Reversal of propofol-induced depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response by BK-channel blocker ENA-001: a randomized controlled trial.


Journal

Anesthesiology
ISSN: 1528-1175
Titre abrégé: Anesthesiology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 1300217

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 19 1 2024
pubmed: 19 1 2024
entrez: 19 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The use of anesthetics may result in depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Since there are no receptor-specific antagonists for most anesthetics, there is the need for agnostic respiratory stimulants, that increase respiratory drive irrespective of its cause. We tested whether ENA-001, an agnostic respiratory stimulant that blocks carotid body BK-channels, could restore the hypoxic ventilatory response during propofol infusion. We hypothesize that ENA-001 is able to fully restore the hypoxic ventilatory response. In this randomized double-blind cross-over trial, 14 male and female healthy volunteers were randomized to receive placebo, low and high dose ENA-001 on three separate occasions. On each occasion, isohypercapnic hypoxic ventilatory responses were measured during a fixed sequence of placebo, followed by low- and high-dose propofol infusion. We conducted a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis that included oxygen and carbon dioxide kinetics. Twelve subjects completed the three sessions; no serious adverse events occurred. The propofol concentrations were 0.6 and 2.0 µg/mL at low- and high-dose, respectively. The ENA-001 concentrations were 0.6 and 1.0 µg/mL at low- and high-dose, respectively. The propofol concentration that reduced the hypoxic ventilatory response by 50% was 1.47±0.20 µg/mL. The steady-state ENA-001 concentration to increase the depressed ventilatory response by 50% was 0.51±0.04 µg/mL. A concentration of 1 µg/mL ENA-001 was required for full reversal of the propofol effect at its C50. In this pilot study, we demonstrated that ENA-001 restored the hypoxic ventilatory response impaired by propofol. This finding is not only of clinical importance, but also provides mechanistic insights into the peripheral stimulation of breathing with ENA-001 overcoming central depression by propofol.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The use of anesthetics may result in depression of the hypoxic ventilatory response. Since there are no receptor-specific antagonists for most anesthetics, there is the need for agnostic respiratory stimulants, that increase respiratory drive irrespective of its cause. We tested whether ENA-001, an agnostic respiratory stimulant that blocks carotid body BK-channels, could restore the hypoxic ventilatory response during propofol infusion. We hypothesize that ENA-001 is able to fully restore the hypoxic ventilatory response.
METHODS METHODS
In this randomized double-blind cross-over trial, 14 male and female healthy volunteers were randomized to receive placebo, low and high dose ENA-001 on three separate occasions. On each occasion, isohypercapnic hypoxic ventilatory responses were measured during a fixed sequence of placebo, followed by low- and high-dose propofol infusion. We conducted a population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis that included oxygen and carbon dioxide kinetics.
RESULTS RESULTS
Twelve subjects completed the three sessions; no serious adverse events occurred. The propofol concentrations were 0.6 and 2.0 µg/mL at low- and high-dose, respectively. The ENA-001 concentrations were 0.6 and 1.0 µg/mL at low- and high-dose, respectively. The propofol concentration that reduced the hypoxic ventilatory response by 50% was 1.47±0.20 µg/mL. The steady-state ENA-001 concentration to increase the depressed ventilatory response by 50% was 0.51±0.04 µg/mL. A concentration of 1 µg/mL ENA-001 was required for full reversal of the propofol effect at its C50.
DISCUSSION CONCLUSIONS
In this pilot study, we demonstrated that ENA-001 restored the hypoxic ventilatory response impaired by propofol. This finding is not only of clinical importance, but also provides mechanistic insights into the peripheral stimulation of breathing with ENA-001 overcoming central depression by propofol.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38241294
pii: 139693
doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004915
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Society of Anesthesiologists.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Conflicts: In the last 36 months, AD received consultancy fees from Enalare Therapeutics Inc. (USA), Trevena Inc. (USA), and awards/grants from the US Food and Drug Administration and from the Dutch Research Council (NWO, the Hague, the Netherlands) in the framework of the NWA-ORC Call for research project TAPTOE, Tackling and preventing the opioid epidemic (NWA.1160.18.300). JVP and TM are employees of Enalare, Therapeutics Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.

Auteurs

Simone C Jansen (SC)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Maarten van Lemmen (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Erik Olofsen (E)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Laurence Moss (L)

Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Joseph V Pergolizzi (JV)

Enalare Therapeutics Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
NEMA Research Inc., Naples, Florida, USA.

Thomas Miller (T)

Enalare Therapeutics Inc., Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
Department of Pediatrics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Robert D Colucci (RD)

NEMA Research Inc., Naples, Florida, USA.
Colucci & Associates, LLC, Newton, Connecticut, USA.

Monique van Velzen (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Philip Kremer (P)

Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Albert Dahan (A)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
PainLess Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Rutger van der Schrier (R)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Marieke Niesters (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
PainLess Foundation, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Classifications MeSH