Sex Disparities in Academic Productivity and Rank Among Abdominal Transplant Faculty in the United States.


Journal

Transplantation proceedings
ISSN: 1873-2623
Titre abrégé: Transplant Proc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0243532

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
23 Jan 2024
Historique:
received: 09 09 2023
accepted: 30 11 2023
medline: 25 1 2024
pubmed: 25 1 2024
entrez: 24 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in academic rank and productivity among members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons in the United States. Cross-sectional, focusing on current board-certified abdominal transplant surgeons in the United States. Demographic factors such as sex, region, and faculty rank were collected from institutional websites. Academic metrics, including H-index, total publications, and relative citation ratio, were collected from Scopus and iCite. We identified 536 surgeon members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons with an academic institution. The majority were men (83%). Men were in practice longer than women (17.9 ± 11 vs 11.7 ± 9 years, P < .0001) and had higher academic metrics, including H-index (25.6 ± 20 vs16.4 ± 14, P < .0001) and total publications (110 ± 145 vs 58.8 ± 69, P < .0001). There was a significant difference in faculty appointments by sex (P < .05), with men showing evidence of increased academic advancement. After adjusting for academic rank, PhD status, and location of medical school and residency, women remained associated with a lower H-index on multivariate analysis (P < .01). Sex disparities in academic rank and achievement are present among transplant surgical faculty in the United States, and future efforts are needed to promote sex equity in transplant surgery academia.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The aim of this study was to examine sex differences in academic rank and productivity among members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons in the United States.
METHODS METHODS
Cross-sectional, focusing on current board-certified abdominal transplant surgeons in the United States. Demographic factors such as sex, region, and faculty rank were collected from institutional websites. Academic metrics, including H-index, total publications, and relative citation ratio, were collected from Scopus and iCite.
RESULTS RESULTS
We identified 536 surgeon members of the American Society of Transplant Surgeons with an academic institution. The majority were men (83%). Men were in practice longer than women (17.9 ± 11 vs 11.7 ± 9 years, P < .0001) and had higher academic metrics, including H-index (25.6 ± 20 vs16.4 ± 14, P < .0001) and total publications (110 ± 145 vs 58.8 ± 69, P < .0001). There was a significant difference in faculty appointments by sex (P < .05), with men showing evidence of increased academic advancement. After adjusting for academic rank, PhD status, and location of medical school and residency, women remained associated with a lower H-index on multivariate analysis (P < .01).
CONCLUSION CONCLUSIONS
Sex disparities in academic rank and achievement are present among transplant surgical faculty in the United States, and future efforts are needed to promote sex equity in transplant surgery academia.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38267336
pii: S0041-1345(23)00763-7
doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2023.11.008
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Auteurs

Damilola R Fakunle (DR)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Allison M Ammann (AM)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Stephanie Sisak (S)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Aaron M Delman (AM)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Dennis M Vaysburg (DM)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Kristina Lemon (K)

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Latifa Silski (L)

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Tammy Holm (T)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Shimul A Shah (SA)

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Ralph C Quillin (RC)

Cincinnati Research and Education in Surgical Training, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio; Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio. Electronic address: ralph.quillin@uc.edu.

Classifications MeSH