Comparison of the specimen quality of endobronchial ultrasound-guided intranodal forceps biopsy using standard-sized forceps versus mini forceps for lung cancer: A prospective study.

EBUS-TBNA bronchoscopy endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration intranodal forceps biopsy lung cancer lymphadenopathy

Journal

Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)
ISSN: 1440-1843
Titre abrégé: Respirology
Pays: Australia
ID NLM: 9616368

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
21 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 08 08 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 21 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a diagnostic procedure with adequate performance; however, its ability to provide specimens of sufficient quality and quantity for treatment decision-making in advanced-stage lung cancer may be limited, primarily due to blood contamination. The use of a 0.96-mm miniforceps biopsy (MFB) permits true histological sampling, but the resulting small specimens are unsuitable for the intended applications. Therefore, we introduced a 1.9-mm standard-sized forceps biopsy (SFB) and compared its utility to that of MFB. We prospectively enrolled patients from three institutions who presented with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy and suspected advanced-stage lung cancer, or those who were already diagnosed but required additional tissue specimens for biomarker analysis. Each patient underwent MFB followed by SFB three or four times through the tract created by TBNA using a 22-gauge needle on the same lymph node (LN). Two pathologists assessed the quality and size of each specimen using a virtual slide system, and diagnostic performance was compared between the MFB and SFB groups. Among the 60 enrolled patients, 70.0% were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. The most frequently targeted sites were the lower paratracheal LNs, followed by the interlobar LNs. The diagnostic yields of TBNA, MFB and SFB were 91.7%, 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively. The sampling rate of high-quality specimens was significantly higher in the SFB group. Moreover, the mean specimen size for SFB was three times larger than for MFB. SFB is useful for obtaining sufficient qualitative and quantitative specimens.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) is a diagnostic procedure with adequate performance; however, its ability to provide specimens of sufficient quality and quantity for treatment decision-making in advanced-stage lung cancer may be limited, primarily due to blood contamination. The use of a 0.96-mm miniforceps biopsy (MFB) permits true histological sampling, but the resulting small specimens are unsuitable for the intended applications. Therefore, we introduced a 1.9-mm standard-sized forceps biopsy (SFB) and compared its utility to that of MFB.
METHODS METHODS
We prospectively enrolled patients from three institutions who presented with hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy and suspected advanced-stage lung cancer, or those who were already diagnosed but required additional tissue specimens for biomarker analysis. Each patient underwent MFB followed by SFB three or four times through the tract created by TBNA using a 22-gauge needle on the same lymph node (LN). Two pathologists assessed the quality and size of each specimen using a virtual slide system, and diagnostic performance was compared between the MFB and SFB groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
Among the 60 enrolled patients, 70.0% were diagnosed with adenocarcinoma. The most frequently targeted sites were the lower paratracheal LNs, followed by the interlobar LNs. The diagnostic yields of TBNA, MFB and SFB were 91.7%, 93.3% and 96.7%, respectively. The sampling rate of high-quality specimens was significantly higher in the SFB group. Moreover, the mean specimen size for SFB was three times larger than for MFB.
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
SFB is useful for obtaining sufficient qualitative and quantitative specimens.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38246887
doi: 10.1111/resp.14659
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund
ID : 2020-A-12

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Asian Pacific Society of Respirology.

Références

Silvestri GA, Gonzalez AV, Jantz MA, Margolis ML, Gould MK, Tanoue LT, et al. Methods for staging non-small cell lung cancer: diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest. 2013;143:e211S-e250S.
Mosele F, Remon J, Mateo J, Westphalen CB, Barlesi F, Lolkema MP, et al. Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group. Ann Oncol. 2020;31:1491-1505.
Herbst RS, Soria JC, Kowanetz M, Fine GD, Hamid O, Gordon MS, et al. Predictive correlates of response to the anti-PD-L1 antibody MPDL3280A in cancer patients. Nature. 2014;515:563-567.
Wahidi MM, Herth F, Yasufuku K, Shepherd RW, Yarmus L, Chawla M, et al. Technical aspects of Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration: CHEST guideline and expert panel report. Chest. 2016;149:816-835.
Nakajima T, Yasufuku K, Takahashi R, Shingyoji M, Hirata T, Itami M, et al. Comparison of 21-gauge and 22-gauge aspiration needle during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Respirology. 2011;16:90-94.
Lim C, Sung M, Shepherd FA, Nouriany N, Sawczak M, Paul T, et al. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: are research biopsies a barrier to participation in clinical trials? J Thorac Oncol. 2016;11:79-84.
Chrissian A, Misselhorn D, Chen A. Endobronchial-ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy of mediastinal and hilar lesions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2011;92:284-288.
Radchenko CC, Cho PK, Kang L, Saettele TM. Performance of endobronchial-ultrasound guided miniforceps biopsy of targeted mediastinal and hilar lesions. Respir Med. 2019;158:92-96.
Konno-Yamamoto A, Matsumoto Y, Imabayashi T, Tanaka M, Uchimura K, Nakagomi T, et al. Feasibility of modified endobronchial ultrasound-guided Intranodal forceps biopsy: a retrospective analysis. Respiration. 2023;102:143-153.
Detterbeck FC, Boffa DJ, Kim AW, Tanoue LT. The eighth edition lung cancer stage classification. Chest. 2017;151:193-203.
Rusch VW, Asamura H, Watanabe H, Giroux DJ, Rami-Porta R, Goldstraw P, et al. The IASLC lung cancer staging project: a proposal for a new international lymph node map in the forthcoming seventh edition of the TNM classification for lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2009;4:568-577.
Konge L, Clementsen PF, Ringsted C, Minddal V, Larsen KR, Annema JT. Simulator training for endobronchial ultrasound: a randomised controlled trial. Eur Respir J. 2015;46:1140-1149.
Fujiwara T, Yasufuku K, Nakajima T, Chiyo M, Yoshida S, Suzuki M, et al. The utility of sonographic features during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for lymph node staging in patients with lung cancer: a standard endobronchial ultrasound image classification system. Chest. 2010;138:641-647.
Nakajima T, Anayama T, Shingyoji M, Kimura H, Yoshino I, Yasufuku K. Vascular image patterns of lymph nodes for the prediction of metastatic disease during EBUS-TBNA for mediastinal staging of lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:1009-1014.
Izumo T, Sasada S, Chavez C, Matsumoto Y, Tsuchida T. Endobronchial ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:956-962.
Lee HS, Lee GK, Lee HS, Kim MS, Lee JM, Kim HY, et al. Real-time endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer: how many aspirations per target lymph node station? Chest. 2008;134:368-374.
Herth FJ, Morgan RK, Eberhardt R, Ernst A. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided miniforceps biopsy in the biopsy of subcarinal masses in patients with low likelihood of non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:1874-1878.
Oki M, Saka H, Kitagawa C, Kogure Y, Murata N, Adachi T, et al. Rapid on-site cytologic evaluation during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration for diagnosing lung cancer: a randomized study. Respiration. 2013;85:486-492.
Hiroshima K, Yoshizawa A, Takenaka A, Haba R, Kawahara K, Minami Y, et al. Cytology reporting system for lung cancer from the Japan Lung Cancer Society and Japanese Society of Clinical Cytology: an interobserver reproducibility study and risk of malignancy evaluation on cytology specimens. Acta Cytol. 2020;64:452-462.
Ray AS, Li C, Murphy TE, Cai G, Araujo KLB, Bramley K, et al. Improved diagnostic yield and specimen quality with endobronchial ultrasound-guided forceps biopsies: a retrospective analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:894-901.
Bremnes RM, Donnem T, Al-Saad S, Al-Shibli K, Andersen S, Sirera R, et al. The role of tumor stroma in cancer progression and prognosis: emphasis on carcinoma-associated fibroblasts and non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:209-217.
Folch EE, Mahajan AK, Oberg CL, Maldonado F, Toloza E, Krimsky WS, et al. Standardized definitions of bleeding after Transbronchial lung biopsy: a delphi consensus statement from the Nashville Working Group. Chest. 2020;158:393-400.
Kanda Y. Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software ‘EZR’ for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013;48:452-458.
Nasu S, Okamoto N, Suzuki H, Shiroyama T, Tanaka A, Samejima Y, et al. Comparison of the utilities of cryobiopsy and forceps biopsy for peripheral lung cancer. Anticancer Res. 2019;39:5683-5688.
Murakami S, Yokose T, Nemoto D, Suzuki M, Usui R, Nakahara Y, et al. Suitability of bronchoscopic biopsy tissue samples for next-generation sequencing. Diagnostics. 2021;11:361.
Udagawa H, Kirita K, Naito T, Nomura S, Ishibashi M, Matsuzawa R, et al. Feasibility and utility of transbronchial cryobiopsy in precision medicine for lung cancer: prospective single-arm study. Cancer Sci. 2020;111:2488-2498.
Agrawal A, Ghori U, Chaddha U, Murgu S. Combined EBUS-IFB and EBUS-TBNA vs EBUS-TBNA alone for intrathoracic adenopathy: a meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2022;114:340-348.
Takeyasu Y, Yoshida T, Motoi N, Teishikata T, Tanaka M, Matsumoto Y, et al. Feasibility of next-generation sequencing (Oncomine DX Target Test) for the screening of oncogenic mutations in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2021;51:1114-1122.
Yatabe Y, Sunami K, Goto K, Nishio K, Aragane N, Ikeda S, et al. Multiplex gene-panel testing for lung cancer patients. Pathol Int. 2020;70:921-931.
Kim HR, Park HJ, Son J, Lee JG, Chung KY, Cho NH, et al. Tumor microenvironment dictates regulatory T cell phenotype: upregulated immune checkpoints reinforce suppressive function. J Immunother Cancer. 2019;7:339.
Kumagai S, Koyama S, Itahashi K, Tanegashima T, Lin YT, Togashi Y, et al. Lactic acid promotes PD-1 expression in regulatory T cells in highly glycolytic tumor microenvironments. Cancer Cell. 2022;40:201-218. e9.
Ku BM, Kim Y, Lee KY, Kim SY, Sun JM, Lee SH, et al. Tumor infiltrated immune cell types support distinct immune checkpoint inhibitor outcomes in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Eur J Immunol. 2021;51:956-964.
Zhang J, Guo JR, Huang ZS, Fu WL, Wu XL, Wu N, et al. Transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal lesions: a randomised trial. Eur Respir J. 2021;58:2100055.
Fan Y, Zhang AM, Wu XL, Huang ZS, Kontogianni K, Sun K, et al. Transbronchial needle aspiration combined with cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of mediastinal diseases: a multicentre, open-label, randomised trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11:256-264.
Tajarernmuang P, Ofiara L, Beaudoin S, Gonzalez AV. Bronchoscopic tissue yield for advanced molecular testing: are we getting enough? J Thorac Dis. 2020;12:3287-3295.
Kage H, Kohsaka S, Shinozaki-Ushiku A, Hiraishi Y, Sato J, Nagayama K, et al. Small lung tumor biopsy samples are feasible for high quality targeted next generation sequencing. Cancer Sci. 2019;110:2652-2657.
Guisier F, Salaun M, Lachkar S, Lamy A, Piton N, Obstoy B, et al. Molecular analysis of peripheral non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer sampled by radial EBUS. Respirology. 2016;21:718-726.
Bramley K, Pisani MA, Murphy TE, Araujo KL, Homer RJ, Puchalski JT. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided cautery-assisted transbronchial forceps biopsies: safety and sensitivity relative to transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:1870-1876.
Zhao JJ, Chan HP, Soon YY, Huang Y, Soo RA, Kee ACL. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the adequacy of endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration for next-generation sequencing in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer. 2022;166:17-26.
Hendry S, Byrne DJ, Christie M, Steinfort DP, Irving LB, Wagner CA, et al. Adequate tumour cellularity is essential for accurate PD-L1 immunohistochemistry assessment on cytology cell-block specimens. Cytopathology. 2020;31:90-95.

Auteurs

Toshiyuki Nakai (T)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Yuji Matsumoto (Y)

Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Takahiro Ueda (T)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Izumi City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Yuko Kuwae (Y)

Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Sayaka Tanaka (S)

Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Atsushi Miyamoto (A)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Yoshiya Matsumoto (Y)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Kenji Sawa (K)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Kanako Sato (K)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Kazuhiro Yamada (K)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Tetsuya Watanabe (T)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Kazuhisa Asai (K)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Hideaki Furuse (H)

Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Keigo Uchimura (K)

Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Tatsuya Imabayashi (T)

Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Riki Uenishi (R)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Izumi City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Mitsuru Fukui (M)

Laboratory of Statistics, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Hidenori Tanaka (H)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Izumi City General Hospital, Osaka, Japan.

Masahiko Ohsawa (M)

Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Tomoya Kawaguchi (T)

Department of Respiratory Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, Osaka, Japan.

Takaaki Tsuchida (T)

Department of Endoscopy, Respiratory Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Classifications MeSH