Does the choice of platinum doublet matter? A study to evaluate the impact of platinum doublet choice for treatment of platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer recurrence on the development of future PARP inhibitor and platinum resistance.

Fallopian tube cancer Ovarian cancer PARP inhibitor Platinum doublet Platinum-sensitive Primary peritoneal cancer

Journal

Gynecologic oncology
ISSN: 1095-6859
Titre abrégé: Gynecol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0365304

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 26 05 2023
revised: 04 12 2023
accepted: 10 12 2023
medline: 24 1 2024
pubmed: 24 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The use of a platinum doublet for the treatment of platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) recurrence is well established. The impact of the non‑platinum chemotherapy used as part of a platinum doublet on PARP inhibitor (PARPi) and platinum sensitivity it not known. We aimed to describe oncologic outcomes in cases of recurrent EOC receiving PARPi as maintenance therapy based on preceding platinum doublet. Retrospective study of patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer treated with platinum doublet followed by maintenance PARPi from 1/1/2015 and 1/1/2022. Comparisons were made between patients receiving carboplatin + pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (CD) versus other platinum doublets (OPDs). Descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier and univariate survival analyses were performed. 100 patients received PARPi maintenance following a platinum doublet chemotherapy regimen for platinum-sensitive recurrence. 25/100 (25%) received CD and 75/100 (75%) received OPDs. Comparing CD and OPDs, median progression-free survival was 8 versus 7 months (p = 0.26), median time to platinum resistance was 15 versus 13 months (p = 0.54), median OS was 64 versus 90 months (p = 0.28), and median OS from starting PARPi was 25 versus 26 months (p = 0.90), respectively. Using pegylated liposomal doxorubicin as part of a platinum doublet preceding maintenance PARPi for platinum-sensitive recurrence does not seem to hasten PARPi resistance or platinum resistance compared to OPDs. Although there was a non-significant trend towards increased OS among patients who received a platinum doublet other than CD prior to PARPi, the OS from PARPi start was similar between groups. Given the retrospective nature of this study and small study population, further research is needed to evaluate if the choice of platinum doublet preceding PARPi maintenance impacts PARPi resistance, platinum resistance and survival.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38262238
pii: S0090-8258(23)01605-0
doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.12.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

51-56

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of Competing Interest None.

Auteurs

Monica D Levine (MD)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America. Electronic address: monica.levine@hoag.org.

Heather Wang (H)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Bhargavi Sriram (B)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Ambar Khan (A)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Leigha Senter (L)

Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Eric M McLaughlin (EM)

Center for Biostatistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Kristin L Bixel (KL)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Laura M Chambers (LM)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

David E Cohn (DE)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Larry J Copeland (LJ)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Casey M Cosgrove (CM)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Christa I Nagel (CI)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

David M O'Malley (DM)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Floor J Backes (FJ)

Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, United States of America.

Classifications MeSH