Regular and Irregular Use and Reasons for Discontinuation of Solifenacin Therapy in Patients with Overactive Bladder Managed by Urologists.

everyday clinical practice overactive bladder overactive bladder pharmacotherapy real-life data solifenacin storage symptoms urinary incontinence urinary urgency

Journal

Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland)
ISSN: 1424-8247
Titre abrégé: Pharmaceuticals (Basel)
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101238453

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
16 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 02 12 2023
revised: 24 12 2023
accepted: 10 01 2024
medline: 23 1 2024
pubmed: 23 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Solifenacin, a selective muscarinic receptor antagonist, is one of the best-tolerated and most effective medicines that relieve storage symptoms in patients with an overactive bladder (OAB). However, the persistence of solifenacin in daily clinical practice remains far below that reported in clinical trials. This study aimed to analyze the adherence of patients to the therapy and the reasons for solifenacin discontinuation and non-regular use in OAB patients managed by urologists. Data concerning non-compliance and the discontinuation of solifenacin, along with the reasons, were collected during two consecutive visits for 64,049 OAB outpatients. Over the two visits, 81.6% of the patients continued therapy, and 88.6% were taking solifenacin regularly. An age ≥ 75 yrs., the male sex, a rural or small-city dwelling, and a prescription of ≥10 mg predicted therapy continuation. The female sex, a higher education, a short or long duration of an OAB, and a non-idiopathic OAB predicted regular use. The persistence of nycturia and urinary incontinence during therapy predicted both discontinuation and non-regular use. Dissatisfaction with therapy was the most frequent reason for discontinuation. In conclusion, an initial prescription of solifenacin at a low dose reduces the chance of OAB symptom improvement and results in more frequent discontinuation. A high rate of discontinuation related to dissatisfaction suggests unrealistic expectations for OAB patients and insufficient education by urologists.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38256949
pii: ph17010116
doi: 10.3390/ph17010116
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Subventions

Organisme : Adamed (Poland)
ID : AMD/OAB/2019

Auteurs

Mateusz Małkowski (M)

Adamed Pharma S.A., 05-152 Czosnow, Poland.

Agnieszka Almgren-Rachtan (A)

Department of Pharmacovigilance, Europharma Research & Science Centre Co. Ltd., 40-061 Katowice, Poland.

Magdalena Olszanecka-Glinianowicz (M)

Health Promotion and Obesity Management Unit, Department of Pathophysiology, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

Jerzy Chudek (J)

Department of Internal Medicine and Oncological Chemotherapy, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, 40-055 Katowice, Poland.

Piotr Chłosta (P)

Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-008 Krakow, Poland.

Classifications MeSH