lee JW, Elkhider H, et al. Multimodal prediction of favorable outcome after cardiac arrest: a cohort study. Crit Care Med 2023; 51:706–716.
Hirsch LJ, Fong MWK, Leitinger M, et al. American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Standardized Critical Care EEG Terminology: 2021 Version. J Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 38:1–29.
Rubin DB, Angelini B, Shoukat M, et al. Electrographic predictors of successful weaning from anaesthetics in refractory status epilepticus. Brain 2020; 143:1143–1157.
Duez CHV, Ebbesen MQ, Benedek K, et al. Large inter-rater variability on EEG-reactivity is improved by a novel quantitative method. Clin Neurophysiol 2018; 129:724–730.
Amorim E, van der Stoel M, Nagaraj SB, et al. Quantitative EEG reactivity and machine learning for prognostication in hypoxic-ischemic brain injury. Clin Neurophysiol 2019; 130:1908–1916.
Aellen FM, Alnes SL, Lossli S, et al. Auditory stimulation and deep learning predict awakening from coma after cardiac arrest. Brain 2023; 146:778–788.
Koren J, Hafner S, Feigl M, et al. Systematic analysis and comparison of commercial seizure-detection software. Epilepsia 2021; 62:426–438.
Moura LM, Shafi MM, Ng M, et al. Spectrogram screening of adult EEGs is sensitive and efficient. Neurology 2014; 83:56–64.
Scheuer ML, Wilson SB, Antony A, et al. Seizure detection: interreader agreement and detection algorithm assessments using a large dataset. J Clin Neurophysiol 2021; 38:439–447.
Hill CE, Blank LJ, Thibaut D, et al. Continuous EEG is associated with favorable hospitalization outcomes for critically ill patients. Neurology 2019; 92:e9–e18.
Rossetti AO, Schindler K, Sutter R, et al. Continuous vs routine electroencephalogram in critically ill adults with altered consciousness and no recent seizure: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77:1225–1232.
Beuchat I, Rossetti AO, Novy J, et al. Continuous versus routine standardized electroencephalogram for outcome prediction in critically ill adults: analysis from a randomized trial. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:329–334.
Vassallo P, Novy J, Zubler F, et al. EEG spindles integrity in critical care adults. Analysis of a randomized trial. Acta Neurol Scand 2021; 144:655–662.
Chiu WT, Campozano V, Schiefecker A, et al. Management of refractory status epilepticus: an International Cohort Study (MORSE CODe) analysis of patients managed in the ICU. Neurology 2022; 99:e1191–e1201.
Urbano V, Alvarez V, Schindler K, et al. Continuous versus routine EEG in patients after cardiac arrest: analysis of a randomized controlled trial (CERTA). Resuscitation 2022; 176:68–73.
Struck AF, Tabaeizadeh M, Schmitt SE, et al. Assessment of the Validity of the 2HELPS2B Score for Inpatient Seizure Risk Prediction. JAMA Neurol 2020; 77:500–507.
Cisse FA, Osman GM, Legros B, et al. Validation of an algorithm of time-dependent electro-clinical risk stratification for electrographic seizures (TERSE) in critically ill patients. Clin Neurophysiol 2020; 131:1956–1961.