Cabozantinib and Axitinib After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study from England.


Journal

Drugs - real world outcomes
ISSN: 2199-1154
Titre abrégé: Drugs Real World Outcomes
Pays: Switzerland
ID NLM: 101658456

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jan 2024
Historique:
accepted: 21 12 2023
medline: 24 1 2024
pubmed: 24 1 2024
entrez: 24 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England. This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated. Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥  2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥  2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥  2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034). The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥  2L cabozantinib than with axitinib. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020. Cabozantinib and axitinib are anticancer drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They work by blocking the activity of proteins that cancer cells use to help them divide and grow. Cabozantinib and axitinib are treatment options for a common type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is evidence about how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in clinical trials, but it is less clear how well they work in standard practice outside of clinical trials. We investigated how cabozantinib and axitinib are used and how well they work as part of ‘real-world’ RCC care. We did this by analyzing patient data from an English cancer database. All patients in the study had advanced RCC and had been treated with at least one previous anticancer drug. This includes a type of drug that blocks new blood vessels forming, which tumors need for rapid growth. Most of the 1485 patients received cabozantinib or axitinib after receiving only one previous anticancer drug. These patients were treated for a median of 5.5 months with cabozantinib and 4.6 months with axitinib. Patients lived for a median of 11.2 months after starting cabozantinib treatment and a median of 10.4 months after starting axitinib treatment. This study provides new evidence showing how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in everyday RCC care. The results add to those from clinical trials and show the value of the English cancer registry for conducting studies of routine cancer care.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
The tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England.
METHODS METHODS
This retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
Data from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥  2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥  2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥  2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034).
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥  2L cabozantinib than with axitinib.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.
Cabozantinib and axitinib are anticancer drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They work by blocking the activity of proteins that cancer cells use to help them divide and grow. Cabozantinib and axitinib are treatment options for a common type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is evidence about how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in clinical trials, but it is less clear how well they work in standard practice outside of clinical trials. We investigated how cabozantinib and axitinib are used and how well they work as part of ‘real-world’ RCC care. We did this by analyzing patient data from an English cancer database. All patients in the study had advanced RCC and had been treated with at least one previous anticancer drug. This includes a type of drug that blocks new blood vessels forming, which tumors need for rapid growth. Most of the 1485 patients received cabozantinib or axitinib after receiving only one previous anticancer drug. These patients were treated for a median of 5.5 months with cabozantinib and 4.6 months with axitinib. Patients lived for a median of 11.2 months after starting cabozantinib treatment and a median of 10.4 months after starting axitinib treatment. This study provides new evidence showing how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in everyday RCC care. The results add to those from clinical trials and show the value of the English cancer registry for conducting studies of routine cancer care.

Autres résumés

Type: plain-language-summary (eng)
Cabozantinib and axitinib are anticancer drugs called tyrosine kinase inhibitors. They work by blocking the activity of proteins that cancer cells use to help them divide and grow. Cabozantinib and axitinib are treatment options for a common type of kidney cancer called renal cell carcinoma (RCC). There is evidence about how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in clinical trials, but it is less clear how well they work in standard practice outside of clinical trials. We investigated how cabozantinib and axitinib are used and how well they work as part of ‘real-world’ RCC care. We did this by analyzing patient data from an English cancer database. All patients in the study had advanced RCC and had been treated with at least one previous anticancer drug. This includes a type of drug that blocks new blood vessels forming, which tumors need for rapid growth. Most of the 1485 patients received cabozantinib or axitinib after receiving only one previous anticancer drug. These patients were treated for a median of 5.5 months with cabozantinib and 4.6 months with axitinib. Patients lived for a median of 11.2 months after starting cabozantinib treatment and a median of 10.4 months after starting axitinib treatment. This study provides new evidence showing how well cabozantinib and axitinib work in everyday RCC care. The results add to those from clinical trials and show the value of the English cancer registry for conducting studies of routine cancer care.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38265633
doi: 10.1007/s40801-023-00415-w
pii: 10.1007/s40801-023-00415-w
doi:

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT04637204']

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

© 2024. The Author(s).

Références

International Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization. Globocan 2020 Kidney fact sheet. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/cancers/29-Kidney-fact-sheet.pdf . [Accessed 20 Jul 2023].
International Agency for Research on Cancer World Health Organization. Globocan 2020 United Kingdom fact sheet. Available from: https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/826-united-kingdom-fact-sheets.pdf . Accessed 20 Jul 2023.
Cancer Research UK. Kidney cancer statistics. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/health-professional/cancer-statistics/statistics-by-cancer-type/kidney-cancer . Accessed 21 Nov 2021.
Graves A, Hessamodini H, Wong G, Lim WH. Metastatic renal cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, genetics, and therapeutic modalities. Immunotargets Ther. 2013;2:73–90. https://doi.org/10.2147/ITT.S31426 .
doi: 10.2147/ITT.S31426 pubmed: 27471690 pmcid: 4928369
Pandey J, Syed W. Renal cancer. StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK558975/ . Accessed 2 Feb 2022.
Pal SK, Ghate SR, Li N, Swallow E, Peeples M, Zichlin ML, et al. Real-world survival outcomes and prognostic factors among patients receiving first targeted therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma: a SEER-medicare database analysis. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15:e573–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2016.12.005 pubmed: 28139444
Weiss RH, Lin PY. Kidney cancer: identification of novel targets for therapy. Kidney Int. 2006;69:224–32. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.ki.5000065 .
doi: 10.1038/sj.ki.5000065 pubmed: 16408110
Gul A, Rini BI. Adjuvant therapy in renal cell carcinoma. Cancer. 2019;125:2935–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.32144 .
doi: 10.1002/cncr.32144 pubmed: 31225907
Cindolo L, Patard JJ, Chiodini P, Schips L, Ficarra V, Tostain J, et al. Comparison of predictive accuracy of four prognostic models for nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy: a multicenter European study. Cancer. 2005;104:1362–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.21331 .
doi: 10.1002/cncr.21331 pubmed: 16116599
Hirsch BR, Burke JM, Agrawal M, Hauke RJ, Hutson TE, Doshi G, et al. Sequential therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Kidney Cancer VHL. 2016;3:23–35. https://doi.org/10.15586/jkcvhl.2016.46 .
doi: 10.15586/jkcvhl.2016.46 pubmed: 28326277 pmcid: 5345527
Quhal F, Mori K, Bruchbacher A, Resch I, Mostafaei H, Pradere B, et al. First-line immunotherapy-based combinations for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2021;4:755–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.001 .
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2021.03.001 pubmed: 33757737
Voog E, Campillo-Gimenez B, Elkouri C, Priou F, Rolland F, Laguerre B, et al. Long survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma: results of real life study of 344 patients. Int J Cancer. 2020;146:1643–51. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32578 .
doi: 10.1002/ijc.32578 pubmed: 31318983
Karner C, Kew K, Wakefield V, Masento N, Edwards SJ. Targeted therapies for previously treated advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2019;9: e024691. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691 .
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024691 pubmed: 30826762 pmcid: 6429896
Powles T, ESMO Guidelines Committee. Recent eUpdate to the ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines on renal cell carcinoma on cabozantinib and nivolumab for first-line clear cell renal cancer: renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2021;32:422–3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.016 .
doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.11.016 pubmed: 33271289
Kerbel RS. Tumor angiogenesis. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2039–49. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra0706596 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706596 pubmed: 18463380 pmcid: 4542009
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M, Rioux-Leclercq N, Bex A, Khoo V, et al. Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:706–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz056 .
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz056 pubmed: 30788497
Ipsen Pharma. Cabometyx
Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, Mainwaring PN, Rini BI, Donskov F, et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373:1814–23. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1510016 .
doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510016 pubmed: 26406150 pmcid: 5024539
Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, Tannir NM, Mainwaring PN, Rini BI, et al. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:917–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30107-3 .
doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(16)30107-3 pubmed: 27279544
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance [TA463]: cabozantinib for previously treated advanced renal cell carcinoma. 2019. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta463 . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
Choueiri TK, Halabi S, Sanford BL, Hahn O, Michaelson MD, Walsh MK, et al. Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial targeted therapy for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma of poor or intermediate risk: the Alliance A031203 CABOSUN trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:591–7. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2016.70.7398 .
doi: 10.1200/jco.2016.70.7398 pubmed: 28199818
Choueiri TK, Hessel C, Halabi S, Sanford B, Michaelson MD, Hahn O, et al. Cabozantinib versus sunitinib as initial therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma of intermediate or poor risk (Alliance A031203 CABOSUN randomised trial): progression-free survival by independent review and overall survival update. Eur J Cancer. 2018;94:115–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.012 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.02.012 pubmed: 29550566 pmcid: 6057479
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance [TA542]: cabozantinib for untreated advanced renal cell carcinoma. 2018. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta542 . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
Pfizer Europe MA EEIG. Inlyta 1 mg film-coated tablets (axitinib) EU summary of product characteristics. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/product-information/inlyta-epar-product-information_en.pdf . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Kaprin A, Szczylik C, Hutson TE, et al. Comparative effectiveness of axitinib versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell carcinoma (AXIS): a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2011;378:1931–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9 .
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61613-9 pubmed: 22056247
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Technology appraisal guidance [TA333]: axitinib for treating advanced renal cell carcinoma after failure of prior systemic treatment. 2015. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ta333 . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
Albiges L, Flechon A, Chevreau C, Topart D, Gravis G, Oudard S, et al. Real-world evidence of cabozantinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the CABOREAL early access program. Eur J Cancer. 2021;142:102–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.030 .
doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.09.030 pubmed: 33253997
Gan CL, Dudani S, Wells JC, Donskov F, Pal SK, Dizman N, et al. Cabozantinib real-world effectiveness in the first-through fourth-line settings for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Cancer Med. 2021;10:1212–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3717 .
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3717 pubmed: 33463028 pmcid: 7926018
Maruzzo M, Pierantoni F, Bortolami A, Palleschi D, Zivi A, Nicodemo M, et al. Real-world treatment with nivolumab or cabozantinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the Veneto region of Italy: results of AMOUR study. Target Oncol. 2022;17:467–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-022-00892-z .
doi: 10.1007/s11523-022-00892-z pubmed: 35751733 pmcid: 9345814
McGrane J, Frazer R, Challapalli A, Ratnayake G, Lydon A, Parslow DS, et al. A multicenter real-world study reviewing systemic anticancer treatment choices and drop off rates between treatment lines for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the United Kingdom: in the immunotherapy era [abstract]. Presented at 2022 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:358. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.358 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.6_suppl.358
Lee S, Kim SG, Park S, Lee J, Beom SH, Shin SJ, et al. Value of cabozantinib in the treatment of advanced metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC): real-world data from a single Korean institution [abstract]. Presented at 2021 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2021;2021(39): e16578. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16578 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2021.39.15_suppl.e16578
Bamias A, Zakopoulou R, Tzannis K, Sakellakis M, Koutsoukos K, Kyriazoglou A, et al. Outcomes from treatment of metastatic renal-cell carcinoma following failure of first-line anti-VEGF/VEGFR therapy: real-life evidence on the change of the treatment paradigm. Anticancer Drugs. 2023;34:413–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/CAD.0000000000001420 .
doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000001420 pubmed: 36730619
Cesas A, Urbonas V, Tulyte S, Janciauskiene R, Liutkauskiene S, Grabauskyte I, et al. Sequential treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients after first-line vascular endothelial growth factor targeted therapy in a real-world setting: epidemiologic, noninterventional, retrospective-prospective cohort multicentre study. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023;149:6979–88. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-04645-x .
doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-04645-x pubmed: 36847839 pmcid: 10374746
Navani V, Wells JC, Boyne DJ, Cheung WY, Brenner DM, McGregor BA, et al. CABOSEQ: the effectiveness of cabozantinib in patients with treatment refractory advanced renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC). Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2023;21(106):e1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2022.07.008 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.07.008
Poon DM, Chan K, Leung AK, Ng B, Cheung FY, Siu SW, et al. Real-world experience of cabozantinib in Asian patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma following treatment with VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors and/or immune-checkpoint inhibitors. Drugs Context. 2023;12:2023-4–1. https://doi.org/10.7573/dic.2023-4-1 .
doi: 10.7573/dic.2023-4-1 pubmed: 37378080 pmcid: 10291967
Loo Gan C, Huang J, Pan E, Xie W, Schmidt AL, Labaki C, et al. Real-world practice patterns and safety of concurrent radiotherapy and cabozantinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: results from the International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium. Eur Urol Oncol. 2023;6:204–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.004 .
doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2022.10.004 pubmed: 36328934
Shah NJ, Sura SD, Shinde R, Shi J, Singhal PK, Robert NJ, et al. Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in the current treatment era. Eur Urol Open Sci. 2023;49:110–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.015 .
doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.12.015 pubmed: 36874600 pmcid: 9974999
Nathan PD, Allison J, Charnley N, Griffiths R, Michael A, Moore K, et al. Real-world treatment sequencing and outcomes for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma treated with cabozantinib after first-line checkpoint inhibitor-based combination therapy: results from the CARINA study [abstract]. Presented at 2023 ASCO Annual Meeting. J Clin Oncol. 2023;2023(41): e16512. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16512 .
doi: 10.1200/JCO.2023.41.16_suppl.e16512
Venugopal B, Pillai M, Powles T, Savage P, Michael A, Fife K, et al. Early clinical experience with cabozantinib for advanced renal cell carcinoma in the UK: real-world treatment pathways and clinical outcomes. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022;20:94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.005 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.09.005 pubmed: 34802966
National Disease Registration Service. Systemic anti-cancer therapy chemotherapy dataset. 2021. Available from: http://www.chemThaodataset.nhs.uk/home . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service. Cancer outcomes and services dataset. Available from: http://www.ncin.org.uk/collecting_and_using_data/data_collection/cosd#about . Accessed 6 Jan 2022.
Noronha V, Abraham G, Patil V, Joshi A, Menon N, Mahajan A, et al. A real-world data of immune checkpoint inhibitors in solid tumors from India. Cancer Med. 2021;10:1525–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3617 .
doi: 10.1002/cam4.3617 pubmed: 33591635 pmcid: 7940210
Patil V, Abraham G, Ravikrishna M, Bhattacharjee A, Noronha V, Parekh D, et al. Retrospective analysis: checkpoint inhibitor accessibility for thoracic and head and neck cancers and factors influencing it in a tertiary centre in India. Ecancermedicalscience. 2022;16:1464. https://doi.org/10.3332/ecancer.2022.1464 .
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2022.1464 pubmed: 36819818 pmcid: 9934881
Santoni M, Heng DY, Bracarda S, Procopio G, Milella M, Porta C, et al. Real-world data on cabozantinib in previously treated patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: focus on sequences and prognostic factors. Cancers (Basel). 2019;12:84. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers12010084 .
doi: 10.3390/cancers12010084 pubmed: 31905816 pmcid: 7016527
Procopio G, Prisciandaro M, Iacovelli R, Cortesi E, Fornarini G, Facchini G, et al. Safety and efficacy of cabozantinib in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma: real-world data from an Italian managed access program. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16:e945–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clgc.2018.03.014 .
doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.03.014 pubmed: 29753637
Motzer RJ, Escudier B, Tomczak P, Hutson TE, Michaelson MD, Negrier S, et al. Axitinib versus sorafenib as second-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: overall survival analysis and updated results from a randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2013;14:552–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70093-7 .
doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(13)70093-7 pubmed: 23598172
Scottish Medicines Consortium. Cabozantinib (Cabometyx) advice, SMC No 1234/17. 2017. Available from: https://www.scottishmedicines.org.uk/medicines-advice/cabozantinib-cabometyx-fullsubmission-123417/ . Accessed 25 Jul 2023.

Auteurs

Janet Brown (J)

Division of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. j.e.brown@sheffield.ac.uk.

Brooke Harrow (B)

Formerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Anne Marciniak (A)

Formerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Christine McCarthy (C)

Formerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Aude Houchard (A)

Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.

Lori Cirneanu (L)

IQVIA, London, UK.

Andrew Protheroe (A)

Department of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Classifications MeSH