A stepped-wedge randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy and cost-effectiveness of a care-bundle to prevent falls in older hospitalised patients.

care-bundle intervention cost-effectiveness analysis falls in hospital older people stepped-wedge design

Journal

Age and ageing
ISSN: 1468-2834
Titre abrégé: Age Ageing
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0375655

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 17 05 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Patient accidental falls in a hospital environment are a serious problem for patient safety, and for the additional costs due to associated medical interventions. The endpoints of this study were the assessment of the fall incidence in the hospital before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care-bundle, along with a cost-effectiveness evaluation. A stepped-wedge trial was conducted between April 2015 and December 2016 in Bologna University Hospital. Incidence rates (IRs) of falls in both the control and intervention periods were calculated. A multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear model with logit link function, adjusted for age, sex, cluster cross-over timing and patients' clinical severity was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) of fall risk of patients of the intervention group respect to the controls.Intervention costs associated with the introduction of the care-bundle intervention were spread between patients per cluster-period-group of exposure. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated using total costs in the intervention and control groups. IRs of falls in control and intervention periods were respectively 3.15 and 2.58 for 1,000 bed-days. After adjustment, the subjects receiving the intervention had a statistically significant reduced risk of falling with respect to those who did not (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.84). According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost per fall prevented was €873.92 considering all costs, and €1644.45 excluding costs related falls. Care-bundle had a protective effect on patients, with a statistically significant reduction of the fall risk. This type of intervention appears cost-effective compared to routine practices.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patient accidental falls in a hospital environment are a serious problem for patient safety, and for the additional costs due to associated medical interventions.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The endpoints of this study were the assessment of the fall incidence in the hospital before and after the implementation of a multidisciplinary care-bundle, along with a cost-effectiveness evaluation.
DESIGN METHODS
A stepped-wedge trial was conducted between April 2015 and December 2016 in Bologna University Hospital.
METHODS METHODS
Incidence rates (IRs) of falls in both the control and intervention periods were calculated. A multilevel mixed-effects generalised linear model with logit link function, adjusted for age, sex, cluster cross-over timing and patients' clinical severity was used to estimate odds ratios (OR) of fall risk of patients of the intervention group respect to the controls.Intervention costs associated with the introduction of the care-bundle intervention were spread between patients per cluster-period-group of exposure. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was evaluated using total costs in the intervention and control groups.
RESULTS RESULTS
IRs of falls in control and intervention periods were respectively 3.15 and 2.58 for 1,000 bed-days. After adjustment, the subjects receiving the intervention had a statistically significant reduced risk of falling with respect to those who did not (OR = 0.71, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.84). According to the cost-effectiveness analysis, the incremental cost per fall prevented was €873.92 considering all costs, and €1644.45 excluding costs related falls.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Care-bundle had a protective effect on patients, with a statistically significant reduction of the fall risk. This type of intervention appears cost-effective compared to routine practices.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38251740
pii: 7584447
doi: 10.1093/ageing/afad244
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Auteurs

Gianfranco Di Gennaro (G)

Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro "Magna Græcia", Catanzaro, Italy.

Liliya Chamitava (L)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Paolo Pertile (P)

Department of Economics, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Elisa Ambrosi (E)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Daniela Mosci (D)

Hospital Hygiene and Prevention, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Alice Fila (A)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Mulubirhan Assefa Alemayohu (MA)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Lucia Cazzoletti (L)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Stefano Tardivo (S)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Maria Elisabetta Zanolin (ME)

Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.

Classifications MeSH