Sick individuals, sick populations revisited: a test of the Rose hypothesis for type 2 diabetes disparities.


Journal

BMJ public health
ISSN: 2753-4294
Titre abrégé: BMJ Public Health
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9918697578906676

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
medline: 19 1 2024
pubmed: 19 1 2024
entrez: 19 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The Rose hypothesis predicts that since genetic variation is greater within than between populations, genetic risk factors will be associated with individuals' risk of disease but not population disparities, and since socioenvironmental variation is greater between than within populations, socioenvironmental risk factors will be associated with population disparities but not individuals' disease risk. We used the UK Biobank to test the Rose hypothesis for type 2 diabetes (T2D) ethnic disparities in the UK. Our cohort consists of 26 912 participants from Asian, black and white ethnic groups. Participants were characterised as T2D cases or controls based on the presence or absence of T2D diagnosis codes in electronic health records. T2D genetic risk was measured using a polygenic risk score (PRS), and socioeconomic deprivation was measured with the Townsend Index (TI). The variation of genetic (PRS) and socioeconomic (TI) risk factors within and between ethnic groups was calculated using analysis of variance. Multivariable logistic regression was used to associate PRS and TI with T2D cases, and mediation analysis was used to analyse the effect of PRS and TI on T2D ethnic group disparities. T2D prevalence differs for Asian 23.34% (OR=5.14, CI=4.68 to 5.65), black 16.64% (OR=3.81, CI=3.44 to 4.22) and white 7.35% (reference) ethnic groups in the UK. Both genetic and socioenvironmental T2D risk factors show greater within (w) than between (b) ethnic group variation: PRS w=64.60%, b=35.40%; TI w=71.18%, b=28.19%. Nevertheless, both genetic risk (PRS OR=1.96, CI=1.87 to 2.07) and socioeconomic deprivation (TI OR=1.09, CI=1.08 to 1.10) are associated with T2D individual risk and mediate T2D ethnic disparities (Asian PRS=22.5%, TI=9.8%; black PRS=32.0%, TI=25.3%). A relative excess of within-group versus between-group variation does not preclude T2D risk factors from contributing to T2D ethnic disparities. Our results support an integrative approach to health disparities research that includes both genetic and socioenvironmental risk factors.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38239263
doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000655
pmc: PMC10795613
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Sonali Gupta (S)

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

I King Jordan (IK)

School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Leonardo Mariño-Ramírez (L)

National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland, USA.

Classifications MeSH