Verification of surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) alignment for proton breast and chest wall patients by comparison to CT-on-rails and kV-2D alignment.

CTOR SGRT kV-2D proton

Journal

Journal of applied clinical medical physics
ISSN: 1526-9914
Titre abrégé: J Appl Clin Med Phys
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101089176

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
24 Jan 2024
Historique:
revised: 10 12 2023
received: 27 03 2023
accepted: 20 12 2023
medline: 25 1 2024
pubmed: 25 1 2024
entrez: 25 1 2024
Statut: aheadofprint

Résumé

Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) systems have been widely installed and utilized on linear accelerators. However, the use of SGRT with proton therapy is still a newly developing field, and published reports are currently very limited. To assess the clinical application and alignment agreement of SGRT with CT-on-rails (CTOR) and kV-2D image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for breast treatment using proton therapy. Four patients receiving breast or chest wall treatment with proton therapy were the subjects of this study. Patient #1's IGRT modalities were a combination of kV-2D and CTOR. CTOR was the only imaging modality for patients #2 and #3, and kV-2D was the only imaging modality for patient #4. The patients' respiratory motions were assessed using a 2-min surface position recorded by the SGRT system during treatment. SGRT offsets reported after IGRT shifts were recorded for each fraction of treatment. The agreement between SGRT and either kV-2D or CTOR was evaluated. The respiratory motion amplitude was <4 mm in translation and <2.0 Due to the overall agreement between SGRT and IGRT within reasonable tolerance, SGRT has the potential to serve as a valuable auxiliary IGRT tool for proton breast treatment and may improve the efficiency of proton breast treatment.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Surface-guided radiation therapy (SGRT) systems have been widely installed and utilized on linear accelerators. However, the use of SGRT with proton therapy is still a newly developing field, and published reports are currently very limited.
PURPOSE OBJECTIVE
To assess the clinical application and alignment agreement of SGRT with CT-on-rails (CTOR) and kV-2D image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) for breast treatment using proton therapy.
METHODS METHODS
Four patients receiving breast or chest wall treatment with proton therapy were the subjects of this study. Patient #1's IGRT modalities were a combination of kV-2D and CTOR. CTOR was the only imaging modality for patients #2 and #3, and kV-2D was the only imaging modality for patient #4. The patients' respiratory motions were assessed using a 2-min surface position recorded by the SGRT system during treatment. SGRT offsets reported after IGRT shifts were recorded for each fraction of treatment. The agreement between SGRT and either kV-2D or CTOR was evaluated.
RESULTS RESULTS
The respiratory motion amplitude was <4 mm in translation and <2.0
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Due to the overall agreement between SGRT and IGRT within reasonable tolerance, SGRT has the potential to serve as a valuable auxiliary IGRT tool for proton breast treatment and may improve the efficiency of proton breast treatment.

Identifiants

pubmed: 38268200
doi: 10.1002/acm2.14263
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

e14263

Informations de copyright

© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Références

Al-Hallaq HA, Cerviño L, Gutierrez AN, et al. AAPM task group report 302: surface-guided radiotherapy. Med Phys. 2022;49(4):e82-e112. doi:10.1002/mp.15532. Epub ahead of print.
Kügele M, Mannerberg A, Nørring Bekke S, et al. Surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves breast cancer patient setup accuracy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(9):61-68. doi:10.1002/acm2.12700. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
Kost S, Guo B, Xia P, Shah C. Assessment of setup accuracy using anatomical landmarks for breast and chest wall irradiation with surface guided radiation therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2019;9(4):239-247. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2019.03.002. Epub 2019 Mar 23.
Hattel SH, Andersen PA, Wahlstedt IH, Damkjaer S, Saini A, Thomsen JB. Evaluation of setup and intrafraction motion for surface guided whole-breast cancer radiotherapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(6):39-44. doi:10.1002/acm2.12599
Ates O, Zhao L, Sobczak D, et al. Design of a novel 5-camera surface guidance system with multiple imaging isocenters. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2022;23(10):e13750. doi:10.1002/acm2.13750. Epub ahead of print.
MacFarlane MJ, Jiang K, Mundis M, et al. Comparison of the dosimetric accuracy of proton breast treatment plans delivered with SGRT and CBCT setups. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2021;22(9):153-158. doi:10.1002/acm2.13357. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
Batin E, Depauw N, MacDonald S, Lu HM. Can surface imaging improve the patient setup for proton postmastectomy chest wall irradiation? Pract Radiat Oncol. 2016;6(6):e235-e241. doi:10.1016/j.prro.2016.02.001. Epub 2016 Feb 11.
Zhao H, Williams N, Poppe M, et al. Comparison of surface guidance and target matching for image-guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Med Phys. 2019;46(11):4717-4724. doi:10.1002/mp.13816. Epub 2019 Oct 4.
Paxton AB. SGRT for proton therapy. Surface Guided Radiation Therapy. CRC Press; 2020:421-436.

Auteurs

Hui Zhao (H)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Vikren Sarkar (V)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Sara St James (S)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Adam Paxton (A)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Fan-Chi Frances Su (FF)

University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA.

Ryan G Price (RG)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Christian Dial (C)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Matthew Poppe (M)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

David Gaffney (D)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Bill Salter (B)

Radiation Oncology Department, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Classifications MeSH