Evaluating staging laparoscopy indications for pancreatic cancer based on resectability classification and treatment strategies for patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology.

pancreatic cancer peritoneal washing cytology staging laparoscopy

Journal

Annals of gastroenterological surgery
ISSN: 2475-0328
Titre abrégé: Ann Gastroenterol Surg
Pays: Japan
ID NLM: 101718062

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 30 03 2023
revised: 17 06 2023
accepted: 04 07 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

The prognosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology (CY1) is poor. We aimed to evaluate the results of staging laparoscopy (SL) and treatment efficacy in CY1 patients based on a resectability classification. We retrospectively reviewed 250 patients with PDAC who underwent SL before the initial treatment between 2017 and 2023 at the University of Toyama. The breakdown of cases by resectability classification was resectable (R):borderline resectable (BR):unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) = 131:48:71 cases. The frequency of CY1 increased in proportion to the degree of local progression (R:BR:UR-LA = 20:23:34%), but the frequencies of liver metastasis or peritoneal dissemination were comparable (R:BR:UR-LA = 6.9:6.3:8.5%). Most CY1 patients received gemcitabine along with nab-paclitaxel therapy. The CY-negative conversion rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 70:64:52%) and conversion surgery rates (R:BR:UR-LA = 40:27:9%) were inversely proportional to the degree of local progression.Comparing H0P0CY1 factors for each classification, patients with H0P0CY1 had significantly more pancreatic body or tail carcinoma and tumor size ≥32 mm in R patients, whereas in BR patients, duke pancreatic monoclonal antigen type 2 (DUPAN-2) ≥ 230 U/mL was a significant factor. In contrast, no significant factors were observed in UR-LA patients. The CY1 rates, CY-negative conversion rates, and conversion surgery rates varied according to local progression. In the case of R and BR, SL could be considered in patients with pancreatic body or tail carcinoma, large tumor size, or high DUPAN-2 level. In UR-LA, SL might be considered for all patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38250680
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12719
pii: AGS312719
pmc: PMC10797817
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

124-132

Informations de copyright

© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare for this study.

Auteurs

Takamichi Igarashi (T)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Mina Fukasawa (M)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Toru Watanabe (T)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Nana Kimura (N)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Ayaka Itoh (A)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Haruyoshi Tanaka (H)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Kazuto Shibuya (K)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Isaku Yoshioka (I)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Kenichi Hirabayashi (K)

Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Tsutomu Fujii (T)

Department of Surgery and Science, Faculty of Medicine Academic Assembly, University of Toyama Toyama Japan.

Classifications MeSH