Regional CZT myocardial perfusion reserve for the detection of territories with simultaneously impaired CFR and IMR in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease: a pilot study.

Microvascular dysfunction SPECT myocardial blood flow

Journal

Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology
ISSN: 1532-6551
Titre abrégé: J Nucl Cardiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9423534

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Aug 2023
Historique:
received: 01 09 2022
accepted: 06 01 2023
medline: 21 1 2024
pubmed: 21 1 2024
entrez: 20 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

To assess the diagnostic performances of CZT myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) for the detection of territories with simultaneous impaired coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease. Patients were prospectively included before being referred for coronary angiography. All patients underwent CZT MPR before invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and coronary physiology assessment. Rest and dipyridamole-induced stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and MPR were quantified using 99mTc-SestaMIBI and a CZT camera. Fractional flow reserve (FFR), Thermodilution CFR, and IMR were assessed during ICA. Between December 2016 and July 2019, 36 patients were included. 25/36 patients presented no obstructive coronary artery disease. A complete functional assessment was performed in 32 arteries. No territory presented a significant ischemia on CZT myocardial perfusion imaging. A moderate yet significant correlation was observed between regional CZT MPR and CFR (r = 0.4, P = .03). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy of regional CZT MPR versus the composite invasive criterion (impaired CFR and IMR) were 87 [47% to 99%], 92% [73% to 99%], 78% [47% to 93%], 96% [78% to 99%], and 91% [75% to 98%], respectively. All territories with a regional CZT MPR ≤ 1.8 showed a CFR < 2. Regional CZT MPR values were significantly higher in arteries with CFR ≥ 2 and IMR < 25 (negative composite criterion, n = 14) than in those with CFR < 2 and IMR ≥ 25 (2.6 [2.1 to 3.6] versus 1.6 [1.2 to 1.8]), P < .01). Regional CZT MPR presented excellent diagnostic performances for the detection of territories with simultaneously impaired CFR and IMR reflecting a very high cardiovascular risk in patients without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38245296
pii: S1071-3581(24)00066-7
doi: 10.1007/s12350-023-03206-6
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1656-1667

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023 American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Published by ELSEVIER INC. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Loïc Djaïleb (L)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France. Electronic address: LDjaileb@chu-grenoble.fr.

Nicolas De Leiris (N)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Marjorie Canu (M)

Cardiology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Olivier Phan Sy (OP)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Alexandre Seiller (A)

Clinical Investigation Center-Technological Innovation, INSERM CIC1406, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Julien Leenhardt (J)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Clémence Charlon (C)

Cardiology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Marine Faure (M)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Jessica Caillard (J)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Alexis Broisat (A)

INSERM, LRB, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Anne-Laure Borel (AL)

Endocrinology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Sandrine Lablanche (S)

Endocrinology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Cécile Betry (C)

Endocrinology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Catherine Ghezzi (C)

INSERM, LRB, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Gérald Vanzetto (G)

Cardiology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Daniel Fagret (D)

Nuclear Medicine Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Laurent M Riou (LM)

INSERM, LRB, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Gilles Barone-Rochette (G)

Cardiology Department, LRB, INSERM, CHU Grenoble Alpes, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, 38000, Grenoble, France.

Classifications MeSH