No difference in prevalence of postoperative iliopsoas tendinitis in patients undergoing arthroscopic hip surgery when using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture for capsular closure.
Absorbable suture
Hip arthroscopy
IPT
Non-absorbable suture
Journal
European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie
ISSN: 1432-1068
Titre abrégé: Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol
Pays: France
ID NLM: 9518037
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2024
17 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
15
10
2023
accepted:
15
12
2023
medline:
17
1
2024
pubmed:
17
1
2024
entrez:
17
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
The volume of arthroscopic hip surgery has increased dramatically in recent years with iliopsoas tendinitis (IPT) being one of the most common complications of this procedure. The purpose of this study is to investigate the prevalence of post-operative IPT in patients who undergo arthroscopic hip surgery with capsular closure using absorbable versus non-absorbable suture. This is a single center, single surgeon, retrospective analysis performed between August 2007 and May 2023 comparing two cohorts who underwent hip arthroscopy. Patients were divided into those who underwent surgery with capsular closure using absorbable (Vicryl Between August 2007 and May 2023 a total of 1513 hip arthroscopy surgeries were performed. Within this cohort, 1421 hips underwent hip arthroscopy with non-absorbable suture and 64 hips underwent surgery with absorbable suture. There was no significant difference between the proportion of IPT in the non-absorbable cohort (2.3%) versus the absorbable cohort (1.6%) (P = 0.669). Capsular closure with Absorbable sutures was non-inferior to capsular closure with non-absorbable sutures with respect to the proportion of post-operative IPT following hip arthroscopy for FAI. Additionally, the proportion of post-operative IPT was found to be significantly higher in patients undergoing revision versus primary hip arthroscopy, regardless of capsular closure suture type. IV.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38231259
doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03818-1
pii: 10.1007/s00590-023-03818-1
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
Références
Zusmanovich M, Haselman W, Serrano B, Banffy M (2022) The incidence of hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and labral pathology increased by 85% between 2011 and 2018 in the United States. Arthroscopy 38:82–87
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.04.049
pubmed: 33964383
Malik AT, Jain N, Scharschmidt TJ, Glassman AH, Khan SN (2022) Primary hip arthroscopy and conversion to total hip arthroplasty: trends and survival analysis in the medicare population. Hip Int 32:239–245
doi: 10.1177/1120700020951171
pubmed: 32866054
Cvetanovich GL, Chalmers PN, Levy DM et al (2016) Hip arthroscopy surgical volume trends and 30-day postoperative complications. Arthroscopy 32:1286–1292
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.042
pubmed: 27067059
MaraditKremers H, Schilz SR, Van Houten HK et al (2017) Trends in utilization and outcomes of hip arthroscopy in the United States between 2005 and 2013. J Arthroplast 32:750–755
doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.09.004
Nakano N, Lisenda L, Jones TL, Loveday DT, Khanduja V (2017) Complications following arthroscopic surgery of the hip: a systematic review of 36,761 cases. Bone Jt J 99-B:1577–1583
doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.99B12.BJJ-2017-0043.R2
Papavasiliou AV, Bardakos NV (2012) Complications of arthroscopic surgery of the hip. Bone Jt Res 1:131–144
doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.17.2000108
Johnston CA, Wiley JP, Lindsay DM, Wiseman DA (1998) Iliopsoas bursitis and tendinitis a review. Sports Med 25:271–283
doi: 10.2165/00007256-199825040-00005
pubmed: 9587184
Tibor LM, Sekiya JK (2008) Differential diagnosis of pain around the hip joint. Arthroscopy 24:1407–1421
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2008.06.019
pubmed: 19038713
Kelly BT, Buly RL (2005) Hip arthroscopy update. HSS J 1:40–48
doi: 10.1007/s11420-005-0105-3
pubmed: 18751808
pmcid: 2504137
Philippon MJ, Decker MJ, Giphart JE, Torry MR, Wahoff MS, LaPrade RF (2011) Rehabilitation exercise progression for the gluteus medius muscle with consideration for iliopsoas tendinitis: an in vivo electromyography study. Am J Sports Med 39:1777–1785
doi: 10.1177/0363546511406848
pubmed: 21566069
Campbell A, Thompson K, Pham H et al (2021) The incidence and pattern of iliopsoas tendinitis following hip arthroscopy. Hip Int 31:542–547
doi: 10.1177/1120700020908845
pubmed: 32093507
Matalia J, Panmand P, Ghalla P (2018) Comparative analysis of non-absorbable 10–0 nylon sutures with absorbable 10–0 vicryl sutures in pediatric cataract surgery. Indian J Ophthalmol 66:661–664
doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_654_17
pubmed: 29676310
pmcid: 5939158
Alawode AO, Adeyemi MO, James O, Ogunlewe MO, Butali A, Adeyemo WL (2018) A comparative study of immediate wound healing complications following cleft lip repair using either absorbable or non-absorbable skin sutures. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:159–166
doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2018.44.4.159
pubmed: 30181982
pmcid: 6117469
Moy RL, Waldman B, Hein DW (1992) A review of sutures and suturing techniques. J Dermatol Surg Oncol 18:785–795
doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb03036.x
pubmed: 1512311
Debus ES, Geiger D, Sailer M, Ederer J, Thiede A (1997) Physical, biological and handling characteristics of surgical suture material: a comparison of four different multifilament absorbable sutures. Eur Surg Res 29:52–61
doi: 10.1159/000129507
pubmed: 9013106
Tajirian AL, Goldberg DJ (2010) A review of sutures and other skin closure materials. J Cosmet Laser Ther 12:296–302
doi: 10.3109/14764172.2010.538413
pubmed: 21142740
Dijkstra HP, Mc Auliffe S, Ardern CL et al (2022) Oxford consensus on primary cam morphology and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: part 1-definitions, terminology, taxonomy and imaging outcomes. Br J Sports Med 57:325–341
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106085
pubmed: 36588401
Althunian TA, de Boer A, Groenwold RHH, Klungel OH (2017) Defining the noninferiority margin and analysing noninferiority: an overview. Br J Clin Pharmacol 83:1636–1642
doi: 10.1111/bcp.13280
pubmed: 28252213
pmcid: 5510081
Adib F, Johnson AJ, Hennrikus WL, Nasreddine A, Kocher M, Yen YM (2018) Iliopsoas tendonitis after hip arthroscopy: prevalence, risk factors and treatment algorithm. J Hip Preserv Surg 5:362–369
doi: 10.1093/jhps/hny049
pubmed: 30647926
pmcid: 6328754
Cvetanovich GL, Harris JD, Erickson BJ, Bach BR Jr, Bush-Joseph CA, Nho SJ (2015) Revision hip arthroscopy: a systematic review of diagnoses, operative findings, and outcomes. Arthroscopy 31:1382–1390
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.12.027
pubmed: 25703289
Liu S, Wang Y, Kotian RN et al (2018) Comparison of nonabsorbable and absorbable suture in total knee arthroplasty. Med Sci Monit 24:7563–7569
doi: 10.12659/MSM.910785
pubmed: 30350827
pmcid: 6354634
Bar-Sela SM, Spierer O, Spierer A (2007) Suture-related complications after congenital cataract surgery: vicryl versus mersilene sutures. J Cataract Refract Surg 33:301–304
doi: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2006.10.039
pubmed: 17276274
Li ZY, Hu GF, Jin ZG et al (2021) Capsular healing in interportal and periportal capsulotomy methods of hip arthroscopy. Orthop Surg 13:1863–1869
doi: 10.1111/os.13132
pubmed: 34351066
pmcid: 8523751
Hassinger SM, Wongworawat MD, Hechanova JW (2006) Biomechanical characteristics of 10 arthroscopic knots. Arthroscopy 22:827–832
doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2006.04.094
pubmed: 16904578
Meyer DC, Bachmann E, Ladermann A, Lajtai G, Jentzsch T (2018) The best knot and suture configurations for high-strength suture material. An in vitro biomechanical study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:1277–1282
doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2018.08.010
pubmed: 30327262
Haynes DF, Kreithen JC (2014) Vicryl mesh in expander/implant breast reconstruction: long-term follow-up in 38 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 134:892–899
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000610
pubmed: 25347625