Confirmation bias emerges from an approximation to Bayesian reasoning.

Bayesian Bounded rationality Cognitive model Confirmation bias Information processing Source reliability

Journal

Cognition
ISSN: 1873-7838
Titre abrégé: Cognition
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 0367541

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 25 04 2023
revised: 30 10 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 21 1 2024
pubmed: 21 1 2024
entrez: 20 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Confirmation bias is defined as searching for and assimilating information in a way that favours existing beliefs. We show that confirmation bias emerges as a natural consequence of boundedly rational belief updating by presenting the BIASR model (Bayesian updating with an Independence Approximation and Source Reliability). In this model, an individual's beliefs about a hypothesis and the source reliability form a Bayesian network. Upon receiving information, an individual simultaneously updates beliefs about the hypothesis in question and the reliability of the information source. If the individual updates rationally then this introduces numerous dependencies between beliefs, the tracking of which represents an unrealistic demand on memory. We propose that human cognition overcomes this memory limitation by assuming independence between beliefs, evidence for which is provided in prior research. We show how a Bayesian belief updating model incorporating this independence approximation generates many types of confirmation bias, including biased evaluation, biased assimilation, attitude polarisation, belief perseverance and confirmation bias in the selection of sources.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38244398
pii: S0010-0277(23)00327-X
doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2023.105693
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

105693

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Charlie Pilgrim (C)

The Mathematics of Real-World Systems CDT, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK; Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, WC1H 0DS, UK. Electronic address: c.pilgrim@ucl.ac.uk.

Adam Sanborn (A)

Psychology, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Eugene Malthouse (E)

Psychology, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Thomas T Hills (TT)

Psychology, The University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK; The Alan Turing Institute, The British Library, 96 Euston Road, London, NW1 2DB, UK.

Classifications MeSH