Efficacy and safety of an early oral switch in low-risk Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SABATO): an international, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial.

BACKGROUND

Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection is treated with at least 14 days of intravenous antimicrobials. We assessed the efficacy and safety of an early switch to oral therapy in patients at low risk for complications related to S aureus bloodstream infection.

METHODS

In this international, open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trial done in 31 tertiary care hospitals in Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Spain, adult patients with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection were randomly assigned after 5-7 days of intravenous antimicrobial therapy to oral antimicrobial therapy or to continue intravenous standard therapy. Randomisation was done via a central web-based system, using permuted blocks of varying length, and stratified by study centre. The main exclusion criteria were signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection, non-removable foreign devices, and severe comorbidity. The composite primary endpoint was the occurrence of any complication related to S aureus bloodstream infection (relapsing S aureus bloodstream infection, deep-seated infection, and mortality attributable to infection) within 90 days, assessed in the intention-to-treat population by clinical assessors who were masked to treatment assignment. Adverse events were assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of study medication (safety population). Due to slow recruitment, the scientific advisory committee decided on Jan 15, 2018, to stop the trial after 215 participants were randomly assigned (planned sample size was 430 participants) and to convert the planned interim analysis into the final analysis. The decision was taken without knowledge of outcome data, at a time when 126 participants were enrolled. The new sample size accommodated a non-inferiority margin of 10%; to claim non-inferiority, the upper bound of the 95% CI for the treatment difference (stratified by centre) had to be below 10 percentage points. The trial is closed to recruitment and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01792804), the German Clinical trials register (DRKS00004741), and EudraCT (2013-000577-77).

FINDINGS

Of 5063 patients with S aureus bloodstream infection assessed for eligibility, 213 were randomly assigned to switch to oral therapy (n=108) or to continue intravenous therapy (n=105). Mean age was 63·5 (SD 17·2) years and 148 (69%) participants were male and 65 (31%) were female. In the oral switch group, 14 (13%) participants met the primary endpoint versus 13 (12%) in the intravenous group, with a treatment difference of 0·7 percentage points (95% CI -7·8 to 9·1; p=0·013). In the oral switch group, 36 (34%) of 107 participants in the safety population had at least one serious adverse event compared with 27 (26%) of 103 participants in the intravenous group (p=0·29).

INTERPRETATION

Oral switch antimicrobial therapy was non-inferior to intravenous standard therapy in participants with low-risk S aureus bloodstream infection. However, it is necessary to carefully assess patients for signs and symptoms of complicated S aureus bloodstream infection at the time of presentation and thereafter before considering early oral switch therapy.

FUNDING

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft.

TRANSLATIONS

For the German, Spanish, French and Dutch translations of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of interests AJK received funding for this study from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and is Chairperson of the German Sepsis Society. HSe received grants or research support from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) Germany and the German Center for Infection Research, and has been a consultant for Debiopharm, Gilead, MSD, and Shionogi. AS has received grants from Gilead Sciences (IN-ES-540–6089) and Pfizer, consulting fees and lecture honoraria from Pfizer, MSD, Angelini, Shionogi, Gilead, and Menarini, and travel support from Pfizer. JR-B has received grants or research support from the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI RD16/0016/00001) and Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Infecciosas (CIBERINFEC, CB21/13/00012), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation, which are co-financed by the European Development Regional Fund. SH received honoraria and travel support from Shionogi, Pfizer, Infectopharm, and AdvanzPharma. NJ reports receiving honoraria for lectures from AbbVie, Bayer, Infectopharm, and Medacta, travel support from Gilead, Pfizer, and Correvio, participation in paid advisory board meetings for MSD, and membership in the steering committee of the German Society of Internal Medicine. SRi received honoraria for lectures from Falk Foundation, Pfizer, bioMérieux, Akademie für Infektionsmedizin, Med Update, streamedup!, and Deutscher Apotheker-Verlag. TW reports receiving honoraria for presentations from AstraZeneca, Advanz, MSD, Pfizer, and Shionogi, grants or research support from BMBF Germany, and travel support from Pfizer. All other authors declare no competing interests.