The Acti-Pair program helps men with prostate cancer increase physical activity with peer support: a mixed method pilot study.

behavior mechanisms exercise maintenance motivation prostate cancer

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 13 10 2023
accepted: 11 12 2023
medline: 23 1 2024
pubmed: 23 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although the health benefits of physical activity (PA) are recognized, prostate cancer patients do not follow PA recommendations. Barriers to PA, whether physical, environmental or organizational, are known. Furthermore, even when these barriers are overcome, this achievement is not systematically accompanied by lifestyle change. Many strategies have shown to be effective in increasing patient adherence to PA. This study aims to assess the feasibility and the viability of the Acti-Pair program which combines three strategies: peer support, a personalized and realistic PA project, and support from health and adapted physical activity professionals in a local context. We conducted a pilot study utilizing a mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology, employing feasibility and viability assessments. Quantitative assessments included recruitment, retention adherence rates, process and potential effectiveness (PA and motivation) indicators; while qualitative methods were used to evaluate the program's practicality, suitability and usefulness. Indicators of potential effectiveness were assessed before and after the intervention using a Wilcoxon test for matched data. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews conducted by two researchers with various program stakeholders. The study lasted for 3 years. Twenty-four patients were recruited over a 25-month period. Forty-two percent of patients completed the program 3 months after the beginning. We recruited 14 peers and trained nine peers over a 10-month period. The program was coordinated extensively by adapted PA professionals, while health professionals were involved in recruiting patients and peers. Self-reporting of moderate to vigorous PA was increased after the Acti-Pair program initiation [42.86 (30.76) at baseline to 53.29 (50.73)]. Intrinsic motivation significantly increased after participation in the Acti-Pair program [1.76 (1.32) before the intervention vs. 2.91 (1.13) after the intervention]. The key player to support the Acti-Pair program in the field has been the PA support system. The main challenge has been the difficulty of health professionals in promoting PA. This pilot study has shown that the Acti-Pair program is feasible and viable. It will allow us to extend the peer support intervention to other contexts and assess the effectiveness of this intervention and its generalization.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although the health benefits of physical activity (PA) are recognized, prostate cancer patients do not follow PA recommendations. Barriers to PA, whether physical, environmental or organizational, are known. Furthermore, even when these barriers are overcome, this achievement is not systematically accompanied by lifestyle change. Many strategies have shown to be effective in increasing patient adherence to PA. This study aims to assess the feasibility and the viability of the Acti-Pair program which combines three strategies: peer support, a personalized and realistic PA project, and support from health and adapted physical activity professionals in a local context.
Methods and analysis UNASSIGNED
We conducted a pilot study utilizing a mixed qualitative and quantitative methodology, employing feasibility and viability assessments. Quantitative assessments included recruitment, retention adherence rates, process and potential effectiveness (PA and motivation) indicators; while qualitative methods were used to evaluate the program's practicality, suitability and usefulness. Indicators of potential effectiveness were assessed before and after the intervention using a Wilcoxon test for matched data. Qualitative data were collected through semistructured interviews conducted by two researchers with various program stakeholders. The study lasted for 3 years.
Results UNASSIGNED
Twenty-four patients were recruited over a 25-month period. Forty-two percent of patients completed the program 3 months after the beginning. We recruited 14 peers and trained nine peers over a 10-month period. The program was coordinated extensively by adapted PA professionals, while health professionals were involved in recruiting patients and peers. Self-reporting of moderate to vigorous PA was increased after the Acti-Pair program initiation [42.86 (30.76) at baseline to 53.29 (50.73)]. Intrinsic motivation significantly increased after participation in the Acti-Pair program [1.76 (1.32) before the intervention vs. 2.91 (1.13) after the intervention]. The key player to support the Acti-Pair program in the field has been the PA support system. The main challenge has been the difficulty of health professionals in promoting PA.
Discussion UNASSIGNED
This pilot study has shown that the Acti-Pair program is feasible and viable. It will allow us to extend the peer support intervention to other contexts and assess the effectiveness of this intervention and its generalization.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38259748
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1321230
pmc: PMC10800526
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1321230

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Baudot, Barth, Colas, Garros, Garcin, Oriol, Collange, Bongue, Roche, Chauvin, Bourmaud and Hupin.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Amandine Baudot (A)

National Institute of Health and Medical (INSERM) CIC1408 Centre d'Investigation Clinique Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Unité de recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.

Nathalie Barth (N)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Chaire santé des aînés - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Gérontopôle Auvergne Rhône-alpes, Saint-Etienne, France.

Claire Colas (C)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Department of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University Hospital Center of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.

Maël Garros (M)

Sport-Health House, Departmental Olympic and Sports Committee of the Loire (42), Saint-Etienne, France.

Arnauld Garcin (A)

Unité de recherche Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.

Mathieu Oriol (M)

Centre Technique d'Appui et de Formation (CETAF), Saint-Etienne, France.

Fanny Collange (F)

National Institute of Health and Medical (INSERM) CIC1408 Centre d'Investigation Clinique Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.

Bienvenu Bongue (B)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Chaire santé des aînés - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.

Frederic Roche (F)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Chaire santé des aînés - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Department of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University Hospital Center of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.

Franck Chauvin (F)

National Institute of Health and Medical (INSERM) CIC1408 Centre d'Investigation Clinique Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.

Aurelie Bourmaud (A)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1137 Infection, Antimicrobiens, Modélisation, Evolution, Paris, France.
National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) CIC1426 Centre d'Investigation Clinique Robert Debré, Paris, France.

David Hupin (D)

National Institute of Health and Medical Research (INSERM) U1059 SAnté INgéniérie BIOlogie, Saint-Etienne, France.
Presage Institute - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Chaire santé des aînés - Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France.
Department of Clinical and Exercise Physiology, University Hospital Center of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France.

Classifications MeSH