A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of enzalutamide and the role of liquid biopsy for evaluation of ARv7 in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases including visceral disease (Excalibur study).

ARv7 CTC androgen receptor signaling inhibitor enzalutamide liquid biopsy metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer overall survival radiographic progression-free survival visceral

Journal

Therapeutic advances in medical oncology
ISSN: 1758-8340
Titre abrégé: Ther Adv Med Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101510808

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
2024
Historique:
received: 07 06 2023
accepted: 15 11 2023
medline: 24 1 2024
pubmed: 24 1 2024
entrez: 24 1 2024
Statut: epublish

Résumé

Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis. Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes. In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7. From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively. The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.

Sections du résumé

Background UNASSIGNED
Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis.
Objectives UNASSIGNED
Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes.
Methods UNASSIGNED
In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7.
Results UNASSIGNED
From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively.
Conclusion UNASSIGNED
The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites.
Trial registration UNASSIGNED
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38264520
doi: 10.1177/17588359231217958
pii: 10.1177_17588359231217958
pmc: PMC10804904
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT03103724']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

17588359231217958

Informations de copyright

© The Author(s), 2024.

Auteurs

Pierangela Sepe (P)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.

Giuseppe Procopio (G)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Programma Prostata, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Chiara Carlotta Pircher (CC)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Umberto Basso (U)

Oncology Unit 1, Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.

Orazio Caffo (O)

Department of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.

Vera Cappelletti (V)

Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Melanie Claps (M)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Ugo De Giorgi (U)

Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.

Lucia Fratino (L)

Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.

Valentina Guadalupi (V)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Patrizia Miodini (P)

Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Cinzia De Marco (C)

Department of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Bruno Perrucci (B)

Oncology Department, ASST Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy.

Alessia Mennitto (A)

Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Medicine (DIMET), University of Eastern Piedmont (UPO), Novara, Italy.

Daniele Santini (D)

Oncologia Medica, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
University of Rome La Sapienza, Roma, Italy.

Francesco Spina (F)

Department of Hematology and Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.

Marco Stellato (M)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Filippo de Braud (F)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Elena Verzoni (E)

Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Classifications MeSH