Stool Gluten Peptide Detection Is Superior to Urinary Analysis, Coeliac Serology, Dietary Adherence Scores and Symptoms in the Detection of Intermittent Gluten Exposure in Coeliac Disease: A Randomised, Placebo-Controlled, Low-Dose Gluten Challenge Study.

coeliac disease gluten excretion stool gluten immunogenic peptides gluten-free diet monitoring

Journal

Nutrients
ISSN: 2072-6643
Titre abrégé: Nutrients
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101521595

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
17 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 14 12 2023
revised: 12 01 2024
accepted: 16 01 2024
medline: 23 1 2024
pubmed: 23 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Monitoring adherence to a gluten-free diet is an important goal of coeliac disease management. Urine and stool gluten immunogenic peptide (GIP) assays provide an objective readout of gluten ingestion, with the former favoured due to its convenience and acceptability. This study assessed stool GIP excretion after low-dose gluten challenge designed to mimic accidental gluten exposure. A total of 52 coeliac participants undertook a randomised, double-blind gluten (50-1000 mg) or placebo challenge. Stool and urinary GIP, serology, dietary adherence and symptoms were assessed. Stool GIP was 100% sensitive for gluten intake ≥250 mg and 71% for 50 mg. Peak GIP detection was 12-36 h after gluten exposure. The mean stool GIP after 1000 mg gluten ingestion remained above the limit of quantification for 5 days. Urine GIP assessment had poor sensitivity for GIP excretion compared to stool. Serology, dietary adherence score and symptoms did not correlate with gluten excretion during lead-in. We conclude that stool GIP detection is highly sensitive, with levels related to gluten dose and time from ingestion. Weekly or bi-weekly testing will detect low-level exposure more effectively than urine GIP assessments or traditional methods. In this seronegative, apparently well-treated cohort, a high frequency of baseline-positive GIP suggests ongoing gluten exposure, but the assessment of patient behaviour and assay specificity is needed.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38257173
pii: nu16020279
doi: 10.3390/nu16020279
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : APP1176553

Auteurs

Amy K Russell (AK)

Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Erin C Lucas (EC)

Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Lee M Henneken (LM)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Catherine J Pizzey (CJ)

Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Dean Clarke (D)

National Measurement Institute, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia.

Anna Myleus (A)

Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine, Umea University, 901 87 Umea, Sweden.

Jason A Tye-Din (JA)

Immunology Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Department of Gastroenterology, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Department of Medical Biology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
The Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.

Classifications MeSH