Health Care Simulation in Person and at a Distance: A Systematic Review.


Journal

Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare
ISSN: 1559-713X
Titre abrégé: Simul Healthc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101264408

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 19 1 2024
pubmed: 19 1 2024
entrez: 19 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Distance simulation is a method of health care training in which the learners and facilitators are in different physical locations. Although methods of distance simulation have existed in health care for decades, this approach to education became much more prevalent during the COVID-19 pandemic. This systematic review studies a subset of distance simulation that includes combined in-person and distance simulation elements, identified here as "mixed- distance simulation." A review of the distance simulation literature identified 10,929 articles. Screened by inclusion and exclusion criteria, 34 articles were ultimately included in this review. The findings of this review present positive and negative aspects of mixed-distance simulation formats, a description of the most frequent configurations related to delivery, terminology challenges, as well as future directions including the need for faculty development, methodological rigor, and reporting details.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38240620
doi: 10.1097/SIH.0000000000000763
pii: 01266021-202401001-00008
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

S65-S74

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 Society for Simulation in Healthcare.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Références

denotes studies included in analysis
Foronda CL, Fernandez-Burgos M, Nadeau C, Kelley CN, Henry MN. Virtual simulation in nursing education: a systematic review spanning 1996 to 2018. Simul Healthc 2020;15(1):46–54.
McGrath JL, Taekman JM, Dev P, et al. Using virtual reality simulation environments to assess competence for emergency medicine learners. Acad Emerg Med 2018;25(2):186–195.
Quaranto BR, Lamb M, Traversone J, et al. Development of an interactive remote basic surgical skills mini-curriculum for medical students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Surg Innov 2021;28(2):220–225.
Wayne DB, Green M, Neilson EG. Medical education in the time of COVID-19. Sci Adv 2020;6(31):eabc7110.
Hayden EM, Khatri A, Kelly HR, Yager PH, Salazar GM. Mannequin-based telesimulation: increasing access to simulation-based education. Acad Emerg Med 2018;25(2):144–147.
Vora S, Li J, Kou M, et al. ACEP SimBox: a pediatric simulation-based training innovation. Ann Emerg Med 2021;78(3):346–354.
Sanseau E, Lavoie M, Tay K-Y, et al. TeleSimBox: a perceived effective alternative for experiential learning for medical student education with social distancing requirements. AEM Educ Train 2021;5(2):e10590.
*Mikrogianakis A, Kam A, Silver S, et al. Telesimulation: an innovative and effective tool for teaching novel intraosseous insertion techniques in developing countries. Acad Emerg Med 2011;18(4):420–427.
Brown KM, Swoboda SM, Gilbert GE, Horvath C, Sullivan N. Integrating virtual simulation into nursing education: a roadmap. Clin Simul Nurs 2022;72:21–29.
Page MJ, JE McKenzie, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:71.
Elkin R, Ramachandra G, Duff J, Palaganas JC, Stapleton S, Gross I. Distance simulation in the health professions: a scoping review. Adv Simul 2023;8:27.
Kirkpatrick D. The Four Levels of Evaluation: Measurement and Evaluation. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training & Development; 2007.
CASP. CASP checklist 2021. Available at: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Long HA, French DP, Brooks JM. Optimising the value of the critical appraisal skills programme (CASP) tool for quality appraisal in qualitative evidence synthesis. Research Methods in Medicine & Health Sciences 2020;1(1):31–42.
NIH. Quality assessment tools. Available at: https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed January 14, 2021.
Cheng A, Kessler D, Mackinnon R, et al. Reporting guidelines for health care simulation research: extensions to the CONSORT and STROBE statements. Adv Simul (Lond) 2016;1:25.
Palaganas JC, Brunette V, Winslow B. Prelicensure simulation-enhanced interprofessional education: a critical review of the research literature. Simul Healthc 2016;11(6):404–418.
Issenberg SB, Ringsted C, Østergaard D, Dieckmann P. Setting a research agenda for simulation-based healthcare education: a synthesis of the outcome from an Utstein style meeting. Simul Healthc 2011;6(3):155–167.
Dieckmann P, Phero JC, Issenberg SB, Kardong-Edgren S, Ostergaard D, Ringsted C. The first research consensus summit of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare: conduction and a synthesis of the results. Simul Healthc 2011;6(Suppl):S1–S9.
Kirkpatrick AJ PJ, Ahmed R, Bajwa M, Kutzin J, Kou M, Walsh B, Clapper T, Calhoun A, Eller S DJ, Adler M, Lopez C, Riggall V, Bajaj K, Elkin R, Kardong-Edgren S, Sanko J, Sanseau E, Good GTA, Ramachandra G, Gross IT: 2021 Healthcare Distance Simulation Summit proceedings - looking into the distance: paving the way toward a sustainable future THDS 2022.
Treloar D, Hawayek J, Montgomery JR, Russell W; Medical Readiness Trainer Team. On-site and distance education of emergency medicine personnel with a human patient simulator. Mil Med 2001;166(11):1003–1006.
*Von Lubitz DKJE, Carrasco B, Gabbrielli F, et al. Transatlantic medical education: preliminary data on distance-based high-fidelity human patient simulation training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2003;94:379–385.
*Altieri MS, Carmichael H, Jones E, Robinson T, Pryor A, Madani A. Educational value of telementoring for a simulation-based fundamental use of surgical energy (FUSE) curriculum: a randomized controlled trial in surgical trainees. Surg Endosc 2020;34(8):3650–3655.
*Autry AM, Knight S, Lester F, et al. Teaching surgical skills using video internet communication in a resource-limited setting. Obstet Gynecol 2013;122(1):127–131.
*Baron E, Sittig M, Kotov M, Fomintsev I, Gushchin V. Educational collaboration between Russian-born US physicians and Russian oncology trainees in evidence-based medicine: the higher school of oncology. JCO Glob Oncol 2021;7:353–360.
*Christensen MD, Rieger K, Tan S, Dieckmann P, Østergaard D, Watterson LM. Remotely versus locally facilitated simulation-based training in management of the deteriorating patient by newly graduated health professionals: a controlled trial. Simul Healthc 2015;10(6):352–359.
*Christensen MD, Oestergaard D, Dieckmann P, Watterson L. Learners’ perceptions during simulation-based training: an interview study comparing remote versus locally facilitated simulation-based training. Simul Healthc 2018;13(5):306–315.
*Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G. Telesimulation: an effective method for teaching the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery in resource-restricted countries. Surg Endosc 2010;24(2):417–422.
*Padhya D, Tripathi S, Kashyap R, et al. Training of pediatric critical care providers in developing countries in evidence based medicine utilizing remote simulation sessions. Glob Pediatr Health 2021;8:2333794X211007473.
*Pennington KM, Dong Y, Coville HH, Wang B, Gajic O, Kelm DJ. Evaluation of TEAM dynamics before and after remote simulation training utilizing CERTAIN platform. Med Educ Online 2018;23(1):1485431.
*Taekman JM, Foureman MF, Bulamba F, et al. A novel multiplayer screen-based simulation experience for African learners improved confidence in management of postpartum hemorrhage. Front Public Health 2017;5:248.
*Von Lubitz DKJE, Carrasco B, Fausone C-A, et al. Bioterrorism: development of large-scale medical readiness using multipoint distance-based simulation training. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004;98:221–227.
*Auerbach M, Patterson M, Mills WA, Katznelson J. The implementation of a collaborative pediatric telesimulation intervention in rural critical access hospitals. AEM Educ Train 2021;5(3):e10558.
*Danesh V, Rolin D, Hudson SV, White S. Telehealth in mental health nursing education: health care simulation with remote presence technology. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2019;57(7):23–28.
*Moote R, Claiborne M, Galoway A. Interprofessional education telephone simulation for campus-based pharmacy students and distance-learning family nurse practitioner students. Curr Pharm Teach Learn 2019;11(3):264–269.
*Packard K, Iverson L, Ryan-Haddad A, Teply R, Wize A, Qi Y. A synchronous interprofessional patient safety simulation integrating distance health professions students. J Nurs Educ 2019;58(10):577–582.
*Boggs K, Goodwin T, Simpson J. Disaster training following COVID-19 for pediatric medical residents: demand and format. Disaster Med Public Health Prep 2021;1–4.
*Lin L, Ni S, Cheng J, et al. Effect of synchronous online vs. face-to-face cardiopulmonary resuscitation training on chest compression quality: a pilot randomized manikin study. Am J Emerg Med 2021;50:80–84.
Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cognit Sci 1988;12(2):257–285.
Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1991.
Garrison DR, Anderson T, Archer W. Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Edu 1999;2(2–3):87–105.
Albertson LA. Review essay: trying to eat an elephant. Communication Research 1980;7(3):387–400.
Guthrie JT, Wigfield A, You W. Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In: Christenson S, Reschly A, Wylie C, eds. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Boston, MA: Springer Science; 2012:601–634.
Marangunić N, Granić A. Technology acceptance model: a literature review from 1986 to 2013. Univ Access Inf Soc 2015;14(1):81–95.
Eppich W, Cheng A. Promoting excellence and reflective learning in simulation (PEARLS): development and rationale for a blended approach to health care simulation debriefing. Simul Healthc 2015;10(2):106–115.
*Mulcare M, Naik N, Greenwald P, et al. Advanced communication and examination skills in telemedicine: a structured simulation-based course for medical students. MedEdPORTAL 2020;16:11047.
Chang TP, Elkin R, Boyle TP, et al. Characterizing preferred terms for geographically distant simulations: distance, remote and telesimulation. Int J Healthc Simul 2022;1(3):55–65.
Duff J, Kardong-Edgren S, Chang TP, et al. Closing the gap: a call for a common blueprint for remote distance telesimulation. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 2021;7(4):185–187.
Palaganas JC. Exploring healthcare simulation as a platform for interprofessional education. Loma Linda University Electronic Theses, Dissertations & Projects 2012;91. Available at: https://scholarsrepository.llu.edu/etd/91. Accessed October 14, 2023.
Shneider AM. Four stages of a scientific discipline; four types of scientist. Trends Biochem Sci 2009;34(5):217–223.
Bajwa M, Ahmed R, Lababidi H, et al. Development of distance simulation educator guidelines in healthcare: a delphi method application. Simul Healthc 2023; Publish ahead of print.
Gross IT, Clapper TC, Ramachandra G, et al. Setting an agenda: results of a consensus process on research directions in distance simulation. Simul Healthc 2023;18(2):100–107.
Mosher CJ, Morton A, Palaganas JC. Perspectives of engagement in distance debriefings. Adv Simul 2021;6(1):40.
Society for Simulation in Healthcare. Certified healthcare simulation educator examination blueprint. 2018. Available at: https://www.ssih.org/Certification/CHSE/Exam-Information. Accessed October 14, 2023.
Palaganas JC, Chan AKM, Leighton K. Cultural considerations in debriefing. Simul Healthc 2021;16(6):407–413.
Society for Simulation in Healthcare. 2023 IMSH Research Summit. Orlando, FL: International Meeting on Simulation for Healthcare; 2023.
INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: simulations & simulation design. Clin Simul Nurs 2016;12(Supplement):S5–S12.
Kelly MA, Hager P, Gallagher R. What matters most? Students' rankings of simulation components that contribute to clinical judgment. J Nurs Educ 2014;53(2):97–101.
Buléon C, Caton J, Park YS, et al. The state of distance healthcare simulation during the COVID-19 pandemic: results of an international survey. Adv Simul (Lond) 2022;7(1):10.
Charnetski M, Wawersik D, Palaganas J, et al. Understanding the effects of healthcare distance simulation: a systematic review. Simul Healthc 2023.
Stapleton S, Brown K, Wawersik D, et al. Does distance matter? A comparative study across distance, mixed-distance, and in-person simulation literature. Simul Healthc SSH 2023 Research Summit Special Issue (in review).
*Brei BK, Neches S, Gray MM, et al. Telehealth training during the COVID-19 pandemic: a feasibility study of large group multiplatform telesimulation training. Telemed J E Health 2021;27(10):1166–1173.
*Burckett-St Laurent DA, Cunningham MS, Abbas S, Chan VW, Okrainec A, Niazi AU. Teaching ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia remotely: a feasibility study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2016;60(7):995–1002.
*Molloy M, Shaw RJ, Vaughn J, Hueckel R. An innovative use of telepresence robots for educating healthcare professional. Stud Health Technol Inform 2016;225:989–990.
*Rudolph A, Vaughn J, Crego N, et al. Integrating telepresence robots into nursing simulation. Nurse Educ 2017;42(2):E1–e4.
*Drake AE, Hy J, MacDougall GA, et al. Innovations with tele-ultrasound in education sonography: the use of tele-ultrasound to train novice scanners. Ultrasound J 2021;13(1):6.
*Sampsel D, Vermeersch P, Doarn CR. Utility and effectiveness of a remote telepresence robotic system in nursing education in a simulated care environment. Telemed J E Health 2014;20(11):1015–1020.
*Ikeyama T, Shimizu N, Ohta K. Low-cost and ready-to-go remote-facilitated simulation-based learning. Simul Healthc 2012;7(1):35–39.
*Ohta S, Kuzuoka H, Noda M, et al. Remote support for emergency medicine using a remote-control laser pointer. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12(1):44–48.
*Carman M, Xu S, Rushton S, et al. Use of a virtual learning platform for distance-based simulation in an acute care nurse practitioner curriculum. Dimens Crit Care Nurs 2017;36(5):284–289.
*Tilton KJ, Tiffany J, Hoglund BA. Non-acute-care virtual simulation: preparing students to provide chronic illness care. Nurs Educ Perspect 2015;36(6):394–395.
Seibert DC, Guthrie JT, Adamo G. Improving learning outcomes: integration of standardized patients & telemedicine technology. Nurs Educ Perspect 2004;25(5):232–237.
*Boedeker BH, Bernhagen MA, Miller DJ, Miljkovic N, Kuper GM, Murray WB. Field use of the STORZ C-MAC video laryngoscope in intubation training with the Nebraska National air Guard. Stud Health Technol Inform 2011;163:80–82.
*Guzic BL, McIlhenny CV, Knee DR, et al. Distance learning and clinical simulation in senior baccalaureate nursing education. Clin Simul Nurs 2012;8(9):e459–e467.
*Thelen MA. The impact of online synchronous simulated clinical immersions on nursing students’ pharmacology self-efficacy: a pre-test post-test intervention pilot study. Nurse Educ Today 2021;100:104833.

Auteurs

Nuha Birido (N)

From the Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland-Medical University of Bahrain (N.B., B.N.), Busaiteen, Bahrain; Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing (K.M.B.), Baltimore, MD; Norfolk and Norwich University (D.O.-F.), Norfolk, UK; University of South Florida (S.K.T.B.), Tampa, FL; Nova Southeastern University (D.W.), Fort Lauderdale, FL; Dartmouth Health (M.C.), Lebanon, NH; The Mount Sinai Hospital (J.M.K.). New York, NY; Yale University School of Medicine (I.T.G.), New Haven, CT; and MGH Institute of Health Professions (J.C.P.), Boston, MA.

Classifications MeSH