Access to cancer clinical trials for racialised older adults: an equity-focused rapid scoping review protocol.

GERIATRIC MEDICINE Health Equity ONCOLOGY

Journal

BMJ open
ISSN: 2044-6055
Titre abrégé: BMJ Open
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101552874

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
medline: 21 1 2024
pubmed: 21 1 2024
entrez: 20 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The intersection of race and older age compounds existing health disparities experienced by historically marginalised communities. Therefore, racialised older adults with cancer are more disadvantaged in their access to cancer clinical trials compared with age-matched counterparts. To determine what has already been published in this area, the rapid scoping review question are: what are the barriers, facilitators and potential solutions for enhancing access to cancer clinical trials among racialised older adults? We will use a rapid scoping review methodology in which we follow the six-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley, including a systematic search of the literature with abstract and full-text screening to be conducted by two independent reviewers, data abstraction by one reviewer and verification by a second reviewer using an Excel data abstraction sheet. Articles focusing on persons aged 18 and over who identify as a racialised person with cancer, that describe therapies/therapeutic interventions/prevention/outcomes related to barriers, facilitators and solutions to enhancing access to and equity in cancer clinical trials will be eligible for inclusion in this rapid scoping review. All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The intersection of race and older age compounds existing health disparities experienced by historically marginalised communities. Therefore, racialised older adults with cancer are more disadvantaged in their access to cancer clinical trials compared with age-matched counterparts. To determine what has already been published in this area, the rapid scoping review question are: what are the barriers, facilitators and potential solutions for enhancing access to cancer clinical trials among racialised older adults?
METHODS METHODS
We will use a rapid scoping review methodology in which we follow the six-step framework of Arksey and O'Malley, including a systematic search of the literature with abstract and full-text screening to be conducted by two independent reviewers, data abstraction by one reviewer and verification by a second reviewer using an Excel data abstraction sheet. Articles focusing on persons aged 18 and over who identify as a racialised person with cancer, that describe therapies/therapeutic interventions/prevention/outcomes related to barriers, facilitators and solutions to enhancing access to and equity in cancer clinical trials will be eligible for inclusion in this rapid scoping review.
ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION BACKGROUND
All data will be extracted from published literature. Hence, ethical approval and patient informed consent are not required. The findings of the scoping review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presentation at international conferences.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38245013
pii: bmjopen-2023-074191
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074191
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e074191

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: None declared.

Auteurs

Vivian Li (V)

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Shabbir M H Alibhai (SMH)

Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Faculty of Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Kenneth Noel (K)

Walnut Foundation, Brampton, Ontario, Canada.

Rouhi Fazelzad (R)

Library and Information Services, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Kristin Haase (K)

School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Caroline Mariano (C)

BC Cancer Agency Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Sara Durbano (S)

Department of Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Schroder Sattar (S)

College of Nursing, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada.

Lorelei Newton (L)

School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.

David Dawe (D)

CancerCare Manitoba Research Institute, CancerCare Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.

Jennifer A Bell (JA)

Clinical and Organizational Ethics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Tina Hsu (T)

Department of Oncology, The Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Sabrina T Wong (ST)

Division of Intramural Research, National Institute of Nursing Research, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

Aisha Lofters (A)

Peter Gilgan Centre for Women's Cancers, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Jacqueline L Bender (JL)

Department of Supportive Care, Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Dalla Lana School of Public Health and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Jackie Manthorne (J)

Canadian Cancer Survivor Network, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Martine T E Puts (MTE)

Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada martine.puts@utoronto.ca.

Classifications MeSH