Lower Rate of Major Bleeding in Very High-Risk Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: A Propensity-Matched Comparison with Direct Oral Anticoagulation.
Watchman
atrial fibrillation
bleeding
left atrial appendage
oral anticoagulant
stroke prevention
Journal
Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
25
06
2023
revised:
10
01
2024
accepted:
12
01
2024
medline:
22
1
2024
pubmed:
22
1
2024
entrez:
21
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Long-term oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy for thromboembolic (TE) prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) could be a safe alternative to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with a very high thromboembolic risk profile. to compare the safety and efficacy of LAAO versus DOACs among AF patients at very high stroke risk (CHA Data from patients with a CHA Among 2381 patients, 554 very high-risk patients were included in the study (79 ± 7 years; CHA Among high-risk patients, LAAO had similar stroke prevention efficacy but a significantly lower risk of clinically-relevant bleeding when compared with DOACs. LAAO clinical benefit became significant after 18 months of follow-up.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Long-term oral anticoagulation is the mainstay therapy for thromboembolic (TE) prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) could be a safe alternative to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with a very high thromboembolic risk profile.
OBJECTIVE
OBJECTIVE
to compare the safety and efficacy of LAAO versus DOACs among AF patients at very high stroke risk (CHA
METHODS
METHODS
Data from patients with a CHA
RESULTS
RESULTS
Among 2381 patients, 554 very high-risk patients were included in the study (79 ± 7 years; CHA
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
Among high-risk patients, LAAO had similar stroke prevention efficacy but a significantly lower risk of clinically-relevant bleeding when compared with DOACs. LAAO clinical benefit became significant after 18 months of follow-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38246567
pii: S1547-5271(24)00070-5
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.01.018
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.