Ultra-late response (> 24 weeks) to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.
Anti-CGRP mAbs
Late response
Migraine
Real-life
Responder
Treatment
Ultra-late response
Journal
Journal of neurology
ISSN: 1432-1459
Titre abrégé: J Neurol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 0423161
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
17 Jan 2024
17 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
03
10
2023
accepted:
06
11
2023
revised:
04
11
2023
medline:
17
1
2024
pubmed:
17
1
2024
entrez:
17
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Nearly 60% of migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway experience a ≥ 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) at 12 weeks compared to baseline (responders). However, approximately half of the patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 12 weeks do respond ≤ 24 weeks (late responders). We assessed frequency and characteristics of patients responding to anti-CGRP mAbs only > 24 weeks (ultra-late responders). In this multicenter (n = 16), prospective, observational, real-life study, we enrolled all consecutive adults affected by high-frequency episodic migraine (HFEM: ≥ 8 days/month) or chronic migraine (CM), with ≥ 3 prior therapeutic failures, treated with any anti-CGRP mAbs for ≥ 48 weeks. We defined responders patients with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 12 weeks, late responders those with a ≥ 50% response rate ≤ 24 weeks, and ultra-late responders those achieving a ≥ 50% response only > 24 weeks. A total of 572 migraine patients completed ≥ 48 weeks of anti-CGRP mAbs treatment. Responders accounted for 60.5% (346/572), late responders for 15% (86/572), and ultra-late responders for 15.7% (90/572). Among ultra-late responders, 7.3% (42/572) maintained the ≥ 50% response rate across all subsequent time intervals (weeks 28, 32, 36, 40, 44, and 48) and were considered persistent ultra-late responders, while 8.4% (48/572) missed the ≥ 50% response rate at ≥ 1 subsequent time interval and were classified as fluctuating ultra-late responders. Fifty patients (8.7%) did not respond at any time interval ≤ 48 weeks. Ultra-late responders differed from responders for higher BMI (p = 0.033), longer duration of medication overuse (p < 0.001), lower NRS (p = 0.017) and HIT-6 scores (p = 0.002), higher frequency of dopaminergic symptoms (p = 0.002), less common unilateral pain-either alone (p = 0.010) or in combination with UAS (p = 0.023), allodynia (p = 0.043), or UAS and allodynia (p = 0.012)-a higher number of comorbidities (p = 0.012), psychiatric comorbidities (p = 0.010) and a higher proportion of patients with ≥ 1 comorbidity (p = 0.020). Two-thirds of patients not responding to anti-CGRP mAbs ≤ 24 weeks do respond later, while non-responders ≤ 48 weeks are quite rare (8.7%). These findings suggest to rethink the duration of migraine prophylaxis and the definition of resistant and refractory migraine, currently based on the response after 2-3 months of treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38231271
doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-12103-4
pii: 10.1007/s00415-023-12103-4
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
© 2024. The Author(s).
Références
Andreou AP, Edvinsson L (2019) Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J Headache Pain 20(1):117
doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1066-0
pubmed: 31870279
pmcid: 6929435
Eigenbrodt AK et al (2021) Diagnosis and management of migraine in ten steps. Nat Rev Neurol 17(8):501–514
doi: 10.1038/s41582-021-00509-5
pubmed: 34145431
pmcid: 8321897
Katsarava Z, Mania M, Lampl C, Herberhold J, Steiner TJ (2018) Poor medical care for people with migraine in Europe – evidence from the Eurolight study. J Headache Pain 19(1):10
doi: 10.1186/s10194-018-0839-1
pubmed: 29392600
pmcid: 5794675
Lipton RB, Nicholson RA, Reed ML, Araujo AB, Jaffe DH, Faries DE, Buse DC, Shapiro RE, Ashina S, Cambron-Mellott MJ, Rowland JC, Pearlman EM (2022) Diagnosis, consultation, treatment, and impact of migraine in the US: Results of the OVERCOME (US) study. Headache 62(2):122–140
doi: 10.1111/head.14259
pubmed: 35076091
pmcid: 9305407
Hepp Z, Bloudek LM, Varon SF (2014) Systematic review of migraine prophylaxis adherence and persistence. J Manag Care Pharm 20(1):22–33
pubmed: 24372457
Sacco S, Amin FM, Ashina M, Bendtsen L, Deligianni CI, Gil-Gouveia R, Katsarava Z, MaassenVanDenBrink A, Martelletti P, Mitsikostas DD, Ornello R, Reuter U, Sanchez-Del-Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Terwindt G, Uluduz D, Versijpt J, Lampl C (2022) European headache federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention - 2022 update. J Headache Pain 23(1):67. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x
doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01431-x
pubmed: 35690723
pmcid: 9188162
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Torelli P, Proietti S, Cevoli S, Bonassi S (2023) Italian migraine registry study group late response to anti-cgrp monoclonal antibodies in migraine: a multicenter, prospective, observational study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000207292
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000207292
pubmed: 37072224
Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana. Serie Generale n; 2020. Accessed January 17, 2023. gazzettaufficiale.it/gazzetta/serie_generale/caricaDettaglio? dataPubblicazioneGazzetta=2020–07–21&numeroGazzetta=182.
Barbanti P, Egeo G, Aurilia C et al (2022) Predictors of response to anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: a 24-week, multicenter, prospective study on 864 migraine patients. J Headache Pain 23:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-022-01498-6
doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01498-6
pubmed: 36316648
pmcid: 9623966
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Dall’Armi V, Egeo G, Fofi L, Bonassi S (2016) The phenotype of migraine with unilateral cranial autonomic symptoms documents increased peripheral and central trigeminal sensitization. a case series of 757 patients. Cephalalgia 36(14):1334–1340
doi: 10.1177/0333102416630579
pubmed: 26858260
Barbanti P, Aurilia C, Egeo G, Fofi L, Guadagni F, Ferroni P (2020) Dopaminergic symptoms in migraine: a cross-sectional study on 1148 consecutive headache center-based patients. Cephalalgia 40(11):1168–1176
doi: 10.1177/0333102420929023
pubmed: 32484361
Silberstein S, Tfelt-Hansen P, Dodick DW, Limmroth V, Lipton RB, Pascual J, Wang SJ (2008) Task force of the international headache society clinical trials subcommittee guidelines for controlled trials of prophylactic treatment of chronic migraine in adults. Cephalalgia 28(5):484–495
doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2008.01555.x
pubmed: 18294250
Hong JB, Lange KS, Overeem LH, Triller P, Raffaelli B, Reuter U (2023) A scoping review and meta-analysis of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies: predicting response. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 16(7):934. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16070934
doi: 10.3390/ph16070934
pubmed: 37513846
Sauro KM, Rose MS, Becker WJ, Christie SN, Giammarco R, Mackie GF, Eloff AG, Gawel MJ (2010) HIT-6 and MIDAS as measures of headache disability in a headache referral population. Headache 50(3):383–395
doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01544.x
pubmed: 19817883
Recober A, Goadsby PJ (2010) Calcitonin gene-related peptide: a molecular link between obesity and migraine? Drug News Perspect 23(2):112–117
doi: 10.1358/dnp.2010.23.2.1475909
pubmed: 20369076
pmcid: 2947336
Mathe AA, Agren H, Lindstrom L, Theodorsson E (1994) Increased concentration of calcitonin gene-related peptide in cerebrospinal fluid of depressed patients a possible trait marker of major depressive disorder. Neurosci Lett 182(2):138–142
doi: 10.1016/0304-3940(94)90782-X
pubmed: 7715797
D’Antona L, Matharu M (2019) Identifying and managing refractory migraine: barriers and opportunities? J Headache Pain 20(1):89. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-019-1040-x
doi: 10.1186/s10194-019-1040-x
pubmed: 31443629
pmcid: 6734232
Ray JC, Hutton EJ, Matharu M (2021) OnabotulinumtoxinA in migraine: a review of the literature and factors associated with efficacy. J Clin Med 10(13):2898. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10132898
doi: 10.3390/jcm10132898
pubmed: 34209849
pmcid: 8269087
Messina R, Huessler EM, Puledda F, Haghdoost F, Lebedeva ER, Diener HC (2023) Safety and tolerability of monoclonal antibodies targeting the CGRP pathway and gepants in migraine prevention: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Cephalalgia 43(3):3331024231152169. https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024231152169
doi: 10.1177/03331024231152169
pubmed: 36786548
Rattanawong W, Rapoport A, Srikiatkhachorn A (2022) Neurobiology of migraine progression. Neurobiol Pain 9(12):100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100094
doi: 10.1016/j.ynpai.2022.100094
D’Andrea G, D’Amico D, Bussone G, Bolner A, Aguggia M, Saracco MG, Galloni E, De Riva V, Colavito D, Leon A, Rosteghin V, Perini F (2013) The role of tyrosine metabolism in the pathogenesis of chronic migraine. Cephalalgia 33(11):932–937
doi: 10.1177/0333102413480755
pubmed: 23493762
Burstein R, Noseda R, Borsook D (2015) Migraine: multiple processes, complex pathophysiology. J Neurosci 35(17):6619–6629
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0373-15.2015
pubmed: 25926442
pmcid: 4412887
Sacco S, Braschinsky M, Ducros A, Lampl C, Little P, van den Brink AM, Pozo-Rosich P, Reuter U, de la Torre ER, Sanchez Del Rio M, Sinclair AJ, Katsarava Z, Martelletti P (2020) European headache federation consensus on the definition of resistant and refractory migraine: developed with the endorsement of the European Migraine & Headache Alliance (EMHA). J Headache Pain 21(1):76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s10194-020-01130-5
doi: 10.1186/s10194-020-01130-5
pubmed: 32546227
pmcid: 7296705
Manack A, Buse DC, Serrano D, Turkel CC, Lipton RB (2011) Rates, predictors, and consequences of remission from chronic migraine to episodic migraine. Neurology 76(8):711–718
doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31820d8af2
pubmed: 21270413