Evaluating Patient Preferences and Clinical Outcomes in Stress Urinary Incontinence Treatment: A Short-Term Follow-Up Study of the Transobturator Tape Procedure and Pubourethral Ligament Plication (a Minimally Invasive Technique).

SUI pubourethral ligament transobturator tape procedure

Journal

Journal of personalized medicine
ISSN: 2075-4426
Titre abrégé: J Pers Med
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101602269

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
26 Dec 2023
Historique:
received: 08 12 2023
revised: 24 12 2023
accepted: 24 12 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

This study aims to provide an in-depth analysis of patient preferences and clinical outcomes associated with two surgical techniques for treating stress urinary incontinence (SUI): the transobturator suburethral sling (TOT) procedure and the pubourethral ligament plication (PUL) procedure. We evaluated the rates of postoperative complications, the duration of each procedure, hemoglobin loss, and days of hospitalization. This prospective study included 80 patients who underwent surgery for SUI: 40 patients for the TOT procedure and 40 patients for the PUL procedure. Clinical data on patient characteristics, treatment efficacy, and post-surgical outcomes were analyzed to assess patient preferences and real-world clinical effectiveness. Regarding patient preferences, those who underwent TOT surgery were more likely to be older, had a higher average number of pregnancies, and were more often postmenopausal, in contrast to those who underwent PUL surgery ( This study highlights that while the PUL procedure achieves cure rates comparable to TOT, it offers a less invasive option with shorter operating times and no hospitalization required. These findings suggest that PUL could be a viable alternative for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment, especially in contexts where avoiding mesh use is preferred. This adds significant value to patient-centered care in SUI management, offering tailored treatment options based on patient characteristics, preferences, and risk profiles.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38248735
pii: jpm14010034
doi: 10.3390/jpm14010034
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Auteurs

Simona Brasoveanu (S)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Răzvan Ilina (R)

Department of Surgery, Discipline of Surgical Semiology II, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Ligia Balulescu (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Marilena Pirtea (M)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Cristina Secosan (C)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Dorin Grigoraș (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Flavius Olaru (F)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Dragos Erdelean (D)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Oana Balint (O)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Mădălin-Marius Margan (MM)

Department of Functional Sciences, Discipline of Public Health, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Cristiana-Smaranda Ivan (CS)

General Medicine, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Laurențiu Pirtea (L)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babes University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.

Classifications MeSH