Return-to-Work Coordinators' Perceptions of Their Roles Relative to Workers: A Discourse Analysis.

Disability evaluation Rehabilitation Return to work Return to work coordination Workers’ compensation

Journal

Journal of occupational rehabilitation
ISSN: 1573-3688
Titre abrégé: J Occup Rehabil
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 9202814

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 12 12 2023
medline: 24 1 2024
pubmed: 24 1 2024
entrez: 24 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

This paper describes how Canadian Return to Work coordinators (RTWC) framed their job roles relative to workers in ways that went beyond the usual professional norms of helping worker recovery. In-depth interviews were conducted with 47 RTWCs across Canada in 2018-2019. We used critical discourse analysis to analyze the way coordinators viewed workers in the complex, multi-stakeholder system of RTW. We identified four ways that RTWCs positioned themselves relative to workers: as trust builders, experts, detectives and motivators. These roles reflected RTWCs position within the system; however, their discourse also contributed to the construction of a moral hierarchy that valued worker motivation and framed some workers as attempting to exploit the RTW system. RTWCs' positions of power in the coordination process warrant further investigation of how they exercise judgement and discretion, particularly when the process depends on their ability to weigh evidence and manage cases in what might be seen as an objective and fair manner.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38265610
doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10167-7
pii: 10.1007/s10926-023-10167-7
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Subventions

Organisme : WSIB Grants Program
ID : MACE2018

Informations de copyright

© 2024. Crown.

Références

National Academy of Social Insurance: Workers’ compensation: benefits, costs, and coverage. (2020). https://www.nasi.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/2022-Workers-Compensation-Report-2020-Data.pdf. (2022). Accessed 5 May, 2023.
Association of Workers’ Compensation Boards of Canada. : Detailed key statistical measures (ksm) report-2021. https://awcbc.org/en/statistics/ksm-annual-report/ (2022). Accessed 5 May, 2023.
Shannon HS, Lowe GS. How many injured workers do not file claims for workers’ compensation benefits? Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(6):467–473. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajim.10142 .
doi: 10.1002/ajim.10142 pubmed: 12439869
Fan ZJ, Bonauto DK, Foley MP, Silverstein BA. Underreporting of work-related injury or Illness to workers’ compensation: individual and industry factors. J Occup Environ Med. 2006;48(9):914–922.
doi: 10.1097/01.jom.0000226253.54138.1e pubmed: 16966958
Corbiere M, Mazaniello-Chezol M, Bastien M-F, Wathieu E, Bouchard R, Panaccio A, et al. Stakeholders’ role and actions in the return-to-work process of workers on sick-leave due to common mental disorders: a scoping review. J Occup Rehabilitation. 2020;30(3):381–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-019-09861-2 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-019-09861-2
Liukko J, Kuuva N. Cooperation of return-to-work professionals: the challenges of multi-actor work disability management. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1466–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1198428 .
doi: 10.1080/09638288.2016.1198428 pubmed: 27373122
MacEachen E, McDonald E, Neiterman E, McKnight E, Malachowski C, Crouch M, et al. Return to work for mental ill-health: a scoping review exploring the impact and role of return-to-work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09873-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09873-3 pubmed: 32016649 pmcid: 7439237
Durand M-J, Nastasia I, Coutu M-F, Bernier M. Practices of return-to-work coordinators working in large organizations. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(1):137–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-016-9640-7 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-016-9640-7 pubmed: 27071626
Durand M-J, Coutu M-F, Tremblay D, Sylvain C, Gouin M-M, Bilodeau K, et al. Insights into the sustainable return to work of aging workers with a work disability: an interpretative description study. J Occup Rehabil. 2021;31(1):92–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-020-09894-y .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09894-y pubmed: 32347441
Bohatko-Naismith J, James C, Guest M, Rivett DA. The role of the Australian workplace return to work coordinator: essential qualities and attributes. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(1):65–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9527-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9527-4 pubmed: 24908105
Dol M, Varatharajan S, Neiterman E, McKnight E, Crouch M, McDonald E, et al. Systematic review of the impact on return to work of return-to-work coordinators. J Occup Rehabil. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-021-09975-6 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-021-09975-6 pubmed: 33881671
Hakvaag TC, Knapstad M, Bjornestad JR, Tjora T. A scooping review of scandinavian studies of sick-listed’ and social insurance officers’ experiences of their encounters. Soc Policy Adm. 2022;56(4):595–616. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12796 .
doi: 10.1111/spol.12796
James C, Southgate E, Kable A, Rivett DA, Guest M, Bohatko-Naismith J. The return-to-work coordinator role: qualitative insights for nursing. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):220–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-010-9270-4 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-010-9270-4 pubmed: 21052806
MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche R-L, Irvin E. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32(4):257–269. https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1009 .
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.1009 pubmed: 16932823
MacEachen E, Neiterman E, Malachowski C, McKnight K, Crouch C. Roadblocks and alternate routes: practical strategies for managing mental health and return to work. University of Waterloo, Ontario, 2020. https://ellenmaceachen.ca/rtw-mental-health-guide/ .
Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, inc; 1990.
Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, Munthe-Kaas H, Colvin CJ, Tunçalp Ö, et al. Applying grade-cerqual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0692-7 .
doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0692-7 pubmed: 29384082 pmcid: 5791047
Cheek J. At the margins? Discourse analysis and qualitative research. Qual Health Res. 2004;14(8):1140–1150. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732304266820 .
doi: 10.1177/1049732304266820 pubmed: 15359048
Hepburn CG, Franche RL, Francis L. Successful return to work: the role of fairness and workplace-based strategies. Int J Workplace Health Manage. 2010;3(1):7–24.
doi: 10.1108/17538351011031902
MacEachen E, Ferrier S, Kosny A, Chambers L. A deliberation on ‘hurt versus harm’ logic in early-return-to-work policy. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2007;5(2):41–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14774003.2007.11667693 .
doi: 10.1080/14774003.2007.11667693
Lax M. Not quite a win-win: the corporate agenda of the stay at work/return to work project. NEW SOLUT: J Environ Occupat Health Policy. 2015;25(1):4–24.
doi: 10.1177/1048291115569023
Gardner BT, Pransky G, Shaw WS, Nha Hong Q, Loisel P. Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72–78. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638280903195278 .
doi: 10.3109/09638280903195278 pubmed: 19925279
Kosny A, MacEachen E, Lifshen M, Smith P, Jafri GJ, Neilson C, et al. Delicate dances: immigrant workers’ experiences of injury reporting and claim filing. Ethn Health. 2012;17(3):267–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2011.614327 .
doi: 10.1080/13557858.2011.614327 pubmed: 21970445
Saunders R, Cardoso S, O’Grady J. Estimates of the nature and extent of claim suppression in British Columbia’s workers compensation system. Institute for Work and Health, Toronto, Ontario. 2020. https://www.iwh.on.ca/sites/iwh/files/iwh/reports/iwh_issue_briefing_claim_%20suppression_bc_2021.pdf .
Seing I, Ståhl C, Nordenfelt L, Bülow P, Ekberg K. Policy and practice of work ability: a negotiation of responsibility in organizing return to work. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-012-9371-3 .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9371-3 pubmed: 22653629
Ajslev JZN, Møller JL, Nimb IEE. Occupational safety and health coordinators-puzzle-piece caretakers or necessary evils. Nordic J Working Life Stud. 2022. https://doi.org/10.18291/njwls.132249 .
doi: 10.18291/njwls.132249
Kärkkäinen R, Saaranen T, Räsänen K. Return-to-work coordinators’ practices for workers with burnout. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;29(3):493–502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-018-9810-x .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-018-9810-x
Eakin JM. The discourse of abuse in return-to-work: a hidden epidemic of suffering. Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2018. p. 159–174.
Loisel P, Durand M-J, Baril R, Gervais J, Falardeau M. Interorganizational collaboration in occupational rehabilitation: perceptions of an interdisciplinary rehabilitation team. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):581–590. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-005-8036-x .
doi: 10.1007/s10926-005-8036-x pubmed: 16254757
Gard G, Larsson A. Focus on motivation in the work rehabilitation planning process: a qualitative study from the employer’s perspective. J Occup Rehabil. 2003;13(3):159–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024901201414 .
doi: 10.1023/a:1024901201414 pubmed: 12966690
Gard G. Work motivating factors in rehabilitation: a brief review. Phys Therapy Reviews. 2001;6(2):85–89. https://doi.org/10.1179/ptr.2001.6.2.85 .
doi: 10.1179/ptr.2001.6.2.85
Koch I. The guardians of the welfare state: universal credit, welfare control and the moral economy of frontline work in austerity Britain. Sociology. 2021;55(2):243–262. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038520936981 .
doi: 10.1177/0038038520936981
Eakin JM, MacEachen E, Clarke J. Playing it smart’ with return to work: small workplace experience under Ontario’s policy of self-reliance and early return. Policy Pract Health Saf. 2003;1(2):19–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/14774003.2003.11667635 .
doi: 10.1080/14774003.2003.11667635
Söderberg E, Alexanderson K. Gatekeepers in sickness insurance: a systematic review of the literature on practices of social insurance officers. Health Soc Care Commun. 2005;13(3):211–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00551.x .
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2524.2005.00551.x
Pransky GS, Shaw WS, Franche R-L, Clarke A. Disability prevention and communication among workers, physicians, employers, and insurers-current models and opportunities for improvement. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26(11):625–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280410001672517 .
doi: 10.1080/09638280410001672517 pubmed: 15204500
Pransky G, Katz JN, Benjamin K, Himmelstein J. Improving the physician role in evaluating work ability and managing disability: a survey of primary care practitioners. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(16):867–874. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638280210142176 .
doi: 10.1080/09638280210142176 pubmed: 12450463

Auteurs

P Hopwood (P)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

E MacEachen (E)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada. ellen.maceachen@uwaterloo.ca.

M Crouch (M)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

E Neiterman (E)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

E McKnight (E)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

C Malachowski (C)

School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, 200 University Ave, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Classifications MeSH