Evaluation of common clinical and hemodynamic parameters to pulmonary capillary wedge pressures in patients undergoing right heart catheterization.

Congestion PCWP heart failure right heart catheterization

Journal

Medical research archives
ISSN: 2375-1916
Titre abrégé: Med Res Arch
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101668511

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Nov 2023
Historique:
pmc-release: 01 11 2024
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

A cornerstone of heart failure assessment is the right heart catheterization and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure measurement it can provide. Clinical and hemodynamic parameters such as weight and jugular venous distention are less invasive measures often used to diagnose, manage, and treat these patients. To date, there is little data looking at the association of these key parameters to measured pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP). This is a large, retrospective, secondary analysis of a right heart catheterization database comparing clinical and hemodynamic parameters against measured PCWP in heart failure patients. A total of 538 subjects were included in this secondary analysis. Spearman's Rho analysis of each clinical and hemodynamic variable was used to compare their association to the documented PCWP. Variables analyzed included weight, body mass index (BMI), jugular venous distention (JVD), creatinine, edema grade, right atrial pressure (RAP), pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP), systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary vascular resistance, cardiac output (thermal and Fick), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate, oxygen saturation (SpO Ten out of 17 selected parameters had a statistically significant association with measured PCWP values. PADP had the strongest association (0.73, p<0.0001), followed by RAP and PASP (0.69, p<0.0001 and 0.67, p<0.0001, respectively). Other significant parameters included weight (0.2, p<0.001), BMI (0.2, p<0.001), SpO This retrospective analysis clarifies the associations of commonly used clinical and hemodynamic parameters to the clinically used gold standard for volume assessment in heart failure patients, PCWP.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38249786
doi: 10.18103/mra.v10i11.3276
pmc: PMC10795841
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

COMPETING INTERESTS STATEMENT: None

Auteurs

Kyle M Hocking (KM)

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Jessica Huston (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

Jeffery Schmeckpeper (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Monica Polcz (M)

Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.

Marisa Case (M)

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Meghan Breed (M)

Department of Emergency Medicine, TriStar Skyline Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Lexie Vaughn (L)

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Dawson Wervey (D)

Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Colleen Brophy (C)

Department of Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

JoAnn Lindenfeld (J)

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.

Bret D Alvis (BD)

Department of Surgery, Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.

Classifications MeSH