Defining genetic diversity of rhesus macaque Fcγ receptors with long-read RNA sequencing.
Fc receptor
FcγR SNPs
FcγR structures
Long-read RNA sequencing
genetic diversity
rhesus macaques
Journal
Frontiers in immunology
ISSN: 1664-3224
Titre abrégé: Front Immunol
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101560960
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
2023
2023
Historique:
received:
03
10
2023
accepted:
20
12
2023
medline:
24
1
2024
pubmed:
24
1
2024
entrez:
24
1
2024
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Fcγ receptors (FcγRs) are membrane-bound glycoproteins that bind to the fragment crystallizable (Fc) constant regions of IgG antibodies. Interactions between IgG immune complexes and FcγRs can initiate signal transduction that mediates important components of the immune response including activation of immune cells for clearance of opsonized pathogens or infected host cells. In humans, many studies have identified associations between FcγR gene polymorphisms and risk of infection, or progression of disease, suggesting a gene-level impact on FcγR-dependent immune responses. Rhesus macaques are an important translational model for most human health interventions, yet little is known about the breadth of rhesus macaque FcγR genetic diversity. This lack of knowledge prevents evaluation of the impact of FcγR polymorphisms on outcomes of preclinical studies performed in rhesus macaques. In this study we used long-read RNA sequencing to define the genetic diversity of FcγRs in 206 Indian-origin Rhesus macaques,
Identifiants
pubmed: 38264644
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1306292
pmc: PMC10803544
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1306292Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 Conley, He, Easterhoff, Kirshner, Cocklin, Meyer, Hoxie, Berry, Bradley, Tolbert, Pazgier, Tomaras, Schmitz, Moody, Wiehe and Pollara.
Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.