Study design approaches for future active-controlled HIV prevention trials.

HIV prevention randomized controlled trials statistical design

Journal

Statistical communications in infectious diseases
ISSN: 2194-6310
Titre abrégé: Stat Commun Infect Dis
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101529978

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 13 07 2023
accepted: 30 12 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Vigorous discussions are ongoing about future efficacy trial designs of candidate human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention interventions. The study design challenges of HIV prevention interventions are considerable given rapid evolution of the prevention landscape and evidence of multiple modalities of highly effective products; future trials will likely be 'active-controlled', i.e., not include a placebo arm. Thus, novel design approaches are needed to accurately assess new interventions against these highly effective active controls. To discuss active control design challenges and identify solutions, an initial virtual workshop series was hosted and supported by the International AIDS Enterprise (October 2020-March 2021). Subsequent symposia discussions continue to advance these efforts. As the non-inferiority design is an important conceptual reference design for guiding active control trials, we adopt several of its principles in our proposed design approaches. We discuss six potential study design approaches for formally evaluating absolute prevention efficacy given data from an active-controlled HIV prevention trial including using data from: 1) a registrational cohort, 2) recency assays, 3) an external trial placebo arm, 4) a biomarker of HIV incidence/exposure, 5) an anti-retroviral drug concentration as a mediator of prevention efficacy, and 6) immune biomarkers as a mediator of prevention efficacy. Our understanding of these proposed novel approaches to future trial designs remains incomplete and there are many future statistical research needs. Yet, each of these approaches, within the context of an active-controlled trial, have the potential to yield reliable evidence of efficacy for future biomedical interventions.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38250627
doi: 10.1515/scid-2023-0002
pii: scid-2023-0002
pmc: PMC10798828
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

20230002

Informations de copyright

© 2024 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: The authors state no conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Deborah Donnell (D)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Sheila Kansiime (S)

Medical Research Council/Uganda Virus Research Council and London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Uganda.
Medical Research Council International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.

David V Glidden (DV)

University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.

Alex Luedtke (A)

University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Peter B Gilbert (PB)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Fei Gao (F)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Holly Janes (H)

Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Classifications MeSH