Unhealthy air quality secondary to wildfires is associated with lower blastocyst yield.

IVF Pollution embryo fertility wildfire

Journal

Fertility and sterility
ISSN: 1556-5653
Titre abrégé: Fertil Steril
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0372772

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 22 08 2023
revised: 19 12 2023
accepted: 20 12 2023
medline: 20 1 2024
pubmed: 20 1 2024
entrez: 20 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

To study the impact of unhealthy air quality from the 2020 Oregon wildfires on outcomes for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. A retrospective cohort study. A university-based fertility clinic. Subjects were undergoing IVF treatment from the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through a 10-day exposure period. Cohorts were classified on the basis of whether subjects experienced patient and/or laboratory exposure to unhealthy air quality. Patient exposure was defined as at least 4 days of ovarian stimulation overlapping with the exposure, and laboratory exposure was defined as at least 2 days of IVF treatment and embryogenesis overlapping with the exposure. The unexposed cohort consisted of remaining subjects without defined exposure, with cycles in the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires. As some subjects had dual exposure and appeared in both patient and laboratory exposure cohorts, each cohort was separately compared with the unexposed control cohort. A 10-day period of unhealthy air quality caused by smoke plumes from a wildfire event. The primary outcome was the blastulation rate. Secondary outcomes included fertilization rate, number of blastocysts obtained, and cycles with no blastocysts frozen or transferred. Sixty-nine subjects underwent ovarian stimulation and IVF treatment during the 6 weeks preceding the wildfires through the 10-day period of unhealthy air quality. Of these, 15 patients were in the laboratory exposure cohort, 16 were in the patient exposure cohort, and 44 were unexposed. Six subjects appeared in both laboratory and patient exposure cohorts. Although neither exposure cohort had significantly decreased blastulation rate compared with the unexposed, the median number of blastocysts obtained was significantly lower in the laboratory exposure cohort than the unexposed group (2 [range 0-14] vs. 4.5 [range 0-21], respectively). The laboratory exposure cohort had significantly more cycles with no blastocysts obtained (3/15 [20%] vs. 1/44 [2%]). There were no significant differences in IVF treatment outcomes between patient exposure and unexposed cohorts. These findings persisted after controlling for age. There were no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes observed after embryo transfer between the exposure group and the unexposed group. For a cohort of patients undergoing IVF treatment, an acute episode of outside wildfire smoke exposure during fertilization and embryogenesis was associated with decreased blastocyst yield.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38244020
pii: S0015-0282(23)02097-6
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2023.12.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests M.K. has nothing to disclose. E.R. has nothing to disclose. P.P. has nothing to disclose. B.G. has nothing to disclose. T.O. has nothing to disclose. S.P. has nothing to disclose. R.M. has nothing to disclose. M.B. has nothing to disclose. P.A. has nothing to disclose. D.L. has nothing to disclose. D.W. has nothing to disclose. S.K. has nothing to disclose.

Auteurs

Molly Kornfield (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon. Electronic address: siegelmo@ohsu.edu.

Elizabeth Rubin (E)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Pamela Parker (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Bharti Garg (B)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Thomas O'Leary (T)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Sara Phillips (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Rachel Madding (R)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Maureen Baldwin (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Paula Amato (P)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

David Lee (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Diana Wu (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Sacha Krieg (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.

Classifications MeSH