Ceftriaxone to prevent early ventilator-associated pneumonia in patients with acute brain injury: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked superiority trial.


Journal

The Lancet. Respiratory medicine
ISSN: 2213-2619
Titre abrégé: Lancet Respir Med
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101605555

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
19 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 15 09 2023
revised: 06 12 2023
accepted: 08 12 2023
medline: 24 1 2024
pubmed: 24 1 2024
entrez: 23 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Patients with acute brain injury are at high risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The benefit of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis remains debated. We aimed to establish the effect of an early, single dose of the antibiotic ceftriaxone on the incidence of early VAP in patients with severe brain injury who required mechanical ventilation. PROPHY-VAP was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked, superiority trial conducted in nine intensive care units in eight French university hospitals. We randomly assigned comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] ≤12) adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h after acute brain injury to receive intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g or placebo once within the 12 h following tracheal intubation. Participants did not receive selective oropharyngeal and digestive tract decontamination. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients developing early VAP from the 2nd to the 7th day of mechanical ventilation, confirmed by masked assessors. The analysis was reported in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients except those who withdrew or did not give consent to continue and those who did not receive the allocated treatment because they met a criterion for non-eligibility. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02265406. From Oct 14, 2015, to May 27, 2020, 345 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ceftriaxone (n=171) or placebo (n=174); 330 received the allocated intervention and 319 were included in the analysis (162 in the ceftriaxone group and 157 in the placebo group). 166 (52%) participants in the analysis were men and 153 (48%) were women. 15 patients did not receive the allocated intervention after randomisation and 11 withdrew their consent. Adjudication confirmed 93 cases of VAP, including 74 early infections. The incidence of early VAP was lower in the ceftriaxone group than in the placebo group (23 [14%] vs 51 [32%]; hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·38-0·95], p=0·030), with no microbiological impact and no adverse effects attributable to ceftriaxone. In patients with acute brain injury, a single ceftriaxone dose decreased the risk of early VAP. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that an early, single dose of ceftriaxone be included in all bundles for the prevention of VAP in patients with brain injury who require mechanical ventilation. French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Patients with acute brain injury are at high risk of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). The benefit of short-term antibiotic prophylaxis remains debated. We aimed to establish the effect of an early, single dose of the antibiotic ceftriaxone on the incidence of early VAP in patients with severe brain injury who required mechanical ventilation.
METHODS METHODS
PROPHY-VAP was a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, assessor-masked, superiority trial conducted in nine intensive care units in eight French university hospitals. We randomly assigned comatose (Glasgow Coma Scale score [GCS] ≤12) adult patients (age ≥18 years) who required mechanical ventilation for at least 48 h after acute brain injury to receive intravenous ceftriaxone 2 g or placebo once within the 12 h following tracheal intubation. Participants did not receive selective oropharyngeal and digestive tract decontamination. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients developing early VAP from the 2nd to the 7th day of mechanical ventilation, confirmed by masked assessors. The analysis was reported in the modified intention-to-treat population, which comprised all randomly assigned patients except those who withdrew or did not give consent to continue and those who did not receive the allocated treatment because they met a criterion for non-eligibility. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02265406.
FINDINGS RESULTS
From Oct 14, 2015, to May 27, 2020, 345 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ceftriaxone (n=171) or placebo (n=174); 330 received the allocated intervention and 319 were included in the analysis (162 in the ceftriaxone group and 157 in the placebo group). 166 (52%) participants in the analysis were men and 153 (48%) were women. 15 patients did not receive the allocated intervention after randomisation and 11 withdrew their consent. Adjudication confirmed 93 cases of VAP, including 74 early infections. The incidence of early VAP was lower in the ceftriaxone group than in the placebo group (23 [14%] vs 51 [32%]; hazard ratio 0·60 [95% CI 0·38-0·95], p=0·030), with no microbiological impact and no adverse effects attributable to ceftriaxone.
INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS
In patients with acute brain injury, a single ceftriaxone dose decreased the risk of early VAP. On the basis of our findings, we recommend that an early, single dose of ceftriaxone be included in all bundles for the prevention of VAP in patients with brain injury who require mechanical ventilation.
FUNDING BACKGROUND
French Ministry of Social Affairs and Health.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38262428
pii: S2213-2600(23)00471-X
doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00471-X
pii:
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02265406']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Investigateurs

Claire Dahyot-Fizelier (C)
Sigismond Lasocki (S)
Thomas Kerforne (T)
Pierre-Francois Perrigault (PF)
Thomas Geeraerts (T)
Karim Asehnoune (K)
Raphaël Cinotti (R)
Yoann Launey (Y)
Vincent Cottenceau (V)
Marc Laffon (M)
Thomas Gaillard (T)
Matthieu Boisson (M)
Camille Aleyrat (C)
Denis Frasca (D)
Olivier Mimoz (O)
Clément Guyonnaud (C)
Rémy Bellier (R)
Thierry Benard (T)
Elsa Carise (E)
Franck Petitpas (F)
Hodanou Nanadoumgar (H)
Nadia Imzi (N)
Sabrina Seguin (S)
Karine Garnier (K)
Véronique Ferrand-Rigallaud (V)
Séverine Clerjaud (S)
Soizic Gergaud (S)
Flora Djanikian (F)
Kevin Chalard (K)
Ségolène Mrozek (S)
Sylvain Panh (S)
Antoine Roquilly (A)
Bertrand Rozec (B)
Philippe Seguin (P)
Yannick Malledant (Y)
Djilali Elaroussi (D)
Martine Ferrandiere (M)
Matthieu Biais (M)

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Claire Dahyot-Fizelier (C)

UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France. Electronic address: claire.dahyot@gmail.com.

Sigismond Lasocki (S)

Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Thomas Kerforne (T)

Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Pierre-Francois Perrigault (PF)

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Montpellier Université, Montpellier, France.

Thomas Geeraerts (T)

Anaesthesia and Critical Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, University Toulouse 3 Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France.

Karim Asehnoune (K)

Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.

Raphaël Cinotti (R)

Service d'Anesthésie Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes, Nantes Université, Nantes, France.

Yoann Launey (Y)

Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Critical Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Université de Rennes, Rennes, France.

Vincent Cottenceau (V)

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.

Marc Laffon (M)

Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Tours, Tours, France.

Thomas Gaillard (T)

Intensive Care Unit, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire d'Angers, Université d'Angers, Angers, France.

Matthieu Boisson (M)

UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Camille Aleyrat (C)

Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Denis Frasca (D)

Service d'Anesthésie-Réanimation et Médecine Péri-Opératoire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Direction de la Recherche Clinique et Innovation, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Olivier Mimoz (O)

UFR de Médicine et Pharmacie, INSERM U1070, PHAR2, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France; Service des Urgences Adultes, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.

Classifications MeSH