The impact of nontransparent health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic on vaccine-hesitant people's perception of vaccines.

COVID-19 vaccine evidence-based health communication health literacy public health communication risk communication vaccine hesitancy

Journal

Frontiers in public health
ISSN: 2296-2565
Titre abrégé: Front Public Health
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101616579

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 11 07 2023
accepted: 19 12 2023
medline: 23 1 2024
pubmed: 23 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Although transparency is crucial for building public trust, public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic was often nontransparent. In a cross-sectional online study with COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant German residents ( Of the 763 participants, 90 (11.8%) said they had become more open-minded toward vaccines in general, 408 (53.5%) reported no change, and 265 (34.7%) said they had become more skeptical as a result of public health communication on COVID-19 vaccines. These subgroups differed in how incomprehensible they found public health communication and whether they thought information had been missing. Participants' ranking of trustworthy public health messaging did not provide clear-cut results: the Increased skepticism about vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic may have partly been fueled by subpar public health communication. Given the importance of public trust for coping with future health crises, public health communicators should ensure that their messaging is clear and transparent.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Although transparency is crucial for building public trust, public health communication during the COVID-19 pandemic was often nontransparent.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In a cross-sectional online study with COVID-19 vaccine-hesitant German residents (
Results UNASSIGNED
Of the 763 participants, 90 (11.8%) said they had become more open-minded toward vaccines in general, 408 (53.5%) reported no change, and 265 (34.7%) said they had become more skeptical as a result of public health communication on COVID-19 vaccines. These subgroups differed in how incomprehensible they found public health communication and whether they thought information had been missing. Participants' ranking of trustworthy public health messaging did not provide clear-cut results: the
Discussion UNASSIGNED
Increased skepticism about vaccines during the COVID-19 pandemic may have partly been fueled by subpar public health communication. Given the importance of public trust for coping with future health crises, public health communicators should ensure that their messaging is clear and transparent.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38259765
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256829
pmc: PMC10800610
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

1256829

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Wegwarth, Hertwig, Giese and Fineberg.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Odette Wegwarth (O)

Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Ralph Hertwig (R)

Center for Adaptive Rationality, Max Planck Institute for Human Development, Berlin, Germany.

Helge Giese (H)

Heisenberg Chair for Medical Risk Literacy and Evidence-Based Decisions, Clinic for Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Harvey V Fineberg (HV)

Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, Palo Alto, CA, United States.

Classifications MeSH