Advances in objective assessment of ergonomics in endoscopic surgery: a review.

endoscopic surgery ergonomics occupational health review surgeon

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 22 08 2023
accepted: 04 12 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Minimally invasive surgery, in particular endoscopic surgery, has revolutionized the benefits for patients, but poses greater challenges for surgeons in terms of ergonomics. Integrating ergonomic assessments and interventions into the multi-stage endoscopic procedure contributes to the surgeon's musculoskeletal health and the patient's intraoperative safety and postoperative recovery. The purpose of this study was to overview the objective assessment techniques, tools and assessment settings involved in endoscopic procedures over the past decade and to identify the potential factors that induce differences in high workloads in endoscopic procedures and ultimately to design a framework for ergonomic assessment in endoscopic surgery. Literature searches were systematically conducted in the OVID, pubmed and web of science database before October 2022, and studies evaluating ergonomics during the process of endoscopic procedures or simulated procedures were both recognized. Our systematic review of 56 studies underscores ergonomic variations in endoscopic surgery. While endoscopic procedures, predominantly laparoscopy, typically incur less physical load than open surgery, extended surgical durations notably elevate ergonomic risks. Surgeon characteristics, such as experience level and gender, significantly influence these risks, with less experienced and female surgeons facing greater challenges. Key assessment tools employed include electromyography for muscle fatigue and motion analysis for postural evaluation. This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis and framework of objective ergonomic assessments in endoscopic surgery, and suggesting avenues for future research and intervention strategies. By improving the ergonomic conditions for surgeons, we can enhance their overall health, mitigate the risk of WMSDs, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Minimally invasive surgery, in particular endoscopic surgery, has revolutionized the benefits for patients, but poses greater challenges for surgeons in terms of ergonomics. Integrating ergonomic assessments and interventions into the multi-stage endoscopic procedure contributes to the surgeon's musculoskeletal health and the patient's intraoperative safety and postoperative recovery.
Objective UNASSIGNED
The purpose of this study was to overview the objective assessment techniques, tools and assessment settings involved in endoscopic procedures over the past decade and to identify the potential factors that induce differences in high workloads in endoscopic procedures and ultimately to design a framework for ergonomic assessment in endoscopic surgery.
Methods UNASSIGNED
Literature searches were systematically conducted in the OVID, pubmed and web of science database before October 2022, and studies evaluating ergonomics during the process of endoscopic procedures or simulated procedures were both recognized.
Results UNASSIGNED
Our systematic review of 56 studies underscores ergonomic variations in endoscopic surgery. While endoscopic procedures, predominantly laparoscopy, typically incur less physical load than open surgery, extended surgical durations notably elevate ergonomic risks. Surgeon characteristics, such as experience level and gender, significantly influence these risks, with less experienced and female surgeons facing greater challenges. Key assessment tools employed include electromyography for muscle fatigue and motion analysis for postural evaluation.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
This review aims to provide a comprehensive analysis and framework of objective ergonomic assessments in endoscopic surgery, and suggesting avenues for future research and intervention strategies. By improving the ergonomic conditions for surgeons, we can enhance their overall health, mitigate the risk of WMSDs, and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38249363
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1281194
pmc: PMC10796503
doi:

Types de publication

Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1281194

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Liu, Li, Li, Wang, Fan and Zhou.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Shuang Liu (S)

Mianyang Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Mianyang, China.

Yuan-You Li (YY)

Department of neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Dan Li (D)

College of Computer Science, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Feng-Yi Wang (FY)

School of Communication and Information Engineering, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing, China.

Ling-Jie Fan (LJ)

Department of rehabilitation medicine, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Liang-Xue Zhou (LX)

Department of neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Department of neurosurgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
The Fifth People's hospital of Ningxia, Ningxia, China.

Classifications MeSH