Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval.

QT interval alfaxalone anesthesia arrhythmias electrocardiogram propofol

Journal

Frontiers in veterinary science
ISSN: 2297-1769
Titre abrégé: Front Vet Sci
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101666658

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2023
Historique:
received: 30 10 2023
accepted: 18 12 2023
medline: 23 1 2024
pubmed: 23 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Cardiac electrical activity is often altered by administration of anesthetic drugs. While the effects of propofol in this regard have previously been described in dogs, to date, there are no reports of the effect of alfaxalone. This study investigated the impact of both propofol and alfaxalone on the ECG of 60 dogs, after premedication with acepromazine and methadone. Heart rate increased significantly in both groups. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly increased following propofol while with alfaxalone the QRS duration was significantly increased and ST segment depression was observed. The QT and JT interval were significantly shorter following induction with alfaxalone, but, when corrected (c) for heart rate, QTc and JTc in both groups were significantly greater following induction. When comparing the magnitude of change between groups, the change in RR interval was greater in the alfaxalone group. The change in both QT and JT intervals were significantly greater following alfaxalone, but when QTc and JTc intervals were compared, there were no significant differences between the two drugs. The similarly increased QTc produced by both drugs may suggest comparable proarrhythmic effects.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38260194
doi: 10.3389/fvets.2023.1330111
pmc: PMC10800659
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

1330111

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Casoria, Greet, Auckburally, Murphy and Flaherty.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Auteurs

Vincenzo Casoria (V)

Department of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, United Kingdom.

Victoria Greet (V)

Department of Cardiology, Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, United Kingdom.

Adam Auckburally (A)

Department of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, United Kingdom.

Steve Murphy (S)

Department of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, United Kingdom.

Derek Flaherty (D)

Department of Anaesthesia and Analgesia, Southern Counties Veterinary Specialists, Ringwood, United Kingdom.

Classifications MeSH