Histopathological vertical margin positivity in cold snare polypectomy and mucosal resection for sessile serrated lesions.
Cold snare polypectomy
Colorectal polyp
Endoscopic mucosal resection
Sessile serrated lesion
Journal
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
ISSN: 1097-6779
Titre abrégé: Gastrointest Endosc
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0010505
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
23 Jan 2024
23 Jan 2024
Historique:
received:
18
07
2023
revised:
28
12
2023
accepted:
16
01
2024
medline:
26
1
2024
pubmed:
26
1
2024
entrez:
25
1
2024
Statut:
aheadofprint
Résumé
Evidence regarding the status of the vertical margin of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) resected using cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is lacking, and whether a histopathologically positive vertical margin is related to recurrence remains unclear. Therefore, this preliminary study aimed to clarify the rates of positive or unevaluable vertical and horizontal margins and the rate of muscularis mucosae resection in SSLs treated using CSP compared with those treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). Histological outcomes of patients treated with CSP or EMR for SSL were evaluated in this single-center observational study. The primary outcome was the incidence of histopathologically positive vertical margins in CSP and EMR. Furthermore, the comparisons were adjusted for confounding factors using propensity score matching. Overall, 82 patients with SSLs were included in the CSP and EMR groups after matching. The incidence of positive histological vertical margins in the CSP and EMR groups were 67.1% and 2.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Regarding the evaluation of the presence of muscularis mucosae, 29.3% and 98.8% of the patients in the CSP and EMR groups, respectively, had a complete muscularis mucosae resection (p<0.001). A rigorous histopathologic evaluation revealed that for SSLs, CSP more frequently leads to positive vertical margins than EMR.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND AND AIMS
OBJECTIVE
Evidence regarding the status of the vertical margin of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) resected using cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is lacking, and whether a histopathologically positive vertical margin is related to recurrence remains unclear. Therefore, this preliminary study aimed to clarify the rates of positive or unevaluable vertical and horizontal margins and the rate of muscularis mucosae resection in SSLs treated using CSP compared with those treated with endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR).
METHODS
METHODS
Histological outcomes of patients treated with CSP or EMR for SSL were evaluated in this single-center observational study. The primary outcome was the incidence of histopathologically positive vertical margins in CSP and EMR. Furthermore, the comparisons were adjusted for confounding factors using propensity score matching.
RESULTS
RESULTS
Overall, 82 patients with SSLs were included in the CSP and EMR groups after matching. The incidence of positive histological vertical margins in the CSP and EMR groups were 67.1% and 2.4%, respectively (p<0.001). Regarding the evaluation of the presence of muscularis mucosae, 29.3% and 98.8% of the patients in the CSP and EMR groups, respectively, had a complete muscularis mucosae resection (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
CONCLUSIONS
A rigorous histopathologic evaluation revealed that for SSLs, CSP more frequently leads to positive vertical margins than EMR.
Identifiants
pubmed: 38272275
pii: S0016-5107(24)00044-0
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2024.01.029
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2024 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.