Acceptability and Feasibility of a Smartphone-Based Real-Time Assessment of Suicide Among Black Men: Mixed Methods Pilot Study.

Black men acceptability behavior ecological momentary assessment feasibility implementation intervention mixed methods mobile phone real-time assessment smartphone suicide suicide prevention user experience

Journal

JMIR formative research
ISSN: 2561-326X
Titre abrégé: JMIR Form Res
Pays: Canada
ID NLM: 101726394

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 05 07 2023
accepted: 11 10 2023
revised: 29 09 2023
medline: 22 1 2024
pubmed: 22 1 2024
entrez: 22 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Suicide rates in the United States have increased recently among Black men. To address this public health crisis, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) platforms are a promising way to collect dynamic, real-time data that can help improve suicide prevention efforts. Despite the promise of this methodology, little is known about its suitability in detecting experiences related to suicidal thoughts and behavior (STB) among Black men. This study aims to clarify the acceptability and feasibility of using smartphone-based EMA through a pilot study that assesses the user experience among Black men. We recruited Black men aged 18 years and older using the MyChart patient portal messaging (the patient-facing side of the Epic electronic medical record system) or outpatient provider referrals. Eligible participants self-identified as Black men with a previous history of STB and ownership of an Android or iOS smartphone. Eligible participants completed a 7-day smartphone-based EMA study. They received a prompt 4 times per day to complete a brief survey detailing their STB, as well as proximal risk factors, such as depression, social isolation, and feeling like a burden to others. At the conclusion of each day, participants also received a daily diary survey detailing their sleep quality and their daily experiences of everyday discrimination. Participants completed a semistructured exit interview of 60-90 minutes at the study's conclusion. In total, 10 participants completed 166 EMA surveys and 39 daily diary entries. A total of 4 of the 10 participants completed 75% (21/28) or more of the EMA surveys, while 9 (90%) out of 10 completed 25% (7/28) or more. The average completion rate of all surveys was 58% (20.3/35), with a minimum of 17% (6/35) and maximum of 100% (35/35). A total of 4 (40%) out of 10 participants completed daily diary entries for the full pilot study. No safety-related incidents were reported. On average, participants took 2.08 minutes to complete EMA prompts and 2.72 minutes for daily diary surveys. Our qualitative results generally affirm the acceptability and feasibility of the study procedures, but the participants noted difficulties with the technology and the redundancy of the survey questions. Emerging themes also addressed issues such as reduced EMA survey compliance and diminished mood related to deficit-framed questions related to suicide. Findings from this study will be used to clarify the suitability of EMA for Black men. Overall, our EMA pilot study demonstrated mixed feasibility and acceptability when delivered through smartphone-based apps to Black men. Specific recommendations are provided for managing safety within these study designs and for refinements in future intervention and implementation science research. RR2-10.2196/31241.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Suicide rates in the United States have increased recently among Black men. To address this public health crisis, smartphone-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) platforms are a promising way to collect dynamic, real-time data that can help improve suicide prevention efforts. Despite the promise of this methodology, little is known about its suitability in detecting experiences related to suicidal thoughts and behavior (STB) among Black men.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
This study aims to clarify the acceptability and feasibility of using smartphone-based EMA through a pilot study that assesses the user experience among Black men.
METHODS METHODS
We recruited Black men aged 18 years and older using the MyChart patient portal messaging (the patient-facing side of the Epic electronic medical record system) or outpatient provider referrals. Eligible participants self-identified as Black men with a previous history of STB and ownership of an Android or iOS smartphone. Eligible participants completed a 7-day smartphone-based EMA study. They received a prompt 4 times per day to complete a brief survey detailing their STB, as well as proximal risk factors, such as depression, social isolation, and feeling like a burden to others. At the conclusion of each day, participants also received a daily diary survey detailing their sleep quality and their daily experiences of everyday discrimination. Participants completed a semistructured exit interview of 60-90 minutes at the study's conclusion.
RESULTS RESULTS
In total, 10 participants completed 166 EMA surveys and 39 daily diary entries. A total of 4 of the 10 participants completed 75% (21/28) or more of the EMA surveys, while 9 (90%) out of 10 completed 25% (7/28) or more. The average completion rate of all surveys was 58% (20.3/35), with a minimum of 17% (6/35) and maximum of 100% (35/35). A total of 4 (40%) out of 10 participants completed daily diary entries for the full pilot study. No safety-related incidents were reported. On average, participants took 2.08 minutes to complete EMA prompts and 2.72 minutes for daily diary surveys. Our qualitative results generally affirm the acceptability and feasibility of the study procedures, but the participants noted difficulties with the technology and the redundancy of the survey questions. Emerging themes also addressed issues such as reduced EMA survey compliance and diminished mood related to deficit-framed questions related to suicide.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Findings from this study will be used to clarify the suitability of EMA for Black men. Overall, our EMA pilot study demonstrated mixed feasibility and acceptability when delivered through smartphone-based apps to Black men. Specific recommendations are provided for managing safety within these study designs and for refinements in future intervention and implementation science research.
INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) UNASSIGNED
RR2-10.2196/31241.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38252475
pii: v8i1e48992
doi: 10.2196/48992
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

e48992

Informations de copyright

©Leslie B Adams, Thomasina Watts, Aubrey DeVinney, Emily E Haroz, Johannes Thrul, Jasmin Brooks Stephens, Mia N Campbell, Denis Antoine, Benjamin Lê Cook, Sean Joe, Roland J Thorpe Jr. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 22.01.2024.

Auteurs

Leslie B Adams (LB)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Thomasina Watts (T)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Aubrey DeVinney (A)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Emily E Haroz (EE)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Johannes Thrul (J)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.
Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.

Jasmin Brooks Stephens (JB)

Department of Psychology, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.

Mia N Campbell (MN)

Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Denis Antoine (D)

Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Benjamin Lê Cook (B)

Department of Psychiatry, Cambridge Health Alliance, Cambridge, MA, United States.

Sean Joe (S)

George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University at St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.

Roland J Thorpe (RJ)

Department of Health, Behavior, and Society, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, United States.

Classifications MeSH