TROPHY-U-01, a phase II open-label study of sacituzumab govitecan in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy and checkpoint inhibitors: updated safety and efficacy outcomes.

(up to 6): antibody-drug conjugate SN-38 metastatic urothelial carcinoma sacituzumab govitecan topoisomerase I inhibitor

Journal

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
18 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 28 09 2023
revised: 02 01 2024
accepted: 04 01 2024
medline: 21 1 2024
pubmed: 21 1 2024
entrez: 20 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US FDA approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), based on Cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear. TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and CPI-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up. Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2-37.6). Median PFS and OS were 5.4 (95% CI 3.5-6.9) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (*1|*1) in 40%, heterozygous (*1|*28) in 42%, homozygous (*28|*28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with *1|*1, *1|*28, and *28|*28 genotypes, any grade TRAEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status. With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate containing cytotoxic SN-38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. SG received accelerated US FDA approval for locally advanced (LA) or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI), based on Cohort 1 of the TROPHY-U-01 study. Mutations in the uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase 1A1 (UGT1A1) gene are associated with increased adverse events (AEs) with irinotecan-based therapies. Whether UGT1A1 status could impact SG toxicity and efficacy remains unclear.
PATIENTS AND METHODS METHODS
TROPHY-U-01 (NCT03547973) is a multicohort, open-label, phase II registrational study. Cohort 1 includes patients with LA or mUC who progressed after platinum- and CPI-based therapies. SG was administered at 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) per central review; secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Post hoc safety analyses were exploratory with descriptive statistics. Updated analyses include longer follow-up.
RESULTS RESULTS
Cohort 1 included 113 patients. At a median follow-up of 10.5 months, ORR was 28% (95% CI 20.2-37.6). Median PFS and OS were 5.4 (95% CI 3.5-6.9) and 10.9 months (95% CI 8.9-13.8), respectively. Occurrence of grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs (TRAEs) and treatment-related discontinuation were consistent with prior reports. UGT1A1 status was wildtype (*1|*1) in 40%, heterozygous (*1|*28) in 42%, homozygous (*28|*28) in 12%, and missing in 6% of patients. In patients with *1|*1, *1|*28, and *28|*28 genotypes, any grade TRAEs occurred in 93%, 94%, and 100% of patients, respectively, and were managed similarly regardless of UGT1A1 status.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
With longer follow-up, the ORR remains high in patients with heavily pretreated LA or mUC. Safety data were consistent with the known SG toxicity profile. AE incidence varied across UGT1A1 subgroups; however, discontinuation rates remained relatively low for all groups.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38244927
pii: S0923-7534(24)00009-7
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2024.01.002
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Auteurs

Y Loriot (Y)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: Yohann.LORIOT@gustaveroussy.fr.

D P Petrylak (DP)

Genitourinary Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.

A Rezazadeh Kalebasty (AR)

School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.

A Fléchon (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France.

R K Jain (RK)

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA.

S Gupta (S)

Division of Oncology, Department of Medicine, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

M Bupathi (M)

Medical Oncology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Littleton, CO, USA.

P Beuzeboc (P)

Oncology and Supportive Care Department, Hôpital Foch, Suresnes, France.

P Palmbos (P)

Urologic Oncology Clinic, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

A V Balar (AV)

Genitourinary Oncology Department, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.

C E Kyriakopoulos (CE)

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

D Pouessel (D)

Department of Medical Oncology and Clinical Research Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud/Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse (IUCT-Oncopôle), Toulouse, France.

C N Sternberg (CN)

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

J Tonelli (J)

Clinical Development - Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Parsippany, NJ, USA.

M Sierecki (M)

Clinical Development - Oncology, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.

H Zhou (H)

Department of Biometrics, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Foster City, CA, USA.

P Grivas (P)

Department of Medicine, University of Washington; Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.

P Barthélémy (P)

Medical Oncology Department, Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.

S T Tagawa (ST)

Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA.

Classifications MeSH