Twelve-month efficacy of CGRP monoclonal antibodies and predictive value of short-term response: results of an Australian multicentre study.

Clinical trials show that calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) are effective preventative treatments for chronic migraine. Their efficacy over longer time periods and in cohorts originally excluded from trials remains uncertain. This study aims to explore the impact of CGRP mAbs in an Australian real-life setting. A multicentre cohort study was performed in the tertiary headache clinics of the Alfred and Austin Hospitals, Melbourne, Australia. Patients were commenced on a CGRP mAb for chronic migraine and asked to keep a headache diary, recorded at 3 monthly appointments for 12 months. Primary outcome was a ≥50% reduction in monthly headache days (MHD). From a population of 105 patients, 90 patients commenced galcanezumab and 15 commenced fremanezumab. The ≥50% responder rate of the cohort was 52.4% after 3 months. Over 12 months follow-up, 25.7% of the cohort ceased due to a lack of efficacy and 16.2% ceased due to an adverse event. There was no difference in response or cessation between medications. There was poor agreement in 3-month and 12-month response rates (Cohen's κ=0.130; p=0.171). On subgroup analysis, continuous headache at baseline and number of trialled preventative treatments were the only factors associated with efficacy. CGRP mAbs were associated with sustained reductions in MHD over 12-month follow-up in patients with resistant migraine in Australia. Further studies are required to determine treatment options for patients with continuous headache. Poor agreement between outcomes at 3 and 12 months highlights the need to assess some patients at later timepoints.

Informations de copyright

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Competing interests: JCR has received funding for educational presentations from Allergan, Novartis and has served on medical advisory boards for Pfizer, Viatris and Lilly. SC and LD report no potential conflict of interest. MM serves on the advisory board for Allergan, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Autonomic Technologies and Teva and has received payment for the development of educational presentations from Allergan, electroCore, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Teva. EJH has served on advisory boards for Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis, Teva, Eli Lilly, Allergan, Lundbeck, been involved in clinical trials sponsored by Novartis, Teva, Xalud, Cerecin and has received payment for educational presentations from Allergan, Teva, Eli Lilly and Novartis.