The diversification of methods for studying cell-cell interactions and communication.

Sgro, A. E. et al. From intracellular signaling to population oscillations: bridging size- and time-scales in collective behavior. Mol. Syst. Biol. 11, 779 (2015).

pubmed: 25617347 pmcid: 4332153 doi: 10.15252/msb.20145352

Dang, Y., Grundel, D. A. J. & Youk, H. Cellular dialogues: cell–cell communication through diffusible molecules yields dynamic spatial patterns. Cell Syst. 10, 82–98.e7 (2020).

pubmed: 31954659 pmcid: 6975168 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.12.001

Stent, G. S. Cellular communication. Sci. Am. 227, 43–51 (1972).

pubmed: 5046667 doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0972-42

Huh, J. R. & Veiga-Fernandes, H. Neuroimmune circuits in inter-organ communication. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 20, 217–228 (2020).

pubmed: 31848462 doi: 10.1038/s41577-019-0247-z

Kuppe, C. et al. Spatial multi-omic map of human myocardial infarction. Nature 608, 766–777 (2022). This study performs a spatiotemporal multi-omic profiling of myocardium from patients with myocardial infarction and controls, and compares CCC between conditions.

pubmed: 35948637 pmcid: 9364862 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05060-x

Garcia-Alonso, L. et al. Single-cell roadmap of human gonadal development. Nature 607, 540–547 (2022). This study presents a comprehensive spatiotemporal map of human gonadal differentiation using multi-omics and provides valuable insights into CCC during gonadal development.

pubmed: 35794482 pmcid: 9300467 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04918-4

Armingol, E., Officer, A., Harismendy, O. & Lewis, N. E. Deciphering cell–cell interactions and communication from gene expression. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 71–88 (2021). This review introduces the core concepts and applications of inferring CCIs and communication from transcriptomics data.

pubmed: 33168968 doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-00292-x

Almet, A. A., Cang, Z., Jin, S. & Nie, Q. The landscape of cell–cell communication through single-cell transcriptomics. Curr. Opin. Syst. Biol. 26, 12–23 (2021).

pubmed: 33969247 pmcid: 8104132 doi: 10.1016/j.coisb.2021.03.007

Shao, X., Lu, X., Liao, J., Chen, H. & Fan, X. New avenues for systematically inferring cell–cell communication: through single-cell transcriptomics data. Protein Cell 11, 866–880 (2020).

pubmed: 32435978 pmcid: 7719148 doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00727-5

Blencowe, M. et al. Network modeling of single-cell omics data: challenges, opportunities, and progresses. Emerg. Top. Life Sci. 3, 379–398 (2019).

pubmed: 32270049 pmcid: 7141415 doi: 10.1042/ETLS20180176

Wang, S. et al. A systematic evaluation of the computational tools for ligand–receptor-based cell–cell interaction inference. Brief. Funct. Genomics 21, 339–356 (2022).

pubmed: 35822343 pmcid: 9479691 doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elac019

Ma, F. et al. Applications and analytical tools of cell communication based on ligand–receptor interactions at single cell level. Cell Biosci. 11, 121 (2021).

pubmed: 34217372 pmcid: 8254218 doi: 10.1186/s13578-021-00635-z

Peng, L. et al. Cell–cell communication inference and analysis in the tumour microenvironments from single-cell transcriptomics: data resources and computational strategies. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac234 (2022).

pubmed: 35753695 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac234

Bridges, K. & Miller-Jensen, K. Mapping and validation of scRNA-seq-derived cell–cell communication networks in the tumor microenvironment. Front. Immunol. 13, 885267 (2022).

pubmed: 35572582 pmcid: 9096838 doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.885267

Wang, X., Almet, A. A. & Nie, Q. The promising application of cell–cell interaction analysis in cancer from single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Semin. Cancer Biol. 95, 42–51 (2023).

pubmed: 37454878 pmcid: 10627116 doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2023.07.001

Efremova, M., Vento-Tormo, M., Teichmann, S. A. & Vento-Tormo, R. CellPhoneDB: inferring cell–cell communication from combined expression of multi-subunit ligand–receptor complexes. Nat. Protoc. 15, 1484–1506 (2020). This protocol explains how to use CellPhoneDB, a highly used core tool to infer CCC.

pubmed: 32103204 doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0292-x

Jin, S. et al. Inference and analysis of cell–cell communication using CellChat. Nat. Commun. 12, 1088 (2021). This work presents CellChat, a highly used core tool to infer CCC, and the concept of mass action to predict CCIs.

pubmed: 33597522 pmcid: 7889871 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21246-9

Türei, D. et al. Integrated intra- and intercellular signaling knowledge for multicellular omics analysis. Mol. Syst. Biol. 17, e9923 (2021).

pubmed: 33749993 pmcid: 7983032 doi: 10.15252/msb.20209923

Wang, S., Karikomi, M., MacLean, A. L. & Nie, Q. Cell lineage and communication network inference via optimization for single-cell transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, e66 (2019). This work introduces SoptSC, a pioneering tool to study CCIs given the intracellular signals that are active in receiver cells. This tool also represents an early attempt to consider single-cell resolution of CCIs.

pubmed: 30923815 pmcid: 6582411 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz204

Browaeys, R., Saelens, W. & Saeys, Y. NicheNet: modeling intercellular communication by linking ligands to target genes. Nat. Methods 17, 159–162 (2019). This study introduces NicheNet, a tool based on network propagation, to rank LRIs involved in communication of cells.

pubmed: 31819264 doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0667-5

Herholt, A., Sahoo, V. K., Popovic, L., Wehr, M. C. & Rossner, M. J. Dissecting intercellular and intracellular signaling networks with barcoded genetic tools. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 66, 102091 (2022).

pubmed: 34644670 doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2021.09.002

Bechtel, T. J., Reyes-Robles, T., Fadeyi, O. O. & Oslund, R. C. Strategies for monitoring cell–cell interactions. Nat. Chem. Biol. 17, 641–652 (2021). This review highlights cutting-edge experimental methods to monitor CCIs including microscopy imaging, chemical tagging and engineering-based strategies.

pubmed: 34035514 doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00790-x

Yang, B. A., Westerhof, T. M., Sabin, K., Merajver, S. D. & Aguilar, C. A. Engineered tools to study intercellular communication. Adv. Sci. 8, 2002825 (2021).

doi: 10.1002/advs.202002825

Manhas, J., Edelstein, H. I., Leonard, J. N. & Morsut, L. The evolution of synthetic receptor systems. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 244–255 (2022).

pubmed: 35058646 pmcid: 9041813 doi: 10.1038/s41589-021-00926-z

Kwon, E. & Heo, W. D. Optogenetic tools for dissecting complex intracellular signaling pathways. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 527, 331–336 (2020).

pubmed: 31948753 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.12.132

Beitz, A. M., Oakes, C. G. & Galloway, K. E. Synthetic gene circuits as tools for drug discovery. Trends Biotechnol. 40, 210–225 (2022).

pubmed: 34364685 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2021.06.007

Kang, M.-G. & Rhee, H.-W. Molecular spatiomics by proximity labeling. Acc. Chem. Res. 55, 1411–1422 (2022).

pubmed: 35512328 pmcid: 9118551 doi: 10.1021/acs.accounts.2c00061

Norris, D. et al. Signaling heterogeneity is defined by pathway architecture and intercellular variability in protein expression. iScience 24, 102118 (2021).

pubmed: 33659881 pmcid: 7892930 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102118

Longo, S. K., Guo, M. G., Ji, A. L. & Khavari, P. A. Integrating single-cell and spatial transcriptomics to elucidate intercellular tissue dynamics. Nat. Rev. Genet. 22, 627–644 (2021).

pubmed: 34145435 pmcid: 9888017 doi: 10.1038/s41576-021-00370-8

Palla, G., Fischer, D. S., Regev, A. & Theis, F. J. Spatial components of molecular tissue biology. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 308–318 (2022).

pubmed: 35132261 doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01182-1

Walker, B. L., Cang, Z., Ren, H., Bourgain-Chang, E. & Nie, Q. Deciphering tissue structure and function using spatial transcriptomics. Commun. Biol. 5, 220 (2022).

pubmed: 35273328 pmcid: 8913632 doi: 10.1038/s42003-022-03175-5

Innes, B. T. & Bader, G. D. Transcriptional signatures of cell–cell interactions are dependent on cellular context. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.09.06.459134 (2021).

Armingol, E. et al. Context-aware deconvolution of cell–cell communication with Tensor-cell2cell. Nat. Commun. 13, 3665 (2022). This work presents an unsupervised method using tensor decomposition to extract patterns of CCC across multiple conditions simultaneously, going beyond pairwise comparisons that other methods only consider.

pubmed: 35760817 pmcid: 9237099 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-31369-2

Klumpe, H. E. et al. The context-dependent, combinatorial logic of BMP signaling. Cell Syst. 13, 388–407.e10 (2022).

pubmed: 35421361 pmcid: 9127470 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2022.03.002

Villemin, J.-P. et al. Inferring ligand–receptor cellular networks from bulk and spatial transcriptomic datasets with BulkSignalR. Nucleic Acids Res. 51, 4726–4744 (2023).

pubmed: 37144485 pmcid: 10250239 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad352

Choi, H. et al. Transcriptome analysis of individual stromal cell populations identifies stroma–tumor crosstalk in mouse lung cancer model. Cell Rep. 10, 1187–1201 (2015).

pubmed: 25704820 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.040

Ximerakis, M. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic profiling of the aging mouse brain. Nat. Neurosci. 22, 1696–1708 (2019).

pubmed: 31551601 doi: 10.1038/s41593-019-0491-3

Liu, Y. et al. FlyPhoneDB: an integrated web-based resource for cell–cell communication prediction in Drosophila. Genetics 220, iyab235 (2022).

pubmed: 35100387 doi: 10.1093/genetics/iyab235

Noël, F. et al. Dissection of intercellular communication using the transcriptome-based framework ICELLNET. Nat. Commun. 12, 1089 (2021).

pubmed: 33597528 pmcid: 7889941 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21244-x

Jin, Z. et al. InterCellDB: a user-defined database for inferring intercellular networks. Adv. Sci. 9, e2200045 (2022).

doi: 10.1002/advs.202200045

Xu, C., Ma, D., Ding, Q., Zhou, Y. & Zheng, H.-L. PlantPhoneDB: a manually curated pan-plant database of ligand–receptor pairs infers cell–cell communication. Plant. Biotechnol. J. 20, 2123–2134 (2022).

pubmed: 35842742 pmcid: 9616517 doi: 10.1111/pbi.13893

Cabello-Aguilar, S. et al. SingleCellSignalR: inference of intercellular networks from single-cell transcriptomics. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, e55 (2020).

pubmed: 32196115 pmcid: 7261168 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa183

Vahid, M. R. et al. DiSiR: fast and robust method to identify ligand–receptor interactions at subunit level from single-cell RNA-sequencing data. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 5, lqad030 (2023).

pubmed: 36968431 pmcid: 10034587 doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqad030

Raredon, M. S. B. et al. Comprehensive visualization of cell–cell interactions in single-cell and spatial transcriptomics with NICHES. Bioinformatics 39, btac775 (2023). This study introduces NICHES to study CCIs at the single-cell resolution, and presents different analyses that can be done by taking advantage of its resolution level.

pubmed: 36458905 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac775

Wilk, A. J., Shalek, A. K., Holmes, S. & Blish, C. A. Comparative analysis of cell–cell communication at single-cell resolution. Nat. Biotechnol. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41587-023-01782-z (2023). This work presents Scriabin to study CCIs at the single-cell resolution, and shows distinct biological applications that include the use of spatial transcriptomics.

Subedi, S. & Park, Y. P. Single-cell pair-wise relationships untangled by composite embedding model. iScience 26, 106025 (2023).

pubmed: 36824286 pmcid: 9941206 doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.106025

Kojima, Y. et al. Single-cell colocalization analysis using a deep generative model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.04.10.487815 (2022).

McMurdie, P. J. & Holmes, S. Waste not, want not: why rarefying microbiome data is inadmissible. PLoS Comput. Biol. 10, e1003531 (2014).

pubmed: 24699258 pmcid: 3974642 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003531

Armingol, E. et al. Inferring a spatial code of cell–cell interactions across a whole animal body. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1010715 (2022).

pubmed: 36395331 pmcid: 9714814 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010715

Ren, X. et al. Reconstruction of cell spatial organization from single-cell RNA sequencing data based on ligand–receptor mediated self-assembly. Cell Res. 30, 763–778 (2020).

pubmed: 32541867 pmcid: 7608415 doi: 10.1038/s41422-020-0353-2

Smart, M. & Zilman, A. Emergent properties of collective gene-expression patterns in multicellular systems. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 4, 101247 (2023).

doi: 10.1016/j.xcrp.2023.101247

Simsek, M. F. & Özbudak, E. M. Patterning principles of morphogen gradients. Open. Biol. 12, 220224 (2022).

pubmed: 36259238 pmcid: 9579920 doi: 10.1098/rsob.220224

Briscoe, J. & Small, S. Morphogen rules: design principles of gradient-mediated embryo patterning. Development 142, 3996–4009 (2015).

pubmed: 26628090 pmcid: 4712844 doi: 10.1242/dev.129452

Halpern, K. B. et al. Single-cell spatial reconstruction reveals global division of labour in the mammalian liver. Nature 542, 352–356 (2017).

pubmed: 28166538 pmcid: 5321580 doi: 10.1038/nature21065

Dries, R. et al. Giotto: a toolbox for integrative analysis and visualization of spatial expression data. Genome Biol. 22, 78 (2021).

pubmed: 33685491 pmcid: 7938609 doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02286-2

Palla, G. et al. Squidpy: a scalable framework for spatial omics analysis. Nat. Methods 19, 171–178 (2022).

pubmed: 35102346 pmcid: 8828470 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01358-2

Tanevski, J., Flores, R. O. R., Gabor, A., Schapiro, D. & Saez-Rodriguez, J. Explainable multiview framework for dissecting spatial relationships from highly multiplexed data. Genome Biol. 23, 97 (2022).

pubmed: 35422018 pmcid: 9011939 doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02663-5

Pham, D., Tan, X., Balderson, B. et al. Robust mapping of spatiotemporal trajectories and cell–cell interactions in healthy and diseased tissues. Nat. Commun. 14, 7739 (2023).

pubmed: 38007580 pmcid: 10676408 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-43120-6

Arnol, D., Schapiro, D., Bodenmiller, B., Saez-Rodriguez, J. & Stegle, O. Modeling cell–cell interactions from spatial molecular data with spatial variance component analysis. Cell Rep. 29, 202–211.e6 (2019). This work evaluates the gene expression variability in space given the impact of CCIs.

pubmed: 31577949 pmcid: 6899515 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.077

Garcia-Alonso, L. et al. Mapping the temporal and spatial dynamics of the human endometrium in vivo and in vitro. Nat. Genet. 53, 1698–1711 (2021).

pubmed: 34857954 pmcid: 8648563 doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00972-2

Li, D., Ding, J. & Bar-Joseph, Z. Identifying signaling genes in spatial single-cell expression data. Bioinformatics 37, 968–975 (2021).

pubmed: 32886099 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa769

Fischer, D. S., Schaar, A. C. & Theis, F. J. Modeling intercellular communication in tissues using spatial graphs of cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 332–336 (2022). This work introduces NCEM, a regression-based model that uses spatial graphs and gene expression to study CCIs from their niches defined using spatial transcriptomics.

pubmed: 36302986 pmcid: 10017508 doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01467-z

Shao, X. et al. Knowledge-graph-based cell–cell communication inference for spatially resolved transcriptomic data with SpaTalk. Nat. Commun. 13, 4429 (2022).

pubmed: 35908020 pmcid: 9338929 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32111-8

Pancheva, A., Wheadon, H., Rogers, S. & Otto, T. D. Using topic modeling to detect cellular crosstalk in scRNA-seq. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1009975 (2022).

pubmed: 35395014 pmcid: 9064087 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009975

Tsuchiya, T., Hori, H. & Ozaki, H. CCPLS reveals cell-type-specific spatial dependence of transcriptomes in single cells. Bioinformatics 38, 4868–4877 (2022).

pubmed: 36063454 pmcid: 9620831 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac599

Ru, B., Huang, J., Zhang, Y., Aldape, K. & Jiang, P. Estimation of cell lineages in tumors from spatial transcriptomics data. Nat. Commun. 14, 568 (2023).

pubmed: 36732531 pmcid: 9895078 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36062-6

Cang, Z. et al. Screening cell–cell communication in spatial transcriptomics via collective optimal transport. Nat. Methods 20, 218–228 (2023). This work introduces COMMOT, a tool using collective optimal transport to study CCC with spatial transcriptomics. This approach includes competing signals and can evaluate signalling directionality within tissues.

pubmed: 36690742 pmcid: 9911355 doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01728-4

Rao, N. et al. Charting spatial ligand–target activity using Renoir. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.14.536833 (2023).

Qu, F. et al. Three-dimensional molecular architecture of mouse organogenesis. Nat. Commun. 14, 4599 (2023).

pubmed: 37524711 pmcid: 10390492 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40155-7

Lück, N. et al. SpaCeNet: spatial cellular networks from omics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.09.01.506219 (2022).

Cheng, J., Yan, L., Nie, Q. & Sun, X. Modeling spatial intercellular communication and multilayer signaling regulations using stMLnet. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.27.497696 (2022).

So, E., Hayat, S., Nair, S. K., Wang, B. & Haibe-Kains, B. GraphComm: a graph-based deep learning method to predict cell–cell communication in single-cell RNAseq data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.26.538432 (2023).

Li, H. et al. Decoding functional cell-cell communication events by multi-view graph learning on spatial transcriptomics. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbad359 (2023).

pubmed: 37824741 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbad359

Li, Z., Wang, T., Liu, P. & Huang, Y. SpatialDM for rapid identification of spatially co-expressed ligand–receptor and revealing cell–cell communication patterns. Nat. Commun. 14, 3995 (2023).

pubmed: 37414760 pmcid: 10325966 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39608-w

Baccin, C. et al. Combined single-cell and spatial transcriptomics reveal the molecular, cellular and spatial bone marrow niche organization. Nat. Cell Biol. 22, 38–48 (2020).

pubmed: 31871321 doi: 10.1038/s41556-019-0439-6

Cang, Z. & Nie, Q. Inferring spatial and signaling relationships between cells from single cell transcriptomic data. Nat. Commun. 11, 2084 (2020). This work introduces SpaOTsc, a pioneering tool to study single-cell CCIs using spatial transcriptomics by using an optimal transport algorithm.

pubmed: 32350282 pmcid: 7190659 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-15968-5

Wang, J., Li, S., Chen, L. & Li, S. C. SPROUT: spectral sparsification helps restore the spatial structure at single-cell resolution. Nar. Genom. Bioinform 4, lqac069 (2022).

pubmed: 36128423 pmcid: 9477078 doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqac069

Ghaddar, B. & De, S. Reconstructing physical cell interaction networks from single-cell data using Neighbor-seq. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, e82 (2022).

pubmed: 35536255 pmcid: 9371920 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac333

Yuan, Y. & Bar-Joseph, Z. GCNG: graph convolutional networks for inferring gene interaction from spatial transcriptomics data. Genome Biol. 21, 300 (2020).

pubmed: 33303016 pmcid: 7726911 doi: 10.1186/s13059-020-02214-w

Li, R. & Yang, X. De novo reconstruction of cell interaction landscapes from single-cell spatial transcriptome data with DeepLinc. Genome Biol. 23, 124 (2022).

pubmed: 35659722 pmcid: 9164488 doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02692-0

Tang, Z., Zhang, T., Yang, B., Su, J. & Song, Q. spaCI: deciphering spatial cellular communications through adaptive graph model. Brief. Bioinform. 24, bbac563 (2023).

pubmed: 36545790 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac563

Kim, H. et al. CellNeighborEX: deciphering neighbor-dependent gene expression from spatial transcriptomics data. Mol. Syst. Biol. 19, e11670 (2023).

pubmed: 37815040 pmcid: 10632736 doi: 10.15252/msb.202311670

Wu, D., Gaskins, J. T., Sekula, M. & Datta, S. Inferring cell–cell communications from spatially resolved transcriptomics data using a Bayesian Tweedie model. Genes 14, 1368 (2023).

pubmed: 37510272 pmcid: 10379215 doi: 10.3390/genes14071368

Montesuma, E. F., Mboula, F. N. & Souloumiac, A. Recent advances in optimal transport for machine learning. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.16156 (2023).

Bafna, M., Li, H. & Zhang, X. CLARIFY: cell–cell interaction and gene regulatory network refinement from spatially resolved transcriptomics. Bioinformatics 39, i484–i493 (2023).

pubmed: 37387180 pmcid: 10311313 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad269

Ghaddar, A. et al. Whole-body gene expression atlas of an adult metazoan. Sci. Adv. 9, eadg0506 (2023).

pubmed: 37352352 pmcid: 10289653 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adg0506

Liu, Z., Sun, D. & Wang, C. Evaluation of cell–cell interaction methods by integrating single-cell RNA sequencing data with spatial information. Genome Biol. 23, 218 (2022).

pubmed: 36253792 pmcid: 9575221 doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02783-y

Caviglia, S. & Ober, E. A. Non-conventional protrusions: the diversity of cell interactions at short and long distance. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 54, 106–113 (2018).

pubmed: 29890397 doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2018.05.013

Metzner, C. et al. Detecting long-range interactions between migrating cells. Sci. Rep. 11, 15031 (2021).

pubmed: 34294808 pmcid: 8298713 doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-94458-0

Paul, O., Tao, J. Q., Guo, X. & Chatterjee, S. in Endothelial Signaling in Vascular Dysfunction and Disease Ch. 1 (ed. Chatterjee, S.) 3–13 (Academic, 2021).

Zheng, R. et al. MEBOCOST: metabolic cell–cell communication modeling by single cell transcriptome. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.30.494067 (2022).

Buccitelli, C. & Selbach, M. mRNAs, proteins and the emerging principles of gene expression control. Nat. Rev. Genet. 21, 630–644 (2020).

pubmed: 32709985 doi: 10.1038/s41576-020-0258-4

Zhao, W., Johnston, K. G., Ren, H., Xu, X. & Nie, Q. Inferring neuron–neuron communications from single-cell transcriptomics through NeuronChat. Nat. Commun. 14, 1–16 (2023). This work presents NeuronChat, a tool for studying CCIs in neuroscience that is particularly designed to study different kinds of molecules used by neurons to communicate.

Jakobsson, J. E. T., Spjuth, O. & Lagerström, M. C. scConnect: a method for exploratory analysis of cell–cell communication based on single cell RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 37, 3501–3508 (2021).

pubmed: 33974001 pmcid: 8545319 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab245

Cui, K. et al. Epsin nanotherapy regulates cholesterol transport to fortify atheroma regression. Circ. Res. 132, e22–e42 (2023).

pubmed: 36444722 doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.122.321723

Lempp, M. et al. Systematic identification of metabolites controlling gene expression in E. coli. Nat. Commun. 10, 4463 (2019).

pubmed: 31578326 pmcid: 6775132 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12474-1

Baruzzo, G., Cesaro, G. & Di Camillo, B. Identify, quantify and characterize cellular communication from single-cell RNA sequencing data with scSeqComm. Bioinformatics 38, 1920–1929 (2022).

pubmed: 35043939 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac036

Hu, Y., Peng, T., Gao, L. & Tan, K. CytoTalk: de novo construction of signal transduction networks using single-cell transcriptomic data. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf1356 (2021).

pubmed: 33853780 pmcid: 8046375 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1356

Xin, Y. et al. LRLoop: a method to predict feedback loops in cell–cell communication. Bioinformatics 38, 4117–4126 (2022). This work leverages the strategies that use intracellular signalling pathways to incorporate the concept of feedback loops between two interacting cells to improve the predictions of CCC and produce more biological meaningful results.

pubmed: 35788263 pmcid: 9438954 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac447

Cherry, C. et al. Computational reconstruction of the signalling networks surrounding implanted biomaterials from single-cell transcriptomics. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1228–1238 (2021).

pubmed: 34341534 pmcid: 9894531 doi: 10.1038/s41551-021-00770-5

Jung, S., Singh, K. & Del Sol, A. FunRes: resolving tissue-specific functional cell states based on a cell–cell communication network model. Brief. Bioinform. 22, bbaa283 (2021).

pubmed: 33179736 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa283

Mishra, V. et al. Systematic elucidation of neuron–astrocyte interaction in models of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis using multi-modal integrated bioinformatics workflow. Nat. Commun. 11, 5579 (2020).

pubmed: 33149111 pmcid: 7642391 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19177-y

Zhang, Y. et al. CellCall: integrating paired ligand–receptor and transcription factor activities for cell–cell communication. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 8520–8534 (2021).

pubmed: 34331449 pmcid: 8421219 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab638

Cheng, J., Zhang, J., Wu, Z. & Sun, X. Inferring microenvironmental regulation of gene expression from single-cell RNA sequencing data using scMLnet with an application to COVID-19. Brief. Bioinform. 22, 988–1005 (2021).

pubmed: 33341869 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa327

Lummertz da Rocha, E. et al. CellComm infers cellular crosstalk that drives haematopoietic stem and progenitor cell development. Nat. Cell Biol. 24, 579–589 (2022).

pubmed: 35414020 doi: 10.1038/s41556-022-00884-1

He, C., Zhou, P. & Nie, Q. exFINDER: identify external communication signals using single-cell transcriptomics data. Nucleic Acids Res. 15, e58 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad262

Cowen, L., Ideker, T., Raphael, B. J. & Sharan, R. Network propagation: a universal amplifier of genetic associations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 18, 551–562 (2017).

pubmed: 28607512 doi: 10.1038/nrg.2017.38

Shakiba, N., Jones, R. D., Weiss, R. & Del Vecchio, D. Context-aware synthetic biology by controller design: engineering the mammalian cell. Cell Syst. 12, 561–592 (2021).

pubmed: 34139166 pmcid: 8261833 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.05.011

Palsson, B. & Zengler, K. The challenges of integrating multi-omic data sets. Nat. Chem. Biol. 6, 787–789 (2010).

pubmed: 20976870 doi: 10.1038/nchembio.462

Raredon, M. S. B. et al. Computation and visualization of cell–cell signaling topologies in single-cell systems data using connectome. Sci. Rep. 12, 4187 (2022).

pubmed: 35264704 pmcid: 8906120 doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07959-x

Hao, M., Zou, X. & Jin, S. Identification of intercellular signaling changes across conditions and their influence on intracellular signaling response from multiple single-cell datasets. Front. Genet. 12, 751158 (2021).

pubmed: 34858473 pmcid: 8632559 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.751158

Vu, R. et al. Wound healing in aged skin exhibits systems-level alterations in cellular composition and cell–cell communication. Cell Rep. 40, 111155 (2022).

pubmed: 35926463 pmcid: 9901190 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111155

Lagger, C. et al. scDiffCom: a tool for differential analysis of cell–cell interactions provides a mouse atlas of aging changes in intercellular communication. Nat. Aging 3, 1446–1461 (2023).

pubmed: 37919434 pmcid: 10645595 doi: 10.1038/s43587-023-00514-x

Yang, Y. et al. scTenifoldXct: a semi-supervised method for predicting cell–cell interactions and mapping cellular communication graphs. Cell Syst. 14, 302–311.e4 (2023). This work introduces scTenifoldXct, a tool that infer CCIs by combining gene-regulatory networks, gene expression and neural networks. It can infer interacting genes that are not limited to LRIs.

pubmed: 36787742 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.01.004

Cillo, A. R. et al. Immune landscape of viral- and carcinogen-driven head and neck cancer. Immunity 52, 183–199.e9 (2020).

pubmed: 31924475 pmcid: 7201194 doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.11.014

Yuan, Y. et al. CINS: cell interaction network inference from single cell expression data. PLoS Comput. Biol. 18, e1010468 (2022).

pubmed: 36095011 pmcid: 9499239 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010468

Lu, H. et al. CommPath: an R package for inference and analysis of pathway-mediated cell–cell communication chain from single-cell transcriptomics. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 20, 5978–5983 (2022).

pubmed: 36382188 pmcid: 9647193 doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.10.028

Solovey, M. & Scialdone, A. COMUNET: a tool to explore and visualize intercellular communication. Bioinformatics 36, 4296–4300 (2020).

pubmed: 32399572 pmcid: 7520036 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa482

Nagai, J. S., Leimkühler, N. B., Schaub, M. T., Schneider, R. K. & Costa, I. G. CrossTalkeR: analysis and visualization of ligand–receptor networks. Bioinformatics 37, 4263–4265 (2021).

pubmed: 35032393 pmcid: 9502146 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab370

Mitchel, J. et al. Tensor decomposition reveals coordinated multicellular patterns of transcriptional variation that distinguish and stratify disease individuals. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.02.16.480703 (2022).

Jerby-Arnon, L. & Regev, A. DIALOGUE maps multicellular programs in tissue from single-cell or spatial transcriptomics data. Nat. Biotechnol. 40, 1467–1477 (2022).

pubmed: 35513526 pmcid: 9547813 doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01288-0

Ramirez Flores, R. O., Lanzer, J. D., Dimitrov, D., Velten, B. & Saez-Rodriguez, J. Multicellular factor analysis of single-cell data for a tissue-centric understanding of disease. eLife 12, e93161 (2023).

pubmed: 37991480 pmcid: 10718529 doi: 10.7554/eLife.93161

Guilliams, M. et al. Spatial proteogenomics reveals distinct and evolutionarily conserved hepatic macrophage niches. Cell 185, 379–396.e38 (2022).

pubmed: 35021063 pmcid: 8809252 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.018

Wang, Y. et al. iTALK: an R package to characterize and illustrate intercellular communication. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/507871 (2019).

Hou, R., Denisenko, E., Ong, H. T., Ramilowski, J. A. & Forrest, A. R. R. Predicting cell-to-cell communication networks using NATMI. Nat. Commun. 11, 5011 (2020).

pubmed: 33024107 pmcid: 7538930 doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18873-z

Tyler, S. R. et al. PyMINEr finds gene and autocrine–paracrine networks from human islet scRNA-seq. Cell Rep. 26, 1951–1964.e8 (2019).

pubmed: 30759402 pmcid: 6394844 doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.01.063

Li, D. et al. TraSig: inferring cell–cell interactions from pseudotime ordering of scRNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 23, 73 (2022).

pubmed: 35255944 pmcid: 8900372 doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02629-7

Wang, L. et al. TimeTalk uses single-cell RNA-seq datasets to decipher cell–cell communication during early embryo development. Commun. Biol. 6, 901 (2023).

pubmed: 37660148 pmcid: 10475079 doi: 10.1038/s42003-023-05283-2

Browaeys, R. et al. MultiNicheNet: a flexible framework for differential cell–cell communication analysis from multi-sample multi-condition single-cell transcriptomics data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.06.13.544751 (2023).

Liu, Q., Hsu, C.-Y., Li, J. & Shyr, Y. Dysregulated ligand–receptor interactions from single-cell transcriptomics. Bioinformatics 38, 3216–3221 (2022).

pubmed: 35482476 pmcid: 9191214 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac294

Wang, K. et al. Deconvolving clinically relevant cellular immune cross-talk from bulk gene expression using CODEFACS and LIRICS stratifies patients with melanoma to anti-PD-1 therapy. Cancer Discov. 12, 1088–1105 (2022).

pubmed: 34983745 pmcid: 8983586 doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0887

Chin, J. L., Chan, L. C., Yeaman, M. R. & Meyer, A. S. Tensor-based insights into systems immunity and infectious disease. Trends Immunol. 44, 329–332 (2023).

pubmed: 36997459 doi: 10.1016/j.it.2023.03.003

Armingol, E., Larsen, R. O., Cequeira, M., Baghdassarian, H. & Lewis, N. E. Unraveling the coordinated dynamics of protein- and metabolite-mediated cell–cell communication. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.11.02.514917 (2022).

Robinson, M. D., McCarthy, D. J. & Smyth, G. K. edgeR: a bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics 26, 139–140 (2009).

pubmed: 19910308 pmcid: 2796818 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616

Interlandi, M., Kerl, K. & Dugas, M. InterCellar enables interactive analysis and exploration of cell–cell communication in single-cell transcriptomic data. Commun. Biol. 5, 21 (2022).

pubmed: 35017628 pmcid: 8752611 doi: 10.1038/s42003-021-02986-2

Zhang, Y. et al. Cellinker: a platform of ligand–receptor interactions for intercellular communication analysis. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab036 (2021).

doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab036 pubmed: 34930120 pmcid: 10060701

Moratalla-Navarro, F., Moreno, V. & Sanz-Pamplona, R. TALKIEN: crossTALK IntEraction Network. A web-based tool for deciphering molecular communication through ligand–receptor interactions. Mol. Omics 19, 688–696 (2023).

pubmed: 37403821 doi: 10.1039/D3MO00049D

Yang, W. et al. DeepCCI: a deep learning framework for identifying cell–cell interactions from single-cell RNA sequencing data. Bioinformatics 39, btad596 (2023).

pubmed: 37740953 pmcid: 10558043 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btad596

Liu, S., Zhang, Y., Peng, J. & Shang, X. An improved hierarchical variational autoencoder for cell–cell communication estimation using single-cell RNA-seq data. Brief. Funct. Genomics https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elac056 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elac056 pubmed: 37642217

Dimitrov, D. et al. Comparison of methods and resources for cell–cell communication inference from single-cell RNA-seq data. Nat. Commun. 13, 3224 (2022). This study introduces LIANA, a computational tool including multiple existing strategies to infer CCIs and distinct ligand–receptor resources. In addition, LIANA implements a consensus approach across other methods to more robustly infer intercellular communication.

pubmed: 35680885 pmcid: 9184522 doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-30755-0

Lu, M. et al. LR hunting: a random forest based cell–cell interaction discovery method for single-cell gene expression data. Front. Genet. 12, 708835 (2021).

pubmed: 34497635 pmcid: 8420858 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.708835

van Santvoort, M., Lapuente-Santana, Ó., Finotello, F., van der Hoorn, P. & Eduati, F. Mathematically mapping the network of cells in the tumor microenvironment. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.02.03.526946 (2023).

Yu, A. et al. Reconstructing codependent cellular cross-talk in lung adenocarcinoma using REMI. Sci. Adv. 8, eabi4757 (2022).

pubmed: 35302849 pmcid: 8932661 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abi4757

Li, H., Zhang, Z., Squires, M., Chen, X. & Zhang, X. scMultiSim: simulation of multi-modality single cell data guided by cell–cell interactions and gene regulatory networks. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.15.512320 (2022).

Tsuyuzaki, K., Ishii, M. & Nikaido, I. Sctensor detects many-to-many cell–cell interactions from single cell RNA-sequencing data. BMC. Bioinformatics 24, 420 (2023).

pubmed: 37936079 pmcid: 10631077

Burdziak, C. et al. Epigenetic plasticity cooperates with cell–cell interactions to direct pancreatic tumorigenesis. Science 380, eadd5327 (2023).

pubmed: 37167403 pmcid: 10316746 doi: 10.1126/science.add5327

Peng, L. et al. Deciphering ligand–receptor-mediated intercellular communication based on ensemble deep learning and the joint scoring strategy from single-cell transcriptomic data. Comput. Biol. Med. 163, 107137 (2023).

pubmed: 37364528 doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2023.107137

Peng, L. et al. CellEnBoost: a boosting-based ligand–receptor interaction identification model for cell-to-cell communication inference. IEEE Trans. Nanobioscience 22, 705–715 (2023).

pubmed: 37216267 doi: 10.1109/TNB.2023.3278685

Zhang, C., Gao, L., Hu, Y. & Huang, Z. RobustCCC: a robustness evaluation tool for cell–cell communication methods. Front. Genet. 14, 1236956 (2023).

pubmed: 37547470 pmcid: 10400800 doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1236956

Raghavan, V. & Ding, J. Harnessing agent-based modeling in cellagentchat to unravel cell–cell interactions from single-cell data. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.23.554489 (2023).

Luo, J., Deng, M., Zhang, X. & Sun, X. ESICCC as a systematic computational framework for evaluation, selection, and integration of cell–cell communication inference methods. Genome Res. 33, 1788–1805 (2023).

pubmed: 37827697 pmcid: 10691505 doi: 10.1101/gr.278001.123

Boisset, J.-C. et al. Mapping the physical network of cellular interactions. Nat. Methods 15, 547–553 (2018).

pubmed: 29786092 doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0009-z

Giladi, A. et al. Dissecting cellular crosstalk by sequencing physically interacting cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 629–637 (2020).

pubmed: 32152598 doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0442-2

Clark, I. C. et al. Barcoded viral tracing of single-cell interactions in central nervous system inflammation. Science 372, eabf1230 (2021). This study shows how CCI networks can be traced through RABID-seq, a novel method using engineered rabies viruses to track cell–cell contacts in the brain and their molecular mechanisms.

pubmed: 33888612 pmcid: 8157482 doi: 10.1126/science.abf1230

Pasqual, G. et al. Monitoring T cell–dendritic cell interactions in vivo by intercellular enzymatic labelling. Nature 553, 496–500 (2018). This work developed LIPSTIC, SrtA-mediated cell labelling, to study dynamic CCIs both in vitro and in vivo.

pubmed: 29342141 pmcid: 5853129 doi: 10.1038/nature25442

Ge, Y. et al. Enzyme-mediated intercellular proximity labeling for detecting cell–cell interactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 1833–1837 (2019).

pubmed: 30676735 doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b10286

Liu, Z. et al. Detecting tumor antigen-specific T cells via interaction-dependent fucosyl-biotinylation. Cell 183, 1117–1133.e19 (2020).

pubmed: 33096019 pmcid: 7669731 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.048

Oslund, R. C. et al. Detection of cell–cell interactions via photocatalytic cell tagging. Nat. Chem. Biol. 18, 850–858 (2022). This study introduces PhoTag, a photocatalytic cell tagging method, for interrogating CCC and LRIs in cell–cell contacts.

pubmed: 35654846 doi: 10.1038/s41589-022-01044-0

Zhang, S. et al. Monitoring of cell–cell communication and contact history in mammals. Science 378, eabo5503 (2022). This study presents an approach to trace cell–cell contacts in vivo by modifying synthetic receptor systems, and applies it to analyse endothelial cell migration, their contacts and ligand–receptor mechanisms.

pubmed: 36454848 doi: 10.1126/science.abo5503

Peikon, I. D. et al. Using high-throughput barcode sequencing to efficiently map connectomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, e115 (2017).

pubmed: 28449067 pmcid: 5499584 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx292

Kebschull, J. M. et al. High-throughput mapping of single-neuron projections by sequencing of barcoded RNA. Neuron 91, 975–987 (2016).

pubmed: 27545715 pmcid: 6640135 doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.036

Huang, L. et al. BRICseq bridges brain-wide interregional connectivity to neural activity and gene expression in single animals. Cell 183, 2040 (2020).

pubmed: 33357401 pmcid: 8830377 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.009

Wheeler, M. A. et al. Droplet-based forward genetic screening of astrocyte–microglia cross-talk. Science 379, 1023–1030 (2023).

pubmed: 36893254 pmcid: 10066924 doi: 10.1126/science.abq4822

Niu, M. et al. Droplet-based transcriptome profiling of individual synapses. Nat. Biotechnol. 41, 1332–1344 (2023).

pubmed: 36646931 doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01635-1

Aamodt, C. M. & Lewis, N. E. Single-cell A/B testing for cell–cell communication. Cell Syst. 14, 428–429 (2023).

pubmed: 37348460 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2023.05.006

Geri, J. B. et al. Microenvironment mapping via Dexter energy transfer on immune cells. Science 367, 1091–1097 (2020).

pubmed: 32139536 pmcid: 7336666 doi: 10.1126/science.aay4106

Branon, T. C. et al. Efficient proximity labeling in living cells and organisms with TurboID. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 880–887 (2018).

pubmed: 30125270 pmcid: 6126969 doi: 10.1038/nbt.4201

Qiu, S. et al. Use of intercellular proximity labeling to quantify and decipher cell–cell interactions directed by diversified molecular pairs. Sci. Adv. 8, eadd2337 (2022).

pubmed: 36542702 pmcid: 9770995 doi: 10.1126/sciadv.add2337

Nakandakari-Higa, S. et al. Universal recording of cell–cell contacts in vivo for interaction-based transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.16.533003 (2023).

Martell, J. D. et al. Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 1143–1148 (2012).

pubmed: 23086203 pmcid: 3699407 doi: 10.1038/nbt.2375

Qin, W. et al. Dynamic mapping of proteome trafficking within and between living cells by TransitID. Cell 186, 3307–3324.e30 (2023).

pubmed: 37385249 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.05.044

Cho, K. F. et al. Proximity labeling in mammalian cells with TurboID and split-TurboID. Nat. Protoc. 15, 3971–3999 (2020).

pubmed: 33139955 doi: 10.1038/s41596-020-0399-0

Lam, S. S. et al. Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat. Methods 12, 51–54 (2015).

pubmed: 25419960 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3179

Sears, R. M., May, D. G. & Roux, K. J. BioID as a tool for protein-proximity labeling in living cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 2012, 299–313 (2019).

pubmed: 31161514 pmcid: 6583792 doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-9546-2_15

Cho, K. F. et al. Split-TurboID enables contact-dependent proximity labeling in cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 117, 12143–12154 (2020).

pubmed: 32424107 pmcid: 7275672 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1919528117

Wintgens, J. P., Wichert, S. P., Popovic, L., Rossner, M. J. & Wehr, M. C. Monitoring activities of receptor tyrosine kinases using a universal adapter in genetically encoded split TEV assays. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 76, 1185–1199 (2019).

pubmed: 30623207 pmcid: 6675780 doi: 10.1007/s00018-018-03003-2

Saraon, P. et al. A drug discovery platform to identify compounds that inhibit EGFR triple mutants. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 577–586 (2020).

pubmed: 32094923 pmcid: 8123931 doi: 10.1038/s41589-020-0484-2

Morsut, L. et al. Engineering customized cell sensing and response behaviors using synthetic notch receptors. Cell 164, 780–791 (2016).

pubmed: 26830878 pmcid: 4752866 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.01.012

Huang, H. et al. Cell–cell contact-induced gene editing/activation in mammalian cells using a synNotch–CRISPR/Cas9 system. Protein Cell 11, 299–303 (2020).

pubmed: 32002793 pmcid: 7093359 doi: 10.1007/s13238-020-00690-1

Malaguti, M. et al. SyNPL: synthetic Notch pluripotent cell lines to monitor and manipulate cell interactions in vitro and in vivo. Development 149, dev200226 (2022).

pubmed: 35616331 pmcid: 9270970 doi: 10.1242/dev.200226

Kumar, A., Grams, T. R., Bloom, D. C. & Toth, Z. Signaling pathway reporter screen with SARS-CoV-2 proteins identifies nsp5 as a repressor of p53 activity. Viruses 14, 1039 (2022).

pubmed: 35632779 pmcid: 9145535 doi: 10.3390/v14051039

Jones, E. M. et al. A scalable, multiplexed assay for decoding GPCR–ligand interactions with RNA sequencing. Cell Syst. 8, 254–260.e6 (2019).

pubmed: 30904378 pmcid: 6907015 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2019.02.009

Franchini, L. & Orlandi, C. in Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science Vol. 195 Ch. 3 (ed. Shukla, A. K.) 47–76 (Academic, 2023).

Karikomi, M., Zhou, P. & Nie, Q. DURIAN: an integrative deconvolution and imputation method for robust signaling analysis of single-cell transcriptomics data. Brief. Bioinform. 23, bbac223 (2022).

pubmed: 35709795 pmcid: 9294432 doi: 10.1093/bib/bbac223

Jin, S., Plikus, M. V. & Nie, Q. CellChat for systematic analysis of cell–cell communication from single-cell and spatially resolved transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.11.05.565674 (2023).

Troulé, K. et al. CellPhoneDB v5: inferring cell–cell communication from single-cell multiomics data. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311.04567 (2023).

Dimitrov, D. et al. LIANA+: an all-in-one cell–cell communication framework. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.19.553863 (2023).

Xie, Y. et al. A global database for modeling tumor-immune cell communication. Sci. Data 10, 444 (2023).

pubmed: 37438390 pmcid: 10338499 doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02342-5

Jumper, J. et al. Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold. Nature 596, 583–589 (2021).

pubmed: 34265844 pmcid: 8371605 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2

Danneskiold-Samsøe, N. B. et al. Rapid and accurate deorphanization of ligand–receptor pairs using AlphaFold. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.16.531341 (2023).

Su, C. J. et al. Ligand–receptor promiscuity enables cellular addressing. Cell Syst. 13, 408–425.e12 (2022).

pubmed: 35421362 doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2022.03.001

Ma, Q., Li, Q., Zheng, X. & Pan, J. CellCommuNet: an atlas of cell–cell communication networks from single-cell RNA sequencing of human and mouse tissues in normal and disease states. Nucleic Acids Res. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkad906 (2023).

doi: 10.1093/nar/gkad906 pubmed: 38153123 pmcid: 10768125

Shan, N. et al. CITEdb: a manually curated database of cell–cell interactions in human. Bioinformatics 38, 5144–5148 (2022).

pubmed: 36179089 pmcid: 9665858 doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btac654

Xie, Z., Li, X. & Mora, A. A comparison of cell–cell interaction prediction tools based on scRNA-seq data. Biomolecules 13, 1211 (2023).

pubmed: 37627276 pmcid: 10452151 doi: 10.3390/biom13081211

Shilts, J. et al. A physical wiring diagram for the human immune system. Nature 608, 397–404 (2022).

pubmed: 35922511 pmcid: 9365698 doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05028-x

Belardi, B., Son, S., Felce, J. H., Dustin, M. L. & Fletcher, D. A. Cell–cell interfaces as specialized compartments directing cell function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21, 750–764 (2020).

pubmed: 33093672 doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00298-7

Castro, A. et al. Subcellular location of source proteins improves prediction of neoantigens for immunotherapy. EMBO J. 41, e111071 (2022).

pubmed: 36314681 pmcid: 9753441 doi: 10.15252/embj.2022111071

Hickey, J. W. et al. Spatial mapping of protein composition and tissue organization: a primer for multiplexed antibody-based imaging. Nat. Methods 19, 284–295 (2022).

pubmed: 34811556 doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01316-y

Goltsev, Y. et al. Deep profiling of mouse splenic architecture with CODEX multiplexed imaging. Cell 174, 968–981.e15 (2018).

pubmed: 30078711 pmcid: 6086938 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.07.010

Kim, K.-E. et al. Dynamic tracking and identification of tissue-specific secretory proteins in the circulation of live mice. Nat. Commun. 12, 5204 (2021).

pubmed: 34471136 pmcid: 8410947 doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25546-y

Seth, A. et al. High-resolution imaging of protein secretion at the single-cell level using plasmon-enhanced FluoroDOT assay. Cell Rep. Methods 2, 100267 (2022).

pubmed: 36046626 pmcid: 9421537 doi: 10.1016/j.crmeth.2022.100267

Verweij, F. J. et al. Live tracking of inter-organ communication by endogenous exosomes in vivo. Dev. Cell 48, 573–589.e4 (2019).

pubmed: 30745143 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2019.01.004

Rittaud, B. & Heeffer, A. The pigeonhole principle, two centuries before Dirichlet. Math. Intell. 36, 27–29 (2014).

doi: 10.1007/s00283-013-9389-1

Stein-O’Brien, G. L. et al. Enter the matrix: factorization uncovers knowledge from omics. Trends Genet. 34, 790–805 (2018).

pubmed: 30143323 pmcid: 6309559 doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2018.07.003

Baghdassarian, H., Dimitrov, D., Armingol, E., Saez-Rodriguez, J. & Lewis, N. E. Combining LIANA and Tensor-cell2cell to decipher cell–cell communication across multiple samples. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.28.538731 (2023).

doi: 10.1101/2023.04.28.538731 pubmed: 37162916 pmcid: 10168343

Yuan, D., Tao, Y., Chen, G. & Shi, T. Systematic expression analysis of ligand–receptor pairs reveals important cell-to-cell interactions inside glioma. Cell Commun. Signal. 17, 48 (2019).

pubmed: 31118022 pmcid: 6532229 doi: 10.1186/s12964-019-0363-1

Chen, L.-X. et al. Cell–cell communications shape tumor microenvironment and predict clinical outcomes in clear cell renal carcinoma. J. Transl. Med. 21, 113 (2023).

pubmed: 36765369 pmcid: 9921120 doi: 10.1186/s12967-022-03858-x

Angermueller, C., Pärnamaa, T., Parts, L. & Stegle, O. Deep learning for computational biology. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12, 878 (2016).

pubmed: 27474269 pmcid: 4965871 doi: 10.15252/msb.20156651

Naveed, H. et al. A comprehensive overview of large language models. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2307.06435 (2023).

Lubiana, T. et al. Ten quick tips for harnessing the power of ChatGPT in computational biology. PLoS Comput. Biol. 19, e1011319 (2023).

pubmed: 37561669 pmcid: 10414555 doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011319

Ma, A. et al. Single-cell biological network inference using a heterogeneous graph transformer. Nat. Commun. 14, 964 (2023).

pubmed: 36810839 pmcid: 9944243 doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-36559-0

Cui, H. et al. scGPT: towards building a foundation model for single-cell multi-omics using generative AI. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.30.538439 (2023).

Hao, M. et al. Large scale foundation model on single-cell transcriptomics. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.05.29.542705 (2023).

The diversification of methods for studying cell-cell interactions and communication.

Journal

Informations de publication

Résumé

Identifiants

Types de publication

Langues

Sous-ensembles de citation

Informations de copyright

Références

Auteurs

Erick Armingol (E)

Hratch M Baghdassarian (HM)

Nathan E Lewis (NE)

Classifications MeSH