Barriers to and enablers of quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review.


Journal

PLOS global public health
ISSN: 2767-3375
Titre abrégé: PLOS Glob Public Health
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9918283779606676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 31 07 2023
accepted: 06 12 2023
medline: 18 1 2024
pubmed: 18 1 2024
entrez: 18 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The quality of health care remains generally poor across primary health care settings, especially in low- and middle-income countries where tertiary care tends to take up much of the limited resources despite primary health care being the first (and often the only) point of contact with the health system for nearly 80 per cent of people in these countries. Evidence is needed on barriers and enablers of quality improvement initiatives. This systematic review sought to answer the question: What are the enablers of and barriers to quality improvement in primary health care in low- and middle-income countries? It adopted an integrative review approach with narrative evidence synthesis, which combined qualitative and mixed methods research studies systematically. Using a customized geographic search filter for LMICs developed by the Cochrane Collaboration, Scopus, Academic Search Ultimate, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PSYCHINFO, EMBASE, ProQuest Dissertations and Overton.io (a new database for LMIC literature) were searched in January and February 2023, as were selected websites and journals. 7,077 reports were retrieved. After removing duplicates, reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts and full texts, performed quality appraisal and data extraction, followed by analysis and synthesis. 50 reports from 47 studies were included, covering 52 LMIC settings. Six themes related to barriers and enablers of quality improvement were identified and organized using the model for understanding success in quality (MUSIQ) and the consolidated framework for implementation research (CFIR). These were: microsystem of quality improvement, intervention attributes, implementing organization and team, health systems support and capacity, external environment and structural factors, and execution. Decision makers, practitioners, funders, implementers, and other stakeholders can use the evidence from this systematic review to minimize barriers and amplify enablers to better the chances that quality improvement initiatives will be successful in resource-limited settings. PROSPERO registration: CRD42023395166.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38236832
doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0002756
pii: PGPH-D-23-01492
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e0002756

Informations de copyright

Copyright: © 2024 Odhus et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Auteurs

Camlus Otieno Odhus (CO)

Division of Health Research, Faculty of Health and Medicine, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom.

Ruth Razanajafy Kapanga (RR)

County Department of Health, Kakamega County Government, Kakamega, Kenya.

Elizabeth Oele (E)

County Department of Health, County Government of Kisumu, Kisumu, Kenya.

Classifications MeSH