Efficacy of the TuttleNumbNow Intraosseous Method for Pulpal Anesthesia in the Mandibular First Molar - A Prospective, Randomized, Crossover Study.

Anesthesia Articaine Infiltration Intraosseous TNN

Journal

Journal of endodontics
ISSN: 1878-3554
Titre abrégé: J Endod
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7511484

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
22 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 18 11 2023
revised: 09 01 2024
accepted: 09 01 2024
medline: 25 1 2024
pubmed: 25 1 2024
entrez: 24 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Previous studies on intraosseous (IO) anesthesia as a primary injection have shown high success rates. The TuttleNumbNow (TNN) is a new primary IO injection technique that has not been scientifically evaluated. Therefore, the purpose of this prospective randomized, crossover, study was to evaluate the anesthetic efficacy of the TNN IO technique using the Septoject Evolution needle when compared to a buccal infiltration for pulpal anesthesia in the mandibular first molar. One-hundred and four healthy subjects were randomly assigned to two treatment groups, separated by at least two weeks. One set of injections consisted of a buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar using 1.8 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine, followed by a mock TNN injection distal to the mandibular first molar. The other set of injections was a mock buccal infiltration of the mandibular first molar, followed by a TNN injection of 1.8 mL of 4% articaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine distal to the mandibular first molar. Statistical analyses were performed. For the mandibular first molar, which had a 42% anesthetic success (highest 80 reading) with the buccal infiltration compared to 49% with the TNN, no statistically significant difference in success was observed (p=0.2115). The TNN technique has been advocated as an intraosseous injection. However, the inability to deliver anesthetic solution to the cancellous bone resulted in an anesthetic success rate of 49%. The success was statistically similar to a buccal infiltration (42%) and would not provide adequate pulpal anesthesia as a primary injection.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38266911
pii: S0099-2399(24)00034-7
doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2024.01.003
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2024 American Association of Endodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Tyler Dolphin (T)

Former Graduate Student in Endodontics, The Ohio State University.

Sara Fowler (S)

Associate Professor and Predoctoral Director, Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University.

Melissa Drum (M)

Professor and Graduate Program Director, Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University.

John Nusstein (J)

Professor and Chair, Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University.

Al Reader (A)

Emeritus Professor, Division of Endodontics, The Ohio State University. Electronic address: reader.2@osu.edu.

John Draper (J)

Assistant Professor, Assistant Professor, Fisher College of Business, The Ohio State University.

Classifications MeSH